Y-%CE%94 Transform

Get Y-%CE%94 Transform essential facts below. View Videos or join the Y-%CE%94 Transform discussion. Add Y-%CE%94 Transform to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.

## Names

## Basic Y-? transformation

### Equations for the transformation from ? to Y

### Equations for the transformation from Y to ?

## A proof of the existence and uniqueness of the transformation

## Simplification of networks

## Graph theory

## Demonstration

### ?-load to Y-load transformation equations

### Y-load to ?-load transformation equations

## See also

## Notes

## References

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Y-%CE%94 Transform

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

The **Y-? transform**, also written **wye-delta** and also known by many other names, is a mathematical technique to simplify the analysis of an electrical network. The name derives from the shapes of the circuit diagrams, which look respectively like the letter Y and the Greek capital letter ?. This circuit transformation theory was published by Arthur Edwin Kennelly in 1899.^{[1]} It is widely used in analysis of three-phase electric power circuits.

The Y-? transform can be considered a special case of the star-mesh transform for three resistors. In mathematics, the Y-? transform plays an important role in theory of circular planar graphs.^{[2]}

The **Y-? transform** is known by a variety of other names, mostly based upon the two shapes involved, listed in either order. The **Y**, spelled out as **wye**, can also be called **T** or **star**; the **?**, spelled out as **delta**, can also be called **triangle**, **?** (spelled out as **pi**), or **mesh**. Thus, common names for the transformation include **wye-delta** or **delta-wye**, **star-delta**, **star-mesh**, or **T-?**.

The transformation is used to establish equivalence for networks with three terminals. Where three elements terminate at a common node and none are sources, the node is eliminated by transforming the impedances. For equivalence, the impedance between any pair of terminals must be the same for both networks. The equations given here are valid for complex as well as real impedances.

The general idea is to compute the impedance at a terminal node of the Y circuit with impedances , to adjacent nodes in the ? circuit by

where are all impedances in the ? circuit. This yields the specific formulae

The general idea is to compute an impedance in the ? circuit by

where is the sum of the products of all pairs of impedances in the Y circuit and is the impedance of the node in the Y circuit which is opposite the edge with . The formulae for the individual edges are thus

Or, if using admittance instead of resistance:

Note that the general formula in Y to ? using admittance is similar to ? to Y using resistance.

The feasibility of the transformation can be shown as a consequence of the superposition theorem for electric circuits. A short proof, rather than one derived as a corollary of the more general star-mesh transform, can be given as follows. The equivalence lies in the statement that for any external voltages ( and ) applying at the three nodes ( and ), the corresponding currents ( and ) are exactly the same for both the Y and ? circuit, and vice versa. In this proof, we start with given external currents at the nodes. According to the superposition theorem, the voltages can be obtained by studying the superposition of the resulting voltages at the nodes of the following three problems applied at the three nodes with current:

- and

The equivalence can be readily shown by using Kirchhoff's circuit laws that . Now each problem is relatively simple, since it involves only one single ideal current source. To obtain exactly the same outcome voltages at the nodes for each problem, the equivalent resistances in the two circuits must be the same, this can be easily found by using the basic rules of series and parallel circuits:

Though usually six equations are more than enough to express three variables () in term of the other three variables(), here it is straightforward to show that these equations indeed lead to the above designed expressions.

In fact, the superposition theorem establishes the relation between the values of the resistances, the uniqueness theorem guarantees the uniqueness of such solution.

Resistive networks between two terminals can theoretically be simplified to a single equivalent resistor (more generally, the same is true of impedance). Series and parallel transforms are basic tools for doing so, but for complex networks such as the bridge illustrated here, they do not suffice.

The Y-? transform can be used to eliminate one node at a time and produce a network that can be further simplified, as shown.

The reverse transformation, ?-Y, which adds a node, is often handy to pave the way for further simplification as well.

Every two-terminal network represented by a planar graph can be reduced to a single equivalent resistor by a sequence of series, parallel, Y-?, and ?-Y transformations.^{[3]} However, there are non-planar networks that cannot be simplified using these transformations, such as a regular square grid wrapped around a torus, or any member of the Petersen family.

In graph theory, the Y-? transform means replacing a Y subgraph of a graph with the equivalent ? subgraph. The transform preserves the number of edges in a graph, but not the number of vertices or the number of cycles. Two graphs are said to be **Y-? equivalent** if one can be obtained from the other by a series of Y-? transforms in either direction. For example, the Petersen family is a Y-? equivalence class.

To relate from ? to from Y, the impedance between two corresponding nodes is compared. The impedance in either configuration is determined as if one of the nodes is disconnected from the circuit.

The impedance between *N*_{1} and *N*_{2} with *N*_{3} disconnected in ?:

To simplify, let be the sum of .

Thus,

The corresponding impedance between N_{1} and N_{2} in Y is simple:

hence:

- (1)

Repeating for :

- (2)

and for :

- (3)

From here, the values of can be determined by linear combination (addition and/or subtraction).

For example, adding (1) and (3), then subtracting (2) yields

For completeness:

- (4)
- (5)
- (6)

Let

- .

We can write the ? to Y equations as

- (1)
- (2)
- (3)

Multiplying the pairs of equations yields

- (4)
- (5)
- (6)

and the sum of these equations is

- (7)

Factor from the right side, leaving in the numerator, canceling with an in the denominator.

- (8)

Note the similarity between (8) and {(1), (2), (3)}

Divide (8) by (1)

which is the equation for . Dividing (8) by (2) or (3) (expressions for or ) gives the remaining equations.

- Star-mesh transform
- Network analysis (electrical circuits)
- Electrical network, three-phase power, polyphase systems for examples of Y and ? connections
- AC motor for a discussion of the Y-? starting technique

**^**Kennelly, A. E. (1899). "Equivalence of triangles and three-pointed stars in conducting networks".*Electrical World and Engineer*.**34**: 413-414.**^**Curtis, E.B.; Ingerman, D.; Morrow, J.A. (1998). "Circular planar graphs and resistor networks".*Linear Algebra and Its Applications*.**283**(1-3): 115-150. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(98)10087-3.**^**Truemper, K. (1989). "On the delta-wye reduction for planar graphs".*Journal of Graph Theory*.**13**(2): 141-148. doi:10.1002/jgt.3190130202.

- William Stevenson,
*Elements of Power System Analysis*3rd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1975, ISBN 0-07-061285-4

- Star-Triangle Conversion: Knowledge on resistive networks and resistors
- Calculator of Star-Triangle transform

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists