Moldavian Dialect
Get Moldavian Dialect essential facts below. View Videos or join the Moldavian Dialect discussion. Add Moldavian Dialect to your topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Moldavian Dialect

The Moldavian dialect (subdialectul / graiul moldovean / moldovenesc) is one of several dialects of the Romanian language (Daco-Romanian). It is spoken across the approximate area of the historical region of Moldavia, now split between the Republic of Moldova, Romania and Ukraine.

The delimitation of the Moldavian dialect, as with all other Romanian dialects, is made primarily by analyzing its phonetic features and only marginally by morphological, syntactical, and lexical characteristics.

The Moldavian dialect is the representative of the northern grouping of Romanian dialects and has influenced the Romanian spoken over large areas of Transylvania.

The Moldavian and the Wallachian dialects are the only two that have been consistently identified and recognized by linguists. They are clearly distinct in dialect classifications made by Heimann Tiktin, Mozes Gaster, Gustav Weigand, Sextil Pu?cariu, Sever Pop, Emil Petrovici, Romulus Todoran, Ion Coteanu, Alexandru Philippide, Iorgu Iordan, Emanuel Vasiliu, and others, whereas the other dialects have been considerably more controversial and difficult to classify.

The Moldavian dialect is not synonymous with Moldovan language. The latter is another term for the Romanian language as used in the Republic of Moldova. The border between Romania and the Republic of Moldova does not correspond to any significant isoglosses to justify a dialectal division; phonetics and morphology (which normally define dialectal classifications) are nearly identical across the border, whereas lexical differences are minimal.[1]

Geographic distribution

Major varieties (graiuri) of the Romanian language

The Moldavian dialect is spoken in the northeastern part of Romania, the Republic of Moldova, and small areas of Ukraine. It is the only Romance variety spoken east of the Eastern Carpathians. In detail, its distribution area covers the following administrative or historical regions:

Transitional areas

Transitional varieties of the Moldavian dialect are found in areas of contact with the other dialects. As such, Moldavian features often occur outside the historical Moldavia: in northern Dobruja, in northeastern Muntenia, and in north-east Transylvania.


Phonetic features

The Moldavian dialect has the following phonetic particularities that contrast it with the other Romanian dialects:

  • The postalveolar affricates [t, d] become the fricatives [?, ?]: ['?ap?, '?in?, '?eni] for standard ceap?, cin?, gene (they are not also palatalized like in the Banat dialect). As a consequence, the affricate [d] and the fricative [?] merge into the latter: [?ok, 's?n?i] for joc, sânge.[2] However, the Atlasul lingvistic român (1938-1942) and other field works record examples of pronunciations showing that, while the merger covers most of the dialect area, it is not systematic and sometimes found in free variation. In parts of the south-western and north-eastern Moldavia the distinction is preserved.[3]
  • After the fricatives [s, z, ?, ?] and the affricate [t?s] (sometimes also after [r]), a vowel shift occurs that changes [e] into [?], [i] into [?], and [e?a] into [a]: [s?mn, 'sur, 'sar?, z?r, z?d, 'zam?, 'li, ra'n?, 'li, t?s?s, 't?sap?n, r] for semn, singur, sear?, zer, zid, zeam?, ?ale, rin?, jale, ?es, ?eap?n, reci. In the same phonetic contexts, the phoneme /?/, which is generally responsible for indicating the plural in nouns and adjectives or the second person in verbs, is no longer realized: [pa'rint?s, vjez] (for standard p?rin?i, vezi). As a consequence, the number distinction is completely lost in some nouns and adjectives, such as mo?, lene?, col?, ursuz.
  • After the labial [v], [e] changes into [?] and [e?a] into [a]: [lo'v?sk, s? lo'vask?] for lovesc, s? loveasc?.
  • Word-final [?] becomes [?]: ['mam?, 'kas?] for mam?, cas?.
  • Unstressed [o] closes to [u]: [akupi'rit] for acoperit (rare).
  • The diphthong [o?a] is preserved: ['so?ari, 'bo?al?] for soare, boal?.
  • Unstressed [e] in middle and final positions closes to [i]: ['lapti, dis'fak] for lapte, desfac.
  • In the northern areas, the vowel [?] immediately before the stress opens to [a]: [ma'?ar, ba'tr?n, ta'kut, pa'duri] for m?gar, b?trân, t?cut, p?dure.
  • The diphthong [ja] becomes [je]: [b?'jet, ku'jet] for b?iat, încuiat.
  • Etymologic [?] is preserved in the words ['k?ni, 'm?ni, m?n?, 'p?ni] for câine, mâine, mâini, pâine.
  • The labials [p, b, m] receive a palatalized pronunciation when followed by front vowels and become [c, ?, ?], respectively: [ko'k?il, 'ini, n?el] for copil, bine, miel.
  • Similarly, the palatalization of the labio-dentals [f, v] occurs, but in two different ways. In the southern half of the dialect area they become [ç, ?], respectively, whereas in the northern half they become [?, ?]: ['h?erbi / 'erbi, i't?s?l / i't?s?l] for fierbe, vi?el.
  • The dentals [t, d, n] are left unchanged before [e, i, e?a]: ['frunti, di'parti, de?al, 'ne?ru, 'ne?a?r?].
  • The affricate [d?z] occurs, as in [d?z?k], as in the Banat dialect, the Maramure? dialect and the Aromanian language, whereas it evolved to [z] in the Wallachian dialect, the Cri? dialect, and standard Romanian:[4] [d?z?k] for zic (Latin dico).
  • The diphthong [e?a] in final positions becomes the monophthong [?]: [a'v?, spu'n?] for avea, spunea.
  • Asyllabic versions of [i] and [u] occur in word-final positions: [p?du'rar?, ko?o'kar] for p?durar, cojocar.
  • In the northern part, [v] followed by [o, u] changes into [h]: holbur?, hulpe, hultan (compare with standard volbur?, vulpe, vultan).

