Get Phonological History of the English Language essential facts below. View Videos or join the Phonological History of the English Language discussion. Add Phonological History of the English Language to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Word-final /n/ was then lost after unstressed syllables with nasalization of the preceding vowel. Hence Pre-PGmc *d?og?om > early PGmc *dagam > late PGmc *dag? > Old Englishdæ? "day (acc. sg.)". The nasalisation was retained at least into the earliest history of Old English.
Word-final /t/ was lost after an unstressed syllable. This followed the loss of word-final /n/, because it remained before /t/: PrePGmc *b?r?n?t > early PGmc *burunt > late PGmc *burun "they carried".
The original vowel remained when followed by /r/, and was later lowered to /?/.
Early i-mutation: /e/ was raised to /i/ when an /i/ or /j/ followed in the next syllable.
This occurred before deletion of word-final /i/; hence PIE *upéri > early PGmc *uberi > late PGmc *ubiri > German über "over". Compare PIE *upér > early PGmc *uber > late PGmc *ubar > German ober "over".
But it occurred after the raising of unstressed /e/ to /i/: PIE *b?érete > PGmc *berid > *birid "you carry (pl)".
This also affected the diphthong /eu/, which became /iu/.
This change was only sporadic at best because there were barely any words in which it could have occurred at all, since /e/ remained only in stressed syllables. The umlauting effect of /z/ remained, however, and in Old West Norse it was extended to other vowels as well. Hence OEN gla?, hrau?, OWN gler, hreyrr.
This change followed the raising of /e/ before a nasal: PGmc *þenhan? > *þinhan? > *þhan? > Gothic þeihan.
Final-syllable short vowels were generally deleted in words of three syllables or more. PGmc *biridi > Goth baíriþ/beri?/ "(he) carries" (see above), and also PGmc *-maz, *-miz > *-mz (dative and instrumental plural ending of nouns, 1st person plural ending of verbs, as on the Stentoften Runestone).
Northwest Germanic period
This was the period that existed after the East Germanic languages had split off. Changes during this time were shared with the North Germanic dialects, i.e. Proto-Norse. Many of the changes that occurred were areal, and took time to propagate throughout a dialect continuum that was already diversifying. Thus, the ordering of the changes is sometimes ambiguous, and can differ between dialects.
In this initial stage, the mutated vowels were still allophonically conditioned, and were not yet distinct as phonemes. Only later, when the /i/ and /j/ were modified or lost, were the new sounds phonemicized.
i-mutation affected all the Germanic languages except for Gothic, although with a great deal of variation. It appears to have occurred earliest, and to be most pronounced, in the Schleswig-Holstein area (the home of the Anglo-Saxons), and from there to have spread north and south. However, it is possible that this change already occurred in Proto-Germanic proper, in which case the phenomenon would have remained merely allophonic for quite some time. If that is the case, that would be the stage reflected in Gothic, where there is no orthographic evidence of i-mutation at all.
Long vowels and diphthongs were affected only later, probably analogically, and not in all areas. Notably, they were not mutated in most (western) Dutch dialects, whereas short vowels were.
a-mutation: /u/ is lowered to /o/ when a non-high vowel follows in the next syllable.
This is blocked when followed by a nasal followed by a consonant, or by a cluster with /j/ in it. Hence PG *gulþ? > OE/ModE gold, but PG *guldijan? > OE gyldan > ModE gild.
This produces a new phoneme /o/, due to inconsistent application and later loss of word-final vowels.
Final-syllable long vowels were shortened.
Final /?:/ becomes /o/, later raised to /u/. PG *sag? ("saw (tool)") > OE sagu, ON s?g.
Final /?:/ becomes /e/ in ON (later raised to /i/), /?/ in West Germanic. PG *hailid? ("he/she/it healed") > ON heilði, but OE h?lde, OHG heilta.
The final long diphthong /?:i/ loses its final element and usually develops the same as /?:/ from that point on. PG *geb?i ("gift", dative singular) > NWG *geb? > ON gj?f, OHG gebu, OE giefe (an apparent irregular development).
"Overlong" vowels were shortened to regular long vowels.
