Get Pre-Greek essential facts below. View Videos or join the Pre-Greek discussion. Add Pre-Greek to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Extinct language of prehistoric Greece
The Pre-Greek substrate (or Pre-Greek substratum) consists of the unknown language(s) spoken in prehistoric Greece before the coming of the Proto-Greek language in the area during the Bronze Age. It is possible that Greek acquired some thousand words and proper names from such a language(s), because some of its vocabulary cannot be satisfactorily explained as deriving from Proto-Greek and a Proto-Indo-European reconstruction is almost impossible for such terms.
According to Beekes, the material "shows that we are largely dealing with one language, or a group of closely related dialects or languages".
However, Biliana Mihaylova finds no contradiction between "the idea of [an] Indo-European Pre-Greek substratum" and "the possibility of the existence of an earlier non-Indo-European layer in Greece" given certain pre-Greek words possessing Indo-European "pattern[s] of word formation".
Coming of Proto-Greek
Estimates for the introduction of the Proto-Greek language into prehistoric Greece have changed over the course of the 20th century. Since the decipherment of Linear B, searches were made "for earlier breaks in the continuity of the material record that might represent the 'coming of the Greeks'".
The majority of scholars date the coming of Proto-Greek to the transition from Early Helladic II to Early Helladic III (c. 2400-2200/2100 BC). This has been criticized by John E. Coleman, who argues that this estimate is based on stratigraphic discontinuities at Lerna that other archaeological excavations in Greece suggested were the product of chronological gaps or separate deposit-sequencing instead of cultural changes. Coleman estimates that the entry of Proto-Greek speakers into the Greek peninsula occurred during the late 4th millennium BC (c. 3200 BC) with pre-Greek spoken by the inhabitants of the Late Neolithic II period.
Although no written texts exist or have been identified as pre-Greek, the lexicon has been partially reconstructed via the considerable number of words that have been borrowed into Greek; such words often show a type of variation not found in inherited Indo-European Greek terms, and certain recurrent patterns that can be used to identify pre-Greek elements.
The phonology of pre-Greek likely featured a series of both labialized and palatalized consonants, as indicated by Mycenaean inscriptions in Linear B. These features were found not only in stops, but in resonants as well (presumably including even the rare modified approximants /j?/ and /w?/), which was different from Indo-European languages at the time and is generally considered a rare feature characteristic of pre-Greek.
It is, however, unlikely that voicing or consonantal aspiration were distinctive features, as pre-Greek loanwords in Greek vary freely between plain, voiced and aspirated stops (e.g. /, aspháragos/aspáragos, 'asparagus'). The observation of such variants for a particular word is often a strong indication of substrate-derived etymology.
Furthermore, while the existence of word-initial approximants /w/ and /j/ can be safely inferred from common motifs in inherited words (e.g. the - from *ja- in , ) or even retained in early and dialectal forms (e.g. *wa- in the cases of ?-, -, -), word-initial aspiration probably did not exist, with /h/ considered by Beekes a non-native phoneme in pre-Greek.
Consonant phonemes of Pre-Greek as posited by Beekes (2014)
The pre-Greek language had a simple vowel system, with either three or five monophthongs. This system consisted of either /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/, or most likely just /a/, /i/, /u/, in which /a/ varied between /a/~/e/~/o/ as a result of palatalization for /e/ and labialization for /o/.
Additionally, it had at least one diphthong (/au/), and it may also have had /ou/, although this is also often explained as the sequence -ar?- adapted in Greek as --, since /ou/ is often seen with an /r/.
Characteristic sound groups
Certain characteristic sound groups associated with pre-Greek phonology as reflected in words inherited into Greek, as listed by Beekes, include:
-- /au/, also common in PIE-derived words
-?- /b/, rather rare in PIE but very common in pre-Greek loans
-- /bd/, rare in PIE, not as much in pre-Greek
-- /gd/, rare in PIE, not in pre-Greek
-- /gn/, not as rare in both PIE and pre-Greek
-- /dn/, rare in PIE, not in pre-Greek
-- /kt/, common in PIE but in pre-Greek also with variants --, -- etc.
-- /kk?/, not possible in PIE, only in pre-Greek (but rare)
-- /mn/, common in PIE and also in many pre-Greek words
-- /ou/, integral IE diphthong, yet also very frequent in pre-Greek especially as -- from *-ar?-
-- /pp?/, not possible in PIE, though still very rare in pre-Greek
-- /rd/, possible in PIE, also found in some pre-Greek words
-- /rkn/, very rare overall and found only in pre-Greek loans
-- /rn/, when pre-Greek usually also with variants -- and --
-?- /s/ and initial ?- /s/ or /z/, very common in pre-Greek and characteristic when it shows up as an s-mobile
-- /sb/, very rare and problematic identification in PIE, common in pre-Greek probably from *-sg?-
-- /sg/, rare in PIE, common in pre-Greek perhaps from *-t?g-
non word-initial -- /sk/ and -- /st/, rare in PIE, somehow common in pre-Greek derivative words
-- /tt?/, impossible in PIE, common in pre-Greek
-- /stl/, possible in PIE but more common in substrare words
-- /p?t?/, possible in PIE but also common in pre-Greek loans
-- /k?m/ and -- /k?n/, rare in PIE, sometimes in substrate words
word-initial ?- /ps/, extremely common in pre-Greek loans (most words beginning with ?- being such)
There are different categories of words that have been suggested to be pre-Greek, or "Aegean", loanwords such as:
, stémphylon, 'mass of olives from which the oil has been pressed, mass of pressed grapes'.
