R-labialization
Get R-labialization essential facts below. View Videos or join the R-labialization discussion. Add R-labialization to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
R-labialization

Pronunciation of the phoneme /r/ in the English language has many variations in different dialects.

Variations

Depending on dialect, /r/ has at least the following allophones in varieties of English around the world:[1]

In most dialects /r/ is labialized [] in many positions, as in reed [i:d] and tree [ti:]; in the latter case, the /t/ may be slightly labialized as well.[5] In General American, it is labialized at the beginning of a word but not at the end.[]

In many dialects, /r/ in the cluster /dr/, as in dream, is realized as a postalveolar fricative [] or less commonly alveolar []. In /tr/, as in tree, it is a voiceless postalveolar fricative [?] or less commonly alveolar [].[6] In England, while the approximant has become the most common realization, /r/ may still be pronounced as a voiceless tap [] after /?/ (as in thread).[7] Tap realization of /r/ after /?/ is also reported in some parts of the United States, particularly Utah.[8]

There are two primary articulations of the approximant /r/: apical (with the tip of the tongue approaching the alveolar ridge or even curled back slightly) and domal (with a centralized bunching of the tongue known as molar r or sometimes bunched r or braced r ). Peter Ladefoged wrote: "Many BBC English speakers have the tip of the tongue raised towards the roof of the mouth in the general location of the alveolar ridge, but many American English speakers simply bunch the body of the tongue up so that it is hard to say where the articulation is".[9] The extension to the IPA recommends the use of the IPA diacritics for "apical" and "centralized", as in ⟨, ⟩, to distinguish apical and domal articulations in transcription. However, this distinction has little or no perceptual consequence, and may vary idiosyncratically between individuals.[10]

Rhoticity and non-rhoticity

English accents around the world are frequently characterized as either rhotic or non-rhotic. Most accents in England, Wales, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa speak non-rhotic accents, and in those English dialects, the historical English phoneme /r/ is not pronounced except before a vowel.

On the other hand, the historical /r/ is pronounced in all contexts in rhotic accents, which are spoken in most of Scotland, Ireland, the United States, Canada, and in some English accents (like in the West Country and some parts of Lancashire and the far north). Thus, a rhotic accent pronounces marker as ['m?rk?r], and a non-rhotic accent pronounces the same word as ['m?:k?]. In rhotic accents, when /r/ is not followed by a vowel phoneme, it generally surfaces as r-coloring of the preceding vowel or its coda: nurse [n?s], butter ['b?t?].

R-labialization

R-labialization, which should not be confused with the rounding of initial /r/ described above, is a process occurring in certain dialects of English, particularly some varieties of Cockney, in which the /r/ phoneme is realized as a labiodental approximant [?], in contrast to an alveolar approximant [?].

The use of labiodental /r/ is commonly stigmatized by prescriptivists. However, it is used in many other languages, and its use is growing in many accents of British English.[11] Most speakers who do so are from the South-East of England, particularly London.

That has also been reported to be an extremely-rare realization of /r/ in New Zealand English.[12]

The /r/ realization may not always be labiodental since bilabial and velarized labiodental realizations have been reported.

R-labialization leads to pronunciations such as these:

  • red - [d]
  • ring - []
  • rabbit - ['?æb?t]
  • Merry Christmas - [mi 'ksm?s]

However, the replacement of /r/ by some kind of labial approximant may also occur caused by a type of speech impediment called rhotacism or derhotacization.

See also

References

  1. ^ Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English. Volume 1: An Introduction, Volume 2: The British Isles, Volume 3: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.
  2. ^ Hickey, Raymond (2007). Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14-15, 320.
  3. ^ a b Spitzbardt, Harry (1976). English in India. p. 31. Retrieved 2020.
  4. ^ Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Peter Garrett, Nikolas Coupland, Angie Williams. 15 July 2003. p. 73. ISBN 9781783162086.
  5. ^ Ladefoged, Peter (2001). Vowels and Consonants (4th ed.). Blackwell. p. 103.
  6. ^ Gimson, Alfred Charles (2014). Cruttenden, Alan (ed.). Gimson's Pronunciation of English (8th ed.). Routledge. pp. 177, 186-8. ISBN 9781444183092.
  7. ^ Ogden, Richard (2009). An Introduction to English Phonetics. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 90-2. ISBN 9780748625413.
  8. ^ Stanley, Joseph A. (2019). "(thr)-Flapping in American English: Social factors and articulatory motivations" (PDF). Proceedings of the 5th Annual Linguistics Conference at UGA. Athens, Georgia: The Linguistics Society at the University of Georgia. pp. 49-63. hdl:10724/38831.
  9. ^ Ladefoged, Peter (2001). A Course in Phonetics. Harcourt College Publishers. p. 55.
  10. ^ Laver, John (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge. p. 300.
  11. ^ Foulkes, Paul, and Gerard J. Docherty. (eds.) (1999). Urban Voices. Arnold
  12. ^ Bauer, Laurie; Warren, Paul; Bardsley, Dianne; Kennedy, Marianna; Major, George (2007), "New Zealand English", Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37 (1): 100, doi:10.1017/S0025100306002830

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

R-labialization
 



 



 
Music Scenes