Get Intercultural Competence essential facts below. View Videos or join the Intercultural Competence discussion. Add Intercultural Competence to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Cultural competence, also known as intercultural competence, is a continuous and life long journey to increase people's skills in being proficient in intercultural and intracultural knowledge which can improve the ability to work with people with different culture.
Effective intercultural communication relates to behaviors that culminate with the accomplishment of the desired goals of the interaction and all parties involved in the situation. Appropriate intercultural communication includes behaviors that suit the expectations of a specific culture, the characteristics of the situation, and the level of the relationship between the parties involved in the situation.
Individuals who are effective and appropriate in intercultural situations display high levels of cultural self-awareness and understand the influence of culture on behavior, values, and beliefs. Cognitive processes imply the understanding of situational and environmental aspects of intercultural interactions and the application of intercultural awareness, which is affected by the understanding of the self and own culture. Self-awareness in intercultural interactions requires self-monitoring to censor anything not acceptable to another culture. Cultural sensitivity or cultural awareness leads the individual to an understanding of how their own culture determines feelings, thoughts, and personality.
Affective processes define the emotions that span during intercultural interactions. These emotions are strongly related to self-concept, open-mindedness, non-judgementalism, and social relaxation. In general, positive emotions generate respect for other cultures and their differences. Behavioral processes refer to how effectively and appropriately the individual directs actions to achieve goals. Actions during intercultural interactions are influenced by the ability to clearly convey a message, proficiency with the foreign language, flexibility and management of behavior, and social skills.
History in American ethnic studies
Despite the diverse ethnic composition of the U.S. and the challenges to many minority groups, the dominant models of education and social services retained models developed by northern and western European intellectuals through the early 1950s. Even such well-meaning and important reformers as Jane Addams and Jacob Riis followed northern and western European intellectual perspectives. After the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, though, social workers, activists, and even healthcare providers began to examine their practices to see if they were as effective in African American, Latino, and even Asian American communities in the U.S. The arrival of more than half a million Southeast Asianrefugees, from 1975 to 1992, for example, tested the ability of medical and social workers to continue effective practice among speakers of other languages and among those coming from very different understandings of everything from mental health to charity.
Creating intercultural competence
Intercultural competence is determined by the presence of cognitive, affective, and behavioral abilities that directly shape communication across cultures. These essential abilities can be separated into five specific skills that are obtained through education and experience:
Mindfulness: the ability of being cognitively aware of how the communication and interaction with others is developed. It is important to focus more in the process of the interaction than its outcome while maintaining in perspective the desired communication goals. For example, it would be better to formulate questions such as "What can I say or do to help this process?" rather than "What do they mean?"
Cognitive flexibility: the ability of creating new categories of information rather than keeping old categories. This skill includes opening to new information, taking more than one perspective, and understanding personal ways of interpreting messages and situations.
Tolerance for ambiguity: the ability to maintain focus in situations that are not clear rather than becoming anxious and to methodically determine the best approach as the situation evolves. Generally, low-tolerance individuals look for information that supports their beliefs while high-tolerance individuals look for information that gives an understanding of the situation and others.
Behavioral flexibility: the ability to adapt and accommodate behaviors to a different culture. Although knowing a second language could be important for this skill, it does not necessarily translate into cultural adaptability. The individual must be willing to assimilate the new culture.
Cross-cultural empathy: the ability to visualize with the imagination the situation of another person from an intellectual and emotional point of view. Demonstrating empathy includes the abilities of connecting emotionally with people, showing compassion, thinking in more than one perspective, and listening actively.
The assessment of cross-cultural competence is a field that is rife with controversy. One survey identified 86 assessment instruments for 3C. A United States Army Research Institute study narrowed the list down to ten quantitative instruments that were suitable for further exploration of their reliability and validity.
Research in the area of 3C assessment, while thin, points to the value of qualitative assessment instruments in concert with quantitative ones. Qualitative instruments, such as scenario-based assessments, are useful for gaining insight into intercultural competence.
With the larger population of minorities and racial integration during the 1960s and 1970s, the public school system of the United States had to grapple with issues of cultural sensitivity as most teachers in public school system came from white, middle class backgrounds. Most of these teachers were educated, primarily English speaking, and primarily from the Western European cultures. They often had trouble trying to communicate with speakers of limited English proficiency, let alone people of vastly different value systems and normative behaviors from that of Anglo-European culture. The purpose of training educators and others in the area of cultural competence is to provide new teachers the background and skills to work effectively with children of all backgrounds and social classes.
