Get Trait Theory essential facts below. View Videos or join the Trait Theory discussion. Add Trait Theory to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Approach to the study of human personality
In psychology, trait theory (also called dispositional theory) is an approach to the study of human personality. Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion. According to this perspective, traits are aspects of personality that are relatively stable over time, differ across individuals (e.g. some people are outgoing whereas others are not), are relatively consistent over situations, and influence behavior. Traits are in contrast to states, which are more transitory dispositions.
In some theories and systems, traits are something a person either has or does not have, but in many others traits are dimensions such as extraversion vs. introversion, with each person rating somewhere along this spectrum.
There are two approaches to define traits: as internal causal properties or as purely descriptive summaries. The internal causal definition states that traits influence our behaviours, leading us to do things in line with that trait. On the other hand, traits as descriptive summaries are descriptions of our actions that don't try to infer causality.
Gordon Allport was an early pioneer in the study of traits. This early work was viewed as the beginning of the modern psychological study of personality. He also referred to traits within his work as dispositions. In his approach, "cardinal" traits are those that dominate and shape a person's behavior; their ruling passions/obsessions, such as a need for money, fame etc. By contrast, "central" traits such as honesty are characteristics found in some degree in every person - and finally "secondary" traits are those seen only in certain circumstances (such as particular likes or dislikes that a very close friend may know), which are included to provide a complete picture of human complexity.
A wide variety of alternative theories and scales were later developed, including:
Big Five personality traits, ("the five-factor model"). Many psychologists currently believe that five factors are sufficient: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness.
Trait theory in cross-cultural use
Cultures are widely known and accepted as being different in varying degrees. This can make the study of personality difficult as meaning and the expression of traits may be different within cultural groups. Trait theory uses a hierarchy of traits in order to separate culture from the traits, it can be said the culture is ignored in order to focus of the individual traits and how they are connected to the individual. Gordon Allport's trait theory not only served as a foundational approach within personality psychology, but also is continued to be viewed and discussed by other disciplines such as anthropology because of how he approached culture within trait theory.
Trait theory tends to focus on the individual over the situation in which they are in. This focus has relaxed within modern studies allowing for a consideration of the external factors outside of the self. As the focus becomes more relaxed (but still prominent as it is a main part of the theory) research expands.
Comparing EPQ and Big Five
Testing methodology, and factors
Both the EPQ and Big Five approaches extensively use self-report questionnaires. The factors are intended to be orthogonal (uncorrelated), though there are often small positive correlations between factors. The five factor model in particular has been criticized for losing the orthogonal structure between factors.Hans Eysenck has argued that fewer factors are superior to a larger number of partly related ones. Although these two approaches are comparable because of the use of factor analysis to construct hierarchical taxonomies, they differ in the organization and number of factors.
Similarities between lower-order factors for psychoticism and the facets of openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (from Matthews, Deary & Whiteman, 2003)
There are two higher-order factors that both taxonomies clearly share: extraversion and neuroticism. Both approaches broadly accept that extraversion is associated with sociability and positive affect, whereas neuroticism is associated with emotional instability and negative affect.
Many lower-order factors, or facets, are similar between the two taxonomies. For instance, both approaches contain factors for sociability/gregariousness, for activity levels, and for assertiveness within the higher order factor extraversion. However, there are differences too. First, the three-factor approach contains nine lower-order factors and the five-factor approach has six.
Eysenck's psychoticism factor incorporates some of the polar opposites of the lower order factors of openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness. A high scorer on tough-mindedness in psychoticism would score low on tender-mindedness in agreeableness. Most of the differences between the taxonomies stem from the three factor model's emphasis on fewer high-order factors.
Although both major trait models are descriptive, only the three-factor model offers a detailed causal explanation. Eysenck suggests that different personality traits are caused by the properties of the brain, which themselves are the result of genetic factors. In particular, the three-factor model identifies the reticular system and the limbic system in the brain as key components that mediate cortical arousal and emotional responses respectively. Eysenck advocates that extraverts have low levels of cortical arousal and introverts have high levels, leading extraverts to seek out more stimulation from socializing and being venturesome. Moreover, Eysenck surmised that there would be an optimal level of arousal, after which inhibition would occur and that this would be different for each person.