Morphological features

  • Feminine nouns ending in -c? have genitive and dative forms ending in -c?i: maic?i, puic?i (compare with standard maicii, puicii).
  • The noun tat? "father" with the definite article has the form tatul (standard tat?l).
  • The possessive article is invariable: a meu, a mea, a mei, a mele ("mine", standard al meu, a mea, ai mei, ale mele).
  • The number distinction is made in verbs in the imperfect at the 3rd person: era / erau, f?cea / f?ceau (like in the standard language).
  • The simple perfect is not used, except rarely, only in the 3rd person, with the simple value of a past tense.
  • The auxiliary for the compound perfect has the same form for both the singular and the plural of the 3rd person: el o fost / ei o fost ("he was / they were", standard el a fost, ei au fost).
  • In northern Moldavia, the pluperfect is also made analytically: m-am fost dus, am fost venit ("I had gone, I had come", standard m? dusesem, venisem).
  • The future tense in verbs uses the infinitive and is sometimes identical to it: va veni, a veni ("he will come", standard only va veni).
  • The following subjunctive forms occur: s? deie, s? steie, s? beie, s? ieie, s? vreie (standard s? dea, s? stea, s? bea, s? ia, s? vrea).
  • The following imperatives occur: ád?, vin? (standard adú, vino).
  • When the object of a verb is another verb, the latter is in its infinitive form, including the isolated morpheme a: prinde a fierbe ("starts to boil", the standard uses the subjunctive: prinde s? fiarb? or începe s? fiarb?).
  • Genitives and datives of nouns tend to be formed analytically: d? mâncare la pisic? ("give food to the cat", standard d? mâncare pisicii).

Lexical particularities

  • Some words have preserved archaic forms: îmblu, împlu, întru, înflu, nour, dirept and sînt (compare with standard umblu, umplu, intru, umflu, nor, drept and sunt).
  • A particular variant for the personal pronoun for the 3rd person occurs frequently and is used for animates and inanimates alike: dânsul, dânsa, dân?ii, dânsele ("he, she, they" as well as "it, they", compare with el, ea, ei, ele). In the standard language, these forms have started being used as 3rd person polite pronouns.
  • The demonstrative pronouns have particular forms: [a'ista, a'jasta, a'?ela, a'?eja] ("this" masculine and feminine, "that" masculine and feminine; compare with standard acesta, aceasta, acela, aceea).
  • Other specific words: om?t ("snow", z?pad?), agud? ("mulberry", dud?), poame ("grapes", struguri), perje ("plums", prune), ciubot? ("high boot", cizm?), cori ("measles", pojar), etc.


Moldavian dialect: [j? a'v? 'dow? va s? ?i'raw 'waminij di 'va?ili jij k? d?'dew 'un ?jub?'ra? di 'lapti ? a' di la o 'vremi st?r'kis?r? 'va?ili ? nu maj d?'dew 'lapti]

Standard Romanian: Ea avea dou? vaci ?i se mirau oamenii de vacile ei c? d?deau un ciub?ra? de lapte. ?i a?a de la o vreme stârpiser? vacile, nu mai d?deau lapte.

English translation: "She had two cows and people were amazed at her cows for giving a bucketful of milk. And so from a while the cows became dry, they stopped giving milk."


  1. ^ Vasile Pavel, Limba român? - unitate în diversitate, Limba român?, nr. 9-10, 2008 (in Romanian)
  2. ^ Tratat de dialectologie româneasc?, Editura ?tiin?ific? ?i Enciclopedic?, Bucharest, 1984, p. 213 (in Romanian)
  3. ^ Atlasul lingvistic român, edited by Sextil Puscariu, Cluj, 1938 (part I1); Sibiu, Leipzig 1942 (part I2), Sibiu, Leipzig, 1940, (part II1), Sibiu, Leipzig 1942, (supplement to part II1) (in Romanian)
  4. ^ Matilda Caragiu-Mario?eanu, Compendiu de dialectologie român?, Editura ?tiin?ific? ?i Enciclopedic?, 1975, p. 90 (in Romanian)


Further reading

See also

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Music Scenes