With the growing diversity of the student body in U.S. public school, it is increasingly imperative that teachers have and continually develop a cultural competence that enables them to connect with, respond to, and interact effectively with their pupils. The achievement gap between cultural minority and majority students suggests a communication disconnect often occurs in minority classrooms because cultural mismatch between teachers and students is common and should not prevent positive, productive for both parties, provided the educator is a culturally competent communicator. Over the last few decades, scholars have increasingly shown interest in the relationship between learning, reading, schema, and culture. People's schema depends on their social location, which, as Anderson explains, includes a reader's age, sex, race, religion, nationality, and occupation, amongst other factors. Considering schemata determine how people understand, interpret, and analyze everything in their world, it is clear that background and experience really do affect the learning and teaching processes, and how each should be approached in context. "In short," Anderson says, "the schema that will be brought to bear on a text depends upon the reader's culture". More simply, Anderson describes a person's schema as their "organized knowledge about the world". In considering the role of schema, one of the educator's principal functions in teaching, particularly with literacy, is to "'bridge the gap between what the learner already knows and what he needs to know before |pp=he can successfully learn the task at hand'". This is important because Staton explains that student learning--i.e. successful communication between instructor and pupil--occurs when teachers and students come to "shared understandings". Thus, teachers must remember that they are "cultural workers, not neutral professionals using skills on a culturally-detached playing field".
Teachers and administrators in the public school systems of the United States come in contact with a wide variety of sub-cultures and are at the forefront of the challenge of bringing diverse groups together within a larger American society. Issues confronting teachers and administrators on a daily basis include student learning disabilities, student behavioral problems, child abuse, drug addiction, mental health, and poverty, most of which are handled differently within different cultures and communities.
Examples of cultural conflicts often seen by teachers in the public school system include:
role of women in the family and the decisions they can make
The provision of culturally tailored health care can improve patient outcomes. In 2005, California passed Assembly Bill 1195 that requires patient-related continuing medical education courses in Californiamedical school to incorporate cultural and linguistic competence training in order to qualify for certification credits. In 2011, HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research implemented the EBAN Experience(TM) program to reduce health disparities among minority populations, most notably East African immigrants.
Cross-cultural competence (3C) has generated confusing and contradictory definitions because it has been studied by a wide variety of academic approaches and professional fields. One author identified eleven different terms that have some equivalence to 3C: cultural savvy, astuteness, appreciation, literacy or fluency, adaptability, terrain, expertise, competency, awareness, intelligence, and understanding. The United States Army Research Institute, which is currently engaged in a study of 3C has defined it as "A set of cognitive, behavioral, and affective/motivational components that enable individuals to adapt effectively in intercultural environments".
Organizations in academia, business, health care, government security, and developmental aid agencies have all sought to use 3C in one way or another. Poor results have often been obtained due to a lack of rigorous study of 3C and a reliance on "common sense" approaches.
Cross-cultural competence does not operate in a vacuum, however. One theoretical construct posits that 3C, language proficiency, and regional knowledge are distinct skills that are inextricably linked, but to varying degrees depending on the context in which they are employed. In educational settings, Bloom's affective and cognitive taxonomies serve as an effective framework for describing the overlapping areas among these three disciplines: at the receiving and knowledge levels, 3C can operate with near-independence from language proficiency and regional knowledge. But, as one approaches the internalizing and evaluation levels, the overlapping areas approach totality.
The development of intercultural competence is mostly based on the individual's experiences while he or she is communicating with different cultures. When interacting with people from other cultures, the individual experiences certain obstacles that are caused by differences in cultural understanding between two people from different cultures. Such experiences may motivate the individual to acquire skills that can help him to communicate his point of view to an audience belonging to a different cultural ethnicity and background.
Intercultural competence models
Intercultural Communicative Language Teaching Model. In response to the needs to develop EFL learners' ICC in the context of Asia, a theoretical framework, which is an instructional design (ISD) model ADDIE with five stages (Analyze - Design - Develop - Implement - Evaluate) is employed as a guideline in order to construct the ICLT model for EFL learners. The ICLT model is an on-going process of ICC acquisition. There are three parts: Language-Culture, the main training process.
(Input - Notice - Practice - Output), and the ICC, which are systematically integrated. The second part is the main part consisting of four teaching steps to facilitate learners' ICC development, and each step reflects a step of the knowledge scaffolding and constructing process to facilitate learners' ICC development.
Immigrants and international students
A salient issue, especially for people living in countries other than their native country, is the issue of which culture they should follow: their native culture or the one in their new surroundings.
