Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology
Read Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology below. View Videos or join the Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology discussion. Add Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Talk:Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology

Progress

Showing below up to 3 results in range #1 to #3.

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Possible sources

Although there is no ID of the currently existing text, here are 2 possible source links:

~ Alcmaeonid 15:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Another source link:

Entries and sub-entries

Even if suggested in the current structure of the list of entries, in my opinion it is not appropriate to create Main ns pages dividing the same entry into sub-entries, e.g.:

when in the text they are kept under the same heading (see Page:Dictionary_of_Greek_and_Roman_Biography_and_Mythology_(1870)_-_Volume_3.djvu/123).

What is the added value in dividing into Pandion 1. and Pandion 2. when the "1" and "2" give no clue to the reader of what they mean?

I see only drawbacks:

  1. higher number of pages generated and to be maintained, with only a few words per page
  2. the greek text for the entry is displayed only in the first instance and then it is lost

Much better to keep everything together.--Mpaa (talk) 23:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Only the lead terms should be used as articles in the Mainspace. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
I agree. The pages as they are now, are meaningless. -- Ineuw talk 20:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
I disagree. The spirit of a dictionary is entries; a page per article, like now, should be the preferred method, as having other terms on the same page serves no purpose. Ithinkicahn (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Here is an example of why all the sub-entries for each article need to be kept together in a single article. Page:Ante-Nicene Christian Library Vol 2.djvu/46 refers to Antinous in this Dictionary. If there are three sub-pages formed for Antinous, then this link will remain red, even once the relevant article is present. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I created Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aburia gens and Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/C. Aburius just because I found the links in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Volume 1. I agree there is no point in breaking the entries. I suppose there is a consensus to move them in one now.Ah3kal (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Presentation of this work

As there are so many short articles in this work, the current presentation is pretty much unnavigable. I see there being two useful ways of presenting it.

  1. In the same way as DNB00

# In the same way as fr:Biographie universelle ancienne et moderne - Index Tome 1

My own preference would be the second way. It requires proofreaders to add section markers to each article, but a bot is used for transclusion. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 19:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Templates

Use {{DGRBM link}} in the author namespace to refer to articles written within this work. - DutchTreat (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Talk:Dictionary_of_Greek_and_Roman_Biography_and_Mythology
 



 



 
Music Scenes