, th?rax, 'corselet';
, mást?x, 'whip';
, hyssós, 'javelin'.
, arýballos, 'purse';
, brókhos, 'slip knot, mesh';
?, ?lakát?, 'spindle';
, mýrinthos, 'cord'.
Various explanations have been made for these substrate features. Among these are:
Anatolian Indo-European contact
Based upon toponymic evidence, it is generally assumed that a language was once spoken in both the Greek peninsula and western Anatolia before both Mycenaean Greek and the attested Anatolian languages became predominant. Various explanations for this phenomenon have been given by scholars. From the distribution of the names, it appears that this language was spoken during the Early Helladic II period, which began around 2800 BC.
This substrate language, whose influence is observable on Ancient Greek and Anatolian languages, is taken by a number of scholars to be related to the Indo-European Luwian language, and to be responsible for the widespread place-names ending in -ssa and -nda in Western Anatolia, and -ssos and -nthos in mainland Greece, respectively. For instance, the name of the mount Parnassos in Greece has been interpreted as the Luwianparna- ('house') attached to the possessive suffix -ssa-. Both Hittite and Luwian texts also attest a place-name Parnassa, which could be related. Philologist Martin L. West has proposed to name the language "Parnassian", and has argued for "a parallel movement down from Thrace by a branch of the same people as entered Anatolia, the people who were to appear 1,500 years later as the Luwians".
Other scholars have proposed that this substrate was brought to Greece by pre-Indo-European Anatolian settlers. In most cases, it is impossible to distinguish between substrate words and loans from Asia Minor, and terms like (tolúp?; 'clew, ball of wool ready for spinning') show typical pre-Greek features while being related to Anatolian words (in this case Luwian and Hittitetaluppa/i- 'lump, clod') with no common Indo-European etymology, suggesting that they were borrowed into both Ancient Greek and Anatolian languages from the same substrate.
However, of the few words of secure Anatolian origin, most are cultural items or commodities which are likely the result of commercial exchange, not of a substratum. Furthermore, the correlations between Anatolian and Greek placenames may in fact represent a common early phase of Indo-European spoken before the Anatolian languages developed in Asia Minor and Greek in mainland Greece. Some of the relevant vocabulary can be explained alternatively as linguistic exchange between Greek and Anatolic languages across the Aegean Sea without necessarily originating from a change of language.
However, many Minoan loanwords found in Mycenaean Greek (e.g., words for architecture, metals and metallurgy, music, use of domestic species, social institutions, weapons, weaving) have been asserted to be the result of socio-cultural and economic interactions between the Minoans and Mycenaeans during the Bronze Age, and may therefore be part of a linguistic adstrate in Greek rather than a substrate.
However, the Lemnos funerary stele was written in a form of ancient Etruscan, which suggested that the author had emigrated from Etruria in Italy, rather than the Greek sphere, and the Homeric tradition makes no mention of a Tyrrhenian presence on Lemnos.
If Etruscan was spoken in Greece, it must have been effectively a language isolate, with no significant relationship to or interaction with speakers of pre-Greek or ancient Greek, since, in the words of C. De Simone, there are no Etruscan words that can be "etymologically traced back to a single, common ancestral form with a Greek equivalent".
In 1979, Edzard J. Furnée proposed a theory by which a pre-Greek substrate is associated with the Kartvelian languages.
^Beekes 2014, pp. 47-48: "Our knowledge of Indo-European has expanded so much, especially in the last thirty years (notably because of the laryngeal theory) that in some cases we can say almost with certainty that an Indo-European reconstruction is impossible. [...] In my EDG, I marked with >PG< all words which, in my view, were of Pre-Greek origin. I found 1106 words.".
^Other theories ranging from the mild (e.g., Egyptian) to the extreme (e.g., Proto-Turkic) have been proposed but have been given little to no consideration from the broader academic community and as such are not mentioned in the main body of this article.
^Finkelberg 2006, p. 52: "As we have seen, the suffixes -nth- and -ss-, which a hundred years ago gave rise to the hypothesis of the non-Indo-European pre-Hellenic substratum, can now be accounted for as typically Anatolian or, to be more precise, Luwian."
^Gere 2006, p. 112: "Arthur Evans would live to repent of his suggestion to the British School that they reopen the excavations at Mycenae. He had expected that his theory of Minoan dominance over the mainland would be borne out, but instead he encountered stout resistance... Evans could never bring himself to believe any story except that of Minoan colonisation of the mainland from the beginning to the end of Mycenaean history."
De Simone, C. (2007). "9 Greek and Etruscan". In Christidis, A.-F.; Arapopoulou, Maria; Chrit?, Maria (eds.). A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 786-791. ISBN978-0-521-83307-3.
Mihaylova, Biliana (2012). "The Pre-Greek Substratum Revisited". In Hejl, Christina Løye; Jacquet, Janus Bahs; Heide, Marie; Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen; Olsen, Birgit Anette (eds.). Etymology and the European Lexicon(PDF). Copenhagen: Roots of Europe (University of Copenhagen). pp. 80-81.
Renfrew, Colin (1998). "Word of Minos: The Minoan Contribution to Mycenaean Greek and the Linguistic Geography of the Bronze Age Aegean". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 8 (2): 239-264. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001852.
Beattie, A.J. (1963). "Before Greek Alfred Heubeck: Praegraeca: sprachliche Untersuchungen zum vorgriechischindogermanischen Substrat. (Erlanger Forschungen, Reihe A, Band 12.) Pp. 90. Erlangen: Universitätsbibliothek, 1961. Paper". The Classical Review. 13 (2): 177-178. doi:10.1017/s0009840x00215370.