PG /?:/ (maybe already /æ:/ by late PG) becomes /?:/. This preceded final shortening in West Germanic, but postdated it in North Germanic.
Unstressed diphthongs were monophthongized. /?i/ > /e:/, /?u/ > /o:/. The latter merged with ? from shortened overlong ô. PG *sunauz ("son", genitive singular) > NWG *sun?z > ON sonar, OE suna, OHG suno; PG *nemai ("he/she/it take", subjunctive) > NWG *nem? > ON nemi, OE nime, OHG neme; PG *stainai ("stone", dative singular) > NWG *stain? > ON steini, OE st?ne, OHG steine.
West Germanic period
This period occurred around the 2nd to 4th centuries. It is unclear if there was ever a distinct "Proto-West Germanic", as most changes in this period were areal, and likely spread throughout a dialect continuum that was already diversifying further. Thus, this "period" may not have been a real timespan, but may simply cover certain areal changes that did not reach into North Germanic. This period ends with the further diversification of West Germanic into several groups before and during the Migration Period: Ingvaeonic, Istvaeonic (Old Frankish) and Irminonic (Upper German).
Loss of word-final /z/.
This change occurred before rhotacization, as original word-final /r/ was not lost.
/z/ was not lost in single-syllable words in southern and central German. Compare PG *miz > OS mi, OE me vs. OHG mir.
The OE nominative plural -as (ME -s), OS nominative plural -?s may be from original accusative plural *-ans, due to the Ingvaeonic Nasal-Spirant law, rather than original nominative plural *-?z, which would be expected to become *-a (OHG -a, compare ON -ar).
This change also affected Proto-Norse, but only much later. /z/ and /r/ were still distinct in the Danish and Swedish dialect of Old Norse, as is testified by distinct runes. (/z/ is normally assumed to be a rhotic fricative in this language, but there is no actual evidence of this.)
PG *deuz? > Goth dius; OE d?or > ModE deer
West Germanic gemination: single consonants followed by /j/ except /r/ became double (geminate). This only affected consonants preceded by a short vowel, because those preceded by a long vowel or by another consonant were never followed by /j/ due to Sievers' law.
This period is estimated to have lasted only a century or so, the 4th to 5th; the time during which the Franks started to spread south into Gaul (France) and the various coastal people began colonising Britain. Changes in this period affected the Ingvaeonic languages, but not the more southerly Central and Upper German languages. The Ingvaeonic group was probably never homogeneous, but was divided further into Old Saxon and Anglo-Frisian. Old Frankish (and later Old Dutch) was not in the core group, but was affected by the spread of several areal changes from the Ingvaeonic area.
The Anglo-Frisian languages shared several unique changes that were not found in the other West Germanic languages. The migration to Britain caused a further split into early Old English and early Old Frisian.
Fronting of /?/ to /æ/ (unless followed by a geminate, by a back vowel in the next syllable, or in certain other cases). Hence OE dæ?/dæj/ "day", plural dagas/ds/ "days" (dialectal ModE "dawes"; compare ModE "dawn" < OE dagung/du/).
This does not affect nasal //. And since this is a back vowel, /?/ in a preceding syllable was prevented from being fronted as well. This created an alternation between the infinitive in *-an? and strong past participle in *-ana (< PG *anaz), where the former became -an in OE but the latter became *-ænæ > -en.
Fronting of /?:/ to /æ:/ (generally, unless /w/ followed).
Final-syllable /æ/, /?/ and // are lost.
No attested West Germanic languages show any reflexes of these vowels. However, the way it affected the fronting of /?/ as described above shows that at least // was retained into the separate history of Anglo-Frisian.
Old English period
This period is estimated to be c. AD 475-900. This includes changes from the split between Old English and Old Frisian (c. AD 475) up through historic early West Saxon of AD 900:
Most generally, before /x, w/, and /r, l/ + consonant (assumed to be velarized[r?, ?] in these circumstances), but exact conditioning factors vary from vowel to vowel.
Initial result was a falling diphthong ending in /u/, but this was followed by diphthong height harmonization, producing short /æ/, //, // from short /æ/, /e/, /i/, long /æ?/, /eo/, /iu/ from long /æ:/, /e:/, /i:/.