In a similar vein, the three-factor approach theorizes that neuroticism is mediated by levels of arousal in the limbic system and that individual differences arise because of variable activation thresholds between people. Therefore, highly neurotic people when presented with minor stressors, will exceed this threshold, whereas people low in neuroticism will not exceed normal activation levels, even when presented with large stressors. By contrast, proponents of the five-factor approach assume a role of genetics and environment but offer no explicit causal explanation.
Given this emphasis on biology in the three-factor approach, it would be expected that the third trait, psychoticism, would have a similar explanation. However, the causal properties of this state are not well defined. Eysenck has suggested that psychoticism is related to testosterone levels and is an inverse function of the serotonergic system, but he later revised this, linking it instead to the dopaminergic system.
Composed of two related but separable traits, Openness to Experience and Intellect. Behavioral aspects include having wide interests, and being imaginative and insightful, correlated with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Considered primarily a cognitive trait.
Gregarious, outgoing, sociable, projecting one's personality outward. The opposite of extraversion is introversion. Extraversion has shown to share certain genetic markers with substance abuse. Extraversion is associated with various regions of the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala.
Identifies people who are prone to psychological distress. Individuals who are high in neuroticism tend to be anxious, depressed, self-conscious, impulsive, vulnerable and display angry hostility. "Neuroticism is the major factor of personality pathology" (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1969). Neuroticism has been linked to serotonin transporter (5-HTT) binding sites in the thalamus: as well as activity in the insular cortex. Neuroticism also predicts the occurrence of more negative life experiences.
A "favorable or unfavorable attitude toward the self" (Rosenberg, 1965). An individual's sense of his or her value or worth, or the extent to which a person values, approves of, appreciates, prizes, or likes him or herself" (Blascovich & Tomaka, 1991).
A tendency towards shyness, being fearful and uncertain, tendency to worry. Neonatal complications such as preterm birth have been shown to affect harm avoidance. People affected by eating disorders exhibit high levels of harm avoidance. The volume of the left amygdala in girls was correlated to levels of HA, in separate studies HA was correlated with reduced grey matter volume in the orbitofrontal, occipital and parietal regions.
The defining trait of highly sensitive persons, characterized by the increased depth of processing of sensory input that underlies HSPs' greater proclivity to overstimulation, emotional reactivity and empathy, and sensitivity to stimuli.
Risk taking, lack of planning, and making up one's mind quickly (Eysenck and Eysenck). A component of disinhibition. Abnormal patterns of impulsivity have been linked to lesions in the right inferior frontal gyrus and in studies done by Antonio Damasio author of Descartes Error, damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex has been shown to cause a defect in real-life decision making in individuals with otherwise normal intellect. Those who sustain this type of damage are oblivious to the future consequences of their actions and live in the here and now.
Psychoticism is a personality pattern typified by aggressiveness and interpersonal hostility, one of four traits in Hans Eysenck's model of personality. High levels of this trait were believed by Eysenck to be linked to increased vulnerability to psychosis such as schizophrenia. He also believed that blood relatives of psychotics would show high levels of this trait, suggesting a genetic basis to the trait.
Persistent, often unwelcome, and frequently disturbing ideas, thoughts, images or emotions, rumination, often inducing an anxious state. Obsessionality may result as a dysfunction of the basal ganglia.
^McCrae, R. R.; Costa, P. C.; Jr (1987). "Validation of the five-factor model across instruments and observers". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52 (1): 81-90. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52. PMID3820081.
^ abCosta, P. T.; McCrae, R. R. (1992). "Four ways five factors are basic". Personality and Individual Differences. 13 (6): 653-665. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i.
^ abMarsella, Dubanoski, Hamada, & Morse, A, J., J, W, C. & H (2000). "The measurement of personality across cultures: Historical conceptual, and methodological issues and considerations". American Behavioral Scientist. 44 (1): 41-62. doi:10.1177/00027640021956080.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Draycott, S. G.; Kline, P. (1995). "The Big Three or the Big Five - the EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: a research note, replication and elaboration". Personality and Individual Differences. 18 (6): 801-804. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00010-4.
^Eysenck, H. J. (1992). "A reply to Costa and McCrae. P or A and C: The role of theory". Personality and Individual Differences. 13 (8): 867-868. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90003-8.
^Hans Eysenck and S. B. G. Eysenck. (1991). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton.
^Costa, P. T.; McCrae, R. R. (1990