Get Vedic Sanskrit essential facts below. View Videos or join the Vedic Sanskrit discussion. Add Vedic Sanskrit to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Archaic language in the Vedas (2nd millennium BCE)
Extensive ancient literature in the Vedic Sanskrit language has survived into the modern era, and this has been a major source of information for reconstructing Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Indo-Iranian history.
The separation of Proto-Indo-Iranian language into Proto-Iranian and Proto-Indo-Aryan is estimated, on linguistic grounds, to have occurred around or before 1800 BCE.
The date of composition of the oldest hymns of the Rigveda is vague at best, generally estimated to roughly 1500 BCE. Both Asko Parpola (1988) and J. P. Mallory (1998) place the locus of the division of Indo-Aryan from Iranian in the Bronze Age culture of the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC). Parpola (1999) elaborates the model and has "Proto-Rigvedic" Indo-Aryans intrude the BMAC around 1700 BCE. He assumes early Indo-Aryan presence in the Late Harappan horizon from about 1900 BCE, and "Proto-Rigvedic" (Proto-Dardic) intrusion to the Punjab as corresponding to the Gandhara grave culture from about 1700 BCE. According to this model, Rigvedic within the larger Indo-Aryan group is the direct ancestor of the Dardic languages.
The early Vedic Sanskrit language was far less homogeneous compared to the language defined by Pini, i.e., Classic Sanskrit. The language in the early Upanishads of Hinduism and the late Vedic literature approaches Classical Sanskrit. The formalization of the late form of Vedic Sanskrit language into the Classical Sanskrit form is credited to Pini's Adhy?y?, along with Patanjali's Mahabhasya and Katyayana's commentary that preceded Patanjali's work.
Five chronologically distinct strata can be identified within the Vedic language:
The first three are commonly grouped together, as the Sa?hit?s[A] comprising the four Vedas:[B] ?k, atharvan, yajus, s?man, which together constitute the oldest texts in Sanskrit and the canonical foundation both of the Vedic religion, and the later religion known as Hinduism.
Many words in the Vedic Sanskrit of the ?g·veda have cognates or direct correspondences with the ancient Avestan language, but these do not appear in post-Rigvedic Indian texts. The text of the ?g·veda must have been essentially complete by around the 12th century BCE. The pre-1200 BCE layers mark a gradual change in Vedic Sanskrit, but there is disappearance of these archaic correspondences and linguistics in the post-Rigvedic period.
This period includes both the mantra and prose language of the Atharvaveda (Paippalada and Shaunakiya), the ?g·vedaKhilani, the Samaveda Sa?hit?, and the mantras of the Yajurveda. These texts are largely derived from the ?g·veda, but have undergone certain changes, both by linguistic change and by reinterpretation. For example, the more ancient injunctive verb system is no longer in use.
An important linguistic change is the disappearance of the injunctive, subjunctive, optative, imperative (the aorist). New innovations in Vedic Sanskrit appear such as the development of periphrastic aorist forms. This must have occurred before the time of Pini because Panini makes a list of those from northwestern region of India who knew these older rules of Vedic Sanskrit.
In this layer of Vedic literature, the archaic Vedic Sanskrit verb system has been abandoned, and a prototype of pre-Panini Vedic Sanskrit structure emerges. The Yajñag?th?s texts provide a probable link between Vedic Sanskrit, Classical Sanskrit and languages of the Epics. Complex meters such as Anuubh and rules of Sanskrit prosody had been or were being innovated by this time, but parts of the Br?hma?a layers show the language is still close to Vedic Sanskrit.
Vedic had a retroflex lateral approximant ([?])[iii] as well as its breathy-voiced counterpart () [iv], which are not found in classical Sanskrit, with the corresponding plosives instead ? and ?h, it was also metrically a cluster, suggesting Proto-Indo-Aryan pronunciations of * and * (see Mitanni-Aryan) before the loss of voiced sibilants, which occurred after the split of Proto-Indo-Iranian.
The vowels e and o were actually realized in Vedic as diphthongsai and au, but they became pure monophthongs in later Sanskrit, such as daivá- > devá-. However, the dipthongal behaviour still resurfaces in sandhi.
The vowels ai and au were correspondingly realized in Vedic as long diphthongs?i and ?u, but they became correspondingly short in Classical Sanskrit: dyus > dyáus.
The Pr?tikhyas claim that the "dental" consonants were articulated from the root of the teeth (dantam?l?ya, alveolar), but they became pure dentals later, whereas most other systems including Pini designate them as dentals.
The Pr?tikhyas are inconsistent about but generally claim that it was also a dantam?l?ya. According to Pini it is a retroflex consonant.
The pluti (trimoraic) vowels were on the verge of becoming phonemicized during middle Vedic, but disappeared again.
Vedic often allowed two like vowels in certain cases to come together in hiatus without merger during sandhi, which has been reconstructed as the influence of an old laryngeal still present in the Proto-Indo-Iranian stage of the language: PIE*h?weh?·nt- -> va·ata-.[C]
Vedic had a pitch accent which could even change the meaning of the words, and was still in use in Pini's time, as we can infer by his use of devices to indicate its position. At some latter time, this was replaced by a stress accent limited to the second to fourth syllables from the end.[a]
Since a small number of words in the late pronunciation of Vedic carry the so-called "independent svarita" on a short vowel, one can argue that late Vedic was marginally a tonal language. Note however that in the metrically-restored versions of the Rig Vedaalmost all of the syllables carrying an independent svarita must revert to a sequence of two syllables, the first of which carries an ud?tta and the second a so-called dependent svarita. Early Vedic was thus definitely not a tone language like Chinese but a pitch accent language like Japanese, which was inherited from the Proto-Indo-European accent.
Pitch accent was not restricted to Vedic: early Sanskrit grammarian Pini gives both accent rules for the spoken language of his (post-Vedic) time as well as the differences of Vedic accent. We have, however, no extant post-Vedic text with accents.
Pluti is the term for the phenomenon of overlong vowels in Sanskrit; the overlong vowels are themselves called pluta. Pluta vowels are usually noted with a numeral "3" (indicating a length of three morae), ?3, ?3, ?3, ?̄3, ?̄3, also e3 (?3i), o3 (?3u).
Pluta vowels are recorded a total of 3 times in the Rigveda and 15 times in the Atharvaveda, typically in cases of questioning and particularly where two options are being compared. For example:
RV 10.129.5d adhá? svid ?sî3d upári svid ?s?3t "Was it above? Was it below?"
AV 9.6.18 idá? bhûy?3 idâ3miti "Is this larger? Or this?"
The pluti attained the peak of their popularity in the Brahmana period of late Vedic Sanskrit (roughly 8th century BC), with some 40 instances in the Shatapatha Brahmana alone.
^Parpola, Asko (1999), "The formation of the Aryan branch of Indo-European", in Blench, Roger & Spriggs, Matthew, Archaeology and Language, vol. III: Artefacts, languages and texts, London and New York: Routledge.