Written ea, eo, io, where length is not distinguished graphically.
Result in some dialects, for example Anglian, was back vowels rather than diphthongs. West Saxonceald; but Anglian cald > ModE cold.
This produces alternations such as OE dæ? "day", pl. dagas (cf. dialectal dawes "days").
Palatalization of velar consonants: /k, ?, ?, sk/ were palatalized to /t?, d?, ?, ?/ in certain complex circumstances. A similar palatalization happened in Frisian, but by this point the languages had split up; the Old English palatalization must be ordered after Old-English-specific changes such as a-restoration.
Generally, the velar stops /k, ?/ were palatalized before /i(:)/ or /j/; after /i(:)/ when not before a vowel; and /k/ was palatalized at the beginning of a word before front vowels. (At this point, there was no word-initial /?/.)
/?/ was palatalized in somewhat broader circumstances: By any following front vowel, as well as by a preceding front vowel when a vowel did not immediately follow the /?/.
/?/ later becomes /j/, but not before the loss of older /j/ below.
/sk/ is palatalized in almost all circumstances. PG *skipaz > ModE ship (cf. skipper < Dutch schipper, where no such change happened), but West Frisian skip. PG *skurtijaz > OE scyrte > ModE shirt, but > ON skyrt > ModE skirt. An example of retained /sk/ is PG *aisk?n? > OE ascian > ModE ask; there is evidence that OE ascian was sometimes rendered metathetized to acsian, which is the presumed origin of ModE ask.
Palatal diphthongization: Initial palatal /j/, /t?/, /?/ trigger spelling changes of a > ea, e > ie. It is disputed whether this represents an actual sound change or merely a spelling convention indicating the palatal nature of the preceding consonant (written g, c, sc were ambiguous in OE as to palatal /j/, /t?/, /?/ and velar /?/ or /?/, /k/, /sk/, respectively).
Similar changes of o > eo, u > eo are generally recognized to be merely a spelling convention. Hence WG /ju/ > OE geong/ju/ > ModE "young"; if geong literally indicated an /?/ diphthong, the modern result would be *yeng.
It is disputed whether there is Middle English evidence of the reality of this change in Old English.
i-mutation: The most important change in the Old English period. All back vowels were fronted before a /i, j/ in the next syllable, and front vowels were raised.
/?(:)/ > /æ(:)/ (but /?/ > /e/ before /m/ or /n/);
/o(:)/ > /ø(:)/ > /e(:)/;
/u(:)/ > /y(:)/;
/æa/, /eo/ > /iy/ > /y:/; this also applied to the equivalent short diphthongs.
Short /e/ > /i/ by an earlier pan-Germanic change under the same circumstances; often conflated with this change.
This had dramatic effects in inflectional and derivational morphology, e.g. in noun paradigms (f?t "foot", pl. f?t "feet"); verb paradigms (bacan "to bake", bæcþ "he bakes"); nominal derivatives from adjectives (strang "strong", strengþ(u) "strength"), from verbs (cuman "to come", cyme "coming"), and from other nouns (fox "fox", fyxenn "vixen"); verbal derivatives (f?da "food", f?dan "to feed"); comparative adjectives (eald "old", ieldra "older, elder"). Many echoes of i-mutation are still present in the modern language.
Close-vowel loss: Loss of word-final /i/ and /u/ (also from earlier /o:/) except when following a short syllable (i.e. one with a short vowel followed by a single consonant.) For example, PIE *sunus > PG *sunuz > OE sunu "son (nom. sing.)", PIE *pe?u > PG *fehu > OE feohu "cattle (nom. sing.)", PIE *wenis > PG *winiz > OE ?ine "friend (nom. sing.)", but PrePG *p?des > PG *f?tiz > WG *fø?ti > OE f?t "foot (nom. pl.)".
A similar change happened in the other West Germanic languages, although after the earliest records of those languages.
This did not affect the new /j/ (< /?/) formed from palatalisation of PG */?/, suggesting that it was still a palatal fricative at the time of the change. For example, PG *wr?gijanan > early OE *wrø:?ijan > OE ?ran (/wre:jan/).