International students also face this issue: they have a choice of modifying their cultural boundaries and adapting to the culture around them or holding on to their native culture and surrounding themselves with people from their own country. The students who decide to hold on to their native culture are those who experience the most problems in their university life and who encounter frequent culture shocks. But international students who adapt themselves to the culture surrounding them (and who interact more with domestic students) will increase their knowledge of the domestic culture, which may help them to "blend in" more. In the article it stated, "Segmented assimilation theorists argue that students from less affluent and racial and ethnic minority immigrant families face a number of educational hurdles and barriers that often stem from racial, ethnic, and gender biases and discrimination embedded within the U.S. public school system". Such individuals may be said to have adopted bicultural identities.
Another issue that stands out in intercultural communication is the attitude stemming from ethnocentrism. LeVine and Campbell defines ethnocentrism as people's tendency to view their culture or in-group as superior to other groups, and to judge those groups to their standards. With ethnocentric attitudes, those incapable to expand their view of different cultures could create conflict between groups. Ignorance to diversity and cultural groups contributes to prevention of peaceful interaction in a fast-paced globalizing world. The counterpart of ethnocentrism is ethnorelativism: the ability to see multiple values, beliefs, norms etc. in the world as cultural rather than universal; being able to understand and accept different cultures as equally valid as ones' own. It is a mindset that moves beyond in-group out-group to see all groups as equally important and valid and individuals to be seen in terms of their own cultural context.
According to Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory, cultural characteristics can be measured along several dimensions. The ability to perceive them and to cope with them is fundamental for intercultural competence. These characteristics include:
Cultures value persistence, thriftiness, and humility
People sacrifice immediate gratification for long-term commitments
Cultures believe that past results do not guarantee for the future and are aware of change
Polychronic cultures are China, Japan, Brazil, and India
It is important[neutrality is disputed] that cross-cultural competence training and skills does not break down into the application of stereotypes. Although its goal is to promote understanding between groups of individuals that, as a whole, think differently, it may fail to recognize specific differences between individuals of any given group. Such differences can be more significant than the differences between groups, especially in the case of heterogeneous populations and value systems.
Madison (2006) has criticized the tendency of 3C training for its tendency to simplify migration and cross-cultural processes into stages and phases.
See also a recent article by Witte summarizing objections[example needed] to cultural theories used in business and social life.
^Messner, W., & Schäfer, N. (2012) The ICCA Facilitator's Manual. Intercultural Communication and Collaboration Appraisal. London: GloBus Research, p. 41 (also see: http://icca.globusresearch.com); Spitzberg, B. H. (2000). A Model of Intercultural Communication Competence. In L. A. Samovar, & R. E. Porter, Intercultural Communication - A Reader (pp. 375-87). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
^ abcdefghijDeardorff, D. K. (2009). The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.[page needed]
^ abcdefghijklmLustig, M. W., & Koester, J. (2003). Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures (4th ed.). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.[page needed]
^ abcLiu, Shuang (1 July 2014). "Becoming intercultural: exposure to foreign cultures and intercultural competence". China Media Research. 10 (3): 7-15. GaleA381285571.
^Ciairano, Silvia; Bonino, S; Miceli, Renato (September 2006). "Cognitive flexibility and social competence from childhood to early adolescence". Cogni?ie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior. 10 (3): 343-366. hdl:2318/38080.
^Carrard, Valérie; Schmid Mast, Marianne (October 2015). "Physician behavioral adaptability: A model to outstrip a 'one size fits all' approach". Patient Education and Counseling. 98 (10): 1243-1247. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.028. PMID26277827.
^Chung, Rita Chi-Ying; Bemak, Fred (April 2002). "The Relationship of Culture and Empathy in Cross-Cultural Counseling". Journal of Counseling & Development. 80 (2): 154-159. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00178.x.
^"Paul B. Pedersen: Award for distinguished contributions to the international advancement of psychology". American Psychologist. 65 (8): 839-854. 2010. doi:10.1037/a0020916. PMID21058802.
^Kitsantas, Anastasia (1 September 2004). "Studying abroad: the role of college students' goals on the development of cross-cultural skills and global understanding". College Student Journal. 38 (3): 441-453. GaleA123321904.
^Lievens, Filip; Harris, Michael M.; Van Keer, Etienne; Bisqueret, Claire (2003). "Predicting cross-cultural training performance: The validity of personality, cognitive ability, and dimensions measured by an assessment center and a behavior description interview". Journal of Applied Psychology. 88 (3): 476-489. CiteSeerX10.1.1.465.896. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.476. PMID12814296.
