Get Arthur Oncken Lovejoy essential facts below. View Videos or join the Arthur Oncken Lovejoy discussion. Add Arthur Oncken Lovejoy to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
As a professor of philosophy at Johns Hopkins University from 1910 to 1938, Lovejoy founded and long presided over that university's History of Ideas Club, where many prominent and budding intellectual and social historians, as well as literary critics, gathered. In 1940 he co-founded the Journal of the History of Ideas with Philip P. Wiener. Lovejoy insisted that the history of ideas should focus on "unit ideas," single concepts (namely simple concepts sharing an abstract name with other concepts that were to be conceptually distinguished). Abstract nouns like 'pragmatism' 'idealism', 'rationalism' and the like were, in Lovejoy's view, constituted by distinct, analytically separate ideas, which the historian of the genealogy of ideas had to thresh out, and show how the basic unit ideas combine and recombine with each other over time. The idea has, according to Simo Knuuttila, exercised a greater attraction on literary critics than on philosophers.
Lovejoy was active in the public arena. He helped found the American Association of University Professors and the Maryland chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. However, he qualified his belief in civil liberties to exclude what he considered threats to a free system. Thus, at the height of the McCarthy Era (in the February 14, 1952, edition of the Journal of Philosophy) Lovejoy stated that, since it was a "matter of empirical fact" that membership in the Communist Party contributed "to the triumph of a world-wide organization" which was opposed to "freedom of inquiry, of opinion and of teaching," membership in the party constituted grounds for dismissal from academic positions. He also published numerous opinion pieces in the Baltimore press. He died in Baltimore on December 30, 1962.
In the domain of epistemology, Lovejoy is remembered for an influential critique of the pragmatic movement, especially in the essay "The Thirteen Pragmatisms", written in 1908.
William F. Bynum, looking back at Lovejoy's Great Chain of Being after 40 years, describes it as "a familiar feature of the intellectual landscape", indicating its great influence and "brisk" ongoing sales. Bynum argues that much more research is needed into how the concept of the great chain of being was replaced, but he agrees that Lovejoy was right that the crucial period was the end of the 18th century when "the Enlightenment's chain of being was dismantled".
^Reese, William (1996). Dictionary of philosophy and religion: Eastern and Western thought. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press. p. 428. ISBN0391038648. OCLC33983842.
^"Arthur O. Lovejoy". Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved 2020. Lovejoy studied at Harvard under William James and Josiah Royce, the empiricist and idealist antipodes of turn of the century American philosophy. Though his philosophical sympathies were closer to James', Lovejoy carried out a sustained critique of pragmatism that reverberates to this day.
^Sidney Axinn, "Wiener, Philip Paul (1905-92)", in: John R. Shook, ed., Dictionary Of Modern American Philosophers, Bristol: Thoemmes, 2005. Retrieved 17 July 2005.
^Arthur O. Lovejoy, [The Great Chain of Being,] (1936) Harper & Row 1960 pp.5ff.
^Sevick, Charles E. (1936). The Development of a Perceptual Realism. University of Wisconsin-Madison. p. 51. "Lovejoy retains what is essentially the view of space and time of nineteenth Century physics, and has been a vigorous opponent of the theory of relativity."
^Pace, Edward Aloysius; Ryan, James Hugh. (1931). The New Scholasticism. American Catholic Philosophical Association. p. 87, p. 185
^Turner, Dean; Hazelett, Richard. (1979). The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers. Hope Publishing House. pp. 4-5. ISBN9781932717051