Following this, PG */j/ occurred only word-initially and after /r/ (which was the only consonant that was not geminated by /j/ and hence retained a short syllable).
H-loss: Proto-Germanic /x/ is lost between vowels, and between /l, r/ and a vowel. The preceding vowel is lengthened.
This leads to alternations such as eoh "horse", pl. ?os, and ?ealh "foreigner", pl. alas.
Palatal umlaut: Short e, eo, io become i (occasionally ie) before hs, ht.
Hence riht "right" (cf. Germanrecht), siex "six" (cf. German sechs).
Vowel reductions in unstressed syllables:
/o:/ became /?/ in final syllables, but usually appears as o in medial syllables (although a and u both appear).
/æ/ and /i/ (if not deleted by high-vowel loss) became /e/ in final syllables.
/u/ normally became /o/ in a final syllable except when absolutely word-final.
In medial syllables, short /æ, a, e/ are deleted; short /i, u/ are deleted following a long syllable but usually remain following a short syllable (except in some present-tense verb forms), merging to /e/ in the process; and long vowels are shortened.
/ø, ø:/ are unrounded to /e, e:/, respectively. This occurred within the literary period.
Some Old English dialects retained the rounded vowels, however.
Early pre-cluster shortening: Vowels were shortened when falling immediately before either three consonances or the combination of two consonants and two additional syllables in the word.
Thus, OE g?st > ModE ghost, but OE g?stli? > ModE ghastly (? > ?/_CCC) and OE cr?st > ModE Christ, but OE cr?stesmæsse > ModE Christmas (? > ?/_CC$$).
Probably occurred in the seventh century as evidenced by eighth century Anglo-Saxon missionaries' translation into Old Low German, "Gospel" as Gotspel, lit. "God news" not expected *Guotspel, "Good news" due to g?dspell > g?dspell.
// and /iu/ were lowered to // and /eo/ between 800 and 900 AD.
Initial /?/ became /?/ in late Old English. This occurred within the literary period, as evidenced by shifting patterns in alliterative verse.
Until Middle English
This period is estimated to be c. 900-1400.
Homorganic lengthening: Vowels were lengthened before /ld/, /mb/, /nd/, /rd/, probably also //, /rl/, /rn/, when not followed by a third consonant or two consonants and two syllables.
This probably occurred around AD 1000.
Later on, many of these vowels were shortened again; but evidence from the Ormulum shows that this lengthening was once quite general.
Remnants persist in the Modern English pronunciations of words such as child (but not children, since a third consonant follows), field (plus yield, wield, shield), old (but not alderman as it is followed by at least two syllables), climb, find (plus mind, kind, bind, etc.), long and strong (but not length and strength), fiend, found (plus hound, bound, etc.).
Pre-cluster shortening: Vowels were shortened when followed by two or more consonants, except when lengthened as above.
This occurred in two stages, the first stage occurring already in late Old English and affecting only vowels followed by three or more consonants, or two or more consonants when two syllables followed (an early form of trisyllabic laxing).
Diphthong smoothing: Inherited height-harmonic diphthongs were monophthongized by the loss of the second component, with the length remaining the same.
/æ:/ (from Old English /æ:, æ?/) and /?:/ became /?:/ and /?:/, respectively.
/æ/ (from Old English /æ, æ/) and /?/ merged into /a/.
New front-rounded /ø/ and /ø:/ (from Old English /, eo/) were unrounded to /e/ and /e:/.
/y/ and /y:/ were unrounded to /i/ and /i:/.
/?/ became /w/ or /j/, depending on surrounding vowels.
New diphthongs formed from vowels followed by /w/ or /j/ (including from former /?/).
Length distinctions were eliminated in these diphthongs, yielding diphthongs /ai, ?i, ei, au, ?u, eu, iu, ?u, ou/ plus /?i, ui/ borrowed from French.
Middle English breaking: Diphthongs also formed by the insertion of a glide /w/ or /j/ (after back and front vowels, respectively) preceding /x/.
