|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Magazines page.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
|WikiProject Magazines||(Rated Project-class)|
There is a discussion on the reliability of the ¡Hola! and Paris Match magazines on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at popflock.com Resource: Reliable sources/Noticeboard § ¡Hola! and Paris Match magazine. -- Newslinger talk 21:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Please consider participating at popflock.com Resource: Articles for deletion/Bicycle magazine. --Doncram (talk) 03:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
There is a request for comment on the reliability of the online magazine Sixth Tone. If you are interested, please participate at popflock.com Resource: Reliable sources/Noticeboard § RfC: Sixth Tone. -- Newslinger talk 02:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)