^Davis, B. (1993). Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.[page needed]
^Doll, W. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teacher's College Press.[page needed]
^English, F. & Larson, R. (1996). Curriculum management for educational and social service organizations. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.[page needed]
^Palomba, A. & Banta, T. (1999). Assessment essentials. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[page needed]
^Messner, W. & Schäfer, N. (2012). The ICCA(TM) Facilitator's Manual London: Createspace.[page needed]
^"What is The ICCA?". Intercultural Communication and Collaboration Appraisal. GloBus Research Ltd. Retrieved 2012.
^Campinha-Bacote, Josepha (July 2002). "The Process of Cultural Competence in the Delivery of Healthcare Services: A Model of Care". Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 13 (3): 181-184. doi:10.1177/10459602013003003.
^ abSelmeski, B.R. (2007). Military cross-cultural competence: Core concepts and individual development. Kingston: Royal Military College of Canada Centre for Security, Armed Forces, & Society.[page needed]
^Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.[page needed]
^Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: McKay Co., Inc.[page needed]
^Bondy, Jennifer M.; Peguero, Anthony A.; Johnson, Brent E. (June 2017). "The Children of Immigrants' Academic Self-Efficacy: The Significance of Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Segmented Assimilation". Education and Urban Society. 49 (5): 486-517. doi:10.1177/0013124516644049. S2CID147292269.
^LeVine and Campbell, cited in Lin, Yang; Rancer, Andrew S. (January 2003). "Ethnocentrism, intercultural communication apprehension, intercultural willingness-to-communicate, and intentions to participate in an intercultural dialogue program: Testing a proposed model". Communication Research Reports. 20 (1): 62-72. doi:10.1080/08824090309388800. S2CID144311978.
Anderson, R. C. (1984). "Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory". Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts. Laurence Earlbaum Associates. pp. 373-383.
Anderson, MR; Moscou, S (March 1998). "Race and ethnicity in research on infant mortality". Family Medicine. 30 (3): 224-227. PMID9532447.
Blanchett, Wanda J.; Mumford, Vincent; Beachum, Floyd (March 2005). "Urban School Failure and Disproportionality in a Post-Brown Era: Benign Neglect of the Constitutional Rights of Students of Color". Remedial and Special Education. 26 (2): 70-81. doi:10.1177/07419325050260020201. S2CID145367875.
Chamberlain, Steven P. (March 2005). "Recognizing and Responding to Cultural Differences in the Education of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners". Intervention in School and Clinic. 40 (4): 195-211. doi:10.1177/10534512050400040101. S2CID145410246.
Groh, Arnold A. (2018) Research Methods in Indigenous Contexts. Springer, New York. ISBN978-3-319-72774-5
Hayunga, E.G., Pinn, V.W. (1999) NIH Policy on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. 5-17-99
Krieger, Nancy; Rowley, Diane L.; Herman, Allen A.; Avery, Byllye; Phillips, Mona T. (November 1993). "Racism, Sexism, and Social Class: Implications for Studies of Health, Disease, and Well-being". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 9 (6): 82-122. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30666-4. PMID8123288.
Macaulay, A.C., el. al. (1999) Responsible Research with Communities: Participatory Research in Primary Care. North America Primary Care Research Group Policy Statement.
Mercedes Martin & Billy E. Vaughn (2007). Strategic Diversity & Inclusion Management magazine, pp. 31-36. DTUI Publications Division: San Francisco, CA.
Moule, Jean (2012). Cultural Competence: A primer for educators. Wadsworth/Cengage, Belmont, California.
Nine-Curt, Carmen Judith. (1984) Non-verbal Communication in Puerto Rico. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sea, M.C., et al. (1994) Latino Cultural Values: Their Role in Adjustment to Disability. Psychological Perspectives on Disability. Select Press CA
Staton, Ann Q. (October 1989). "The interface of communication and instruction: Conceptual considerations and programmatic manifestations". Communication Education. 38 (4): 364-371. doi:10.1080/03634528909378777.
Stavans, I. (1995) The Hispanic Condition: Reflections on Culture and Identity in America. Harper Collins
Stuart, Richard B. (2004). "Twelve Practical Suggestions for Achieving Multicultural Competence". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 35 (1): 3-9. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.35.1.3.
Tran, T. Q.; Seepho, S. (2016). An intercultural communicative competence model for EFL learners. Conference Proceedings of the 4th TESOL: Teaching Methodologies and Learning Outcomes. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. pp. 27-42.