Mergers of new diphthongs:
Early on, high-mid diphthongs were raised: /ei/ merged with /i:/ (hence eye < OE e rhymes with rye < *ri?e < OE ry?e), /ou/ merged with /u:/ and /eu/ merged with /iu/ (hence rue < OE hr?o?an rhymes with hue < OE h and new < OE ne).
The /t?s/ cluster, present in words imported from Norman, is deaffricated, and merges with /s/ (which had perhaps been apical in medieval times, as in closely related Dutch and Low German), thus merging sell and cell.
But unlike French, /t/ and /d/ are fully preserved.
/al/ and /?l/ when not followed by a vowel undergo mutations:
Before /k/, a coronal consonant or word-finally, they are diphthongized to /aul/ and /?ul/. (By later changes, they become /?:l/ and /oul/, as in modern salt, tall, bolt, roll.) After this, the combinations /aulk/ and /?ulk/ lose their /l/ in most accents, affecting words like talk, caulk, and folk. Words acquired after this change (such as talc) were not affected.
Before /f, v/, the /l/ becomes silent, so that half and calf are pronounced with /af/, and salve and halve are pronounced with /av/. /?lv/ is exempt, so that solve keeps its /l/. /?lf/ is not wholly exempt, as the traditional pronunciation of golf was [f].
Before /m/, /al, ?l/ become /?:, o:/, as in alms, balm, calm, palm; Holmes.
Some words have irregular pronunciations, e.g. from non-standard dialects (salmon) or spelling pronunciations (falcon in American English).
Later, the new /?:, e:/ are shifted again to /e:, i:/ in Early Modern English, causing merger of former /e:/ with /i:/; but the two are still distinguished in spelling as ea, ee. the meet-meat merger (see below)
/?n, kn/ both merge into /n/; hence gnat and Nat become homophones; likewise not and knot.
The foot-strut split: In southern England, /?/ becomes unrounded and eventually lowered unless preceded by a labial and followed by a non-velar. This gives put[p?t] but cut[k?t] and buck[b?k]. This distinction later become phonemicized by an influx of words shortened from /u:/ to /?/ both before (flood, blood, glove) and after (good, hood, book, soot, took) this split.
Ng-coalescence: Reduction of // in most areas produces new phoneme /?/.
In some words, /tj, sj, dj, zj/ coalesce to produce /t?, ?, d?/, and the new phoneme /?/, a sound change known as yod-coalescence, a type of palatalization: nature, mission, procedure, vision.
These combinations mostly occurred in borrowings from French and Latin.
Pronunciation of -tion was /sj?n/ from Old French/sjon/, thus becoming /n/.
This sound mutation still occurs allophonically in Modern English: did you/'d?dju:/ -> ['d?d?u:]didjou.
/?/ as in lot, top, and fox, is lowered towards /?/.
Long vowels /e:, u:/, from ME/?:, o:/, inconsistently shortened, especially before /t, d, ?, ð/: sweat, head, bread, breath, death, leather, weather
Shortening of /u:/ occurred at differing time periods, both before and after the centralizing of /?/ to /?/; hence blood/bl?d/ versus good/d/: also foot, soot, blood, good.
The Meet-meat merger /e:/ (ea) raises to /i:/ (ee) Thus Meet and meat become homophones in most accents. Words with (ea) that were shortened (see above) avoided the merger, also some words like steak and great simply remained with an /e:/ (which later becomes /e?/ in most varieties) merging with words like name, so now death, great, and meat have three different vowels.
Changes affect short vowels in many varieties before an /r/ at the end of a word or before a consonant
/a/ as in start and /?/ as in north are lengthened.
/?, ?, ?, ?/(the last of these often deriving from earlier before w, as in worm and "word") merge before /r/, so all varieties of ModE except for some Scottish English and some Irish English have the same vowel in fern, fir and fur.
Also affects vowels in derived forms, so that starry no longer rhymes with marry.
/a/, as in cat and trap, fronted to [æ] in many areas. In certain other words it becomes /?:/, for example father/'f?:ð?r/. /?:/ is actually a new phoneme deriving from this and words like calm (see above).
/u:/ becomes /?/ in many words spelt oo: for example, book, wool, good, foot. This is partially resisted in the northern and western variants of English English, where words ending in -ook might still use /u:/.
/æ/ raising: raising, lengthening or diphthongization of [æ] in some varieties of American English in particular contexts, especially before nasal consonants, resulting in [e?, , æ?]. Some linguistics research suggests that /æ/ raising existed since the American colonial era, due to relic evidence of this feature in some of the Northern and Midland U.S.
Yod-dropping: loss of /j/ in some consonant clusters. Though it occurs in some environments in many British English dialects, it is most extensive in American and (in younger speakers) Canadian English.
The following table shows a possible sequence of changes for some basic vocabulary items, leading from Proto-Indo-European (PIE) to Modern English. The notation ">!" indicates an unexpected change, whereas the simple notation ">" indicates an expected change. An empty cell means no change at the given stage for the given item. Only sound changes that had an effect on one or more of the vocabulary items are shown.
Pre-Germanic unexpected changes (perhaps P-Celtic or P-Italic influences)
Final overlong vowels
Loss of final nonhigh vowels
Unstressed syllables: owo > ?, ew > ow, e > i, ji > i
NOTE: Some of the changes listed above as "unexpected" are more predictable than others. For example:
Some changes are morphological ones that move a word from a rare declension to a more common one, and hence are not so surprising: e.g. *þr? "three" >! *þriu (adding the common West Germanic feminine ending -u) and *ke:r "heart" (stem *kerd-) >! *kérd-o: (change from consonant stem to n-stem).
Some changes are assimilations that are unexpected but of a cross-linguistically common type, e.g. fø:w?r "four" >! fow?r where **few?r would be expected by normal sound change. Assimilations involving adjacent numbers are especially common, e.g. *k?etw?r "four" >! *petw?r by assimilation to *pénk?e "five" (in addition, /k?/ > /p/ is a cross-linguistically common sound change in general).
On the other extreme, the Early Modern English change of o:n "one" >! w?n is almost completely mysterious. Note that the related words alone ( < all + one) and only ( < one + -ly) did not change.
Summary of vowel developments
Development of Middle English vowels
This table describes the main historical developments of English vowels in the last 1000 years, beginning with late Old English and focusing on the Middle English and Modern English changes leading to the current forms. It provides a lot of detail about the changes taking place in the last 600 years (since Middle English), while omitting any detail in the Old English and earlier periods. For more detail about the changes in the first millennium AD, see the section on the development of Old English vowels.
The table is organized around the pronunciation of Late Middle English c. 1400 AD (the time of Chaucer) and the modern spelling system, which dates from the same time and closely approximates the pronunciation of the time. Modern English spelling originates in the spelling conventions of Middle English scribes and its modern form was largely determined by William Caxton, the first English printer (beginning in 1476).
As an example, the vowel spelled ⟨a⟩ corresponds to two Middle English pronunciations: /a/ in most circumstances, but long /a:/ in an open syllable, i.e. followed by a single consonant and then a vowel, notated aCV in the spelling column. (This discussion ignores the effect of trisyllabic laxing.) The lengthened variant is due to the Early Middle English process of open-syllable lengthening; this is indicated by (leng.). Prior to that time, both vowels were pronounced the same, as a short vowel /a/; this is reflected by the fact that there is a single merged field corresponding to both Middle English sounds in the Late Old English column (the first column). However, this earlier Middle English vowel /a/ is itself the merger of a number of different Anglian Old English sounds:
the short vowels indicated in Old English spelling as ⟨a⟩, ⟨æ⟩ and ⟨ea⟩;
the long equivalents ⟨?⟩, ⟨?a⟩, and often ⟨?⟩ when directly followed by two or more consonants (indicated by ?+CC, ?+CC, etc.);
occasionally, the long vowel ⟨?⟩ when directly followed by two consonants, particularly when this vowel corresponded to West Saxon Old English ⟨?⟩. (Middle English, and hence Modern English, largely derives from the Anglian dialect of Old English, but some words are derived from the West Saxon dialect of Old English, because the border between the two dialects ran through the London area. The West Saxon dialect, not the Anglian dialect, is the "standard" dialect described in typical reference works on Old English.)
Moving forward in time, the two Middle English vowels /a/ and /a:/ correspond directly to the two vowels /a/ and /?:/, respectively, in the Early Modern English of c. 1600 AD (the time of Shakespeare). However, each vowel has split into a number of different pronunciations in Modern English, depending on the phonological context. The short /a/, for example, has split into seven different vowels, all still spelled ⟨a⟩ but pronounced differently:
/æ/ when not in any of the contexts indicated below, as in man, sack, wax, etc.
A vowel pronounced /?:/ in General American (GA) and /?/ in Received Pronunciation (RP) when preceded by /w/ and not followed by the velar consonants /k/, /?/ or /?/, as in swan, wash, wallow, etc. (General American is the standard pronunciation in the U.S. and Received Pronunciation is the most prestigious pronunciation in Britain. In both cases, these are the pronunciations typically found in news broadcasts and among the middle and upper classes.)
/?:r/ (GA) or /?:/ (RP) when followed by a written ⟨r⟩, as in hard, car, etc. (This does not include words like care, where the ⟨a⟩ was pronounced as long /a:/ in Middle English.)
But /?:r/ (GA) or /?:/ (RP) when both preceded by /w/ and followed by written ⟨r⟩, as in war, swarm, etc.
/?:/ when followed by an /l/ plus either a consonant or the end of a word, as in small, walk, etc. (In the case of walk, talk, chalk, etc. the /l/ has dropped out, but this is not indicated here. Words like rally, shallow and swallow are not covered here because the /l/ is followed by a vowel; instead, earlier rules apply. Nor are words like male covered, which had long /a:/ in Middle English.)
/?:/ when followed by /lm/, as in palm, calm, etc. (The /l/ has dropped out in pronunciation.)
In RP only, the pronunciation /?:/ is often found when followed by an unvoicedfricative, i.e. /f/, /s/ or /?/ (but not /?/), as in glass, after, path, etc. This does not apply to GA and also unpredictably does not affect a number of words of the same form, e.g. crass, math, etc.
NOTE: In this table, abbreviations are used as follows:
OE b?tan > but; OE str?tian > ME strouten > to strut
This table describes the main developments of Middle Englishdiphthongs, starting with the Old English sound sequences that produced them (sequences of vowels and g, h or ?) and ending with their Modern English equivalents. Many special cases have been ignored.
Note: V means "any vowel"; C means "any consonant"; # means "end of word".
This table only describes the changes in accented syllables. Vowel changes in unaccented syllables were very different and much more extensive. In general:
In Old English, long vowels were reduced to short vowels (and sometimes deleted entirely) and short vowels were very often deleted. All remaining vowels were reduced to only the vowels /u/, /a/ and /e/, and sometimes /o/. (/o/ also sometimes appears as a variant of unstressed /u/.)
Unstressed vowels in Modern English other than those spelled <e> are due either to compounds or to borrowed words (especially from Latin and Old French).
NOTE: The Old English words in this table are given in their Anglian form, since this is the form that underlies Modern English. However, standard Old English was based on the West Saxon dialect, and when the two dialects differ, the West Saxon form is indicated with a WS in parentheses following the Anglian form.
NOTE: In this table, abbreviations are used as follows:
1A + separates the sounds that produced the Proto-Germanic vowels in question from the sounds that formed the conditioning environment. The notation C* means a sequence of zero or more consonants.
2I-umlaut refers to a sound change that took place around 500 AD with pervasive effects on English vowels. Specifically, vowels were fronted or raised whenever an /i/ or /j/ followed in the next syllable. Nearly every vowel was affected. Affected vocabulary is shown in a different color.
3PIE n? and n?H became Proto-Germanicun; similarly for m?, l? and r?. K refers to either of the PIE sounds ? or k, which fell together in Proto-Germanic and the other Centum languages; or to any of the nine PIE velars when followed directly by a voiceless consonant (especially t). H refers to any laryngeal sound. The ogonek (e.g. ?, ?) indicates a nasal vowel. Long vowels are noted with a macron (e.g. ?, ?). Extralong vowels are noted with a circumflex (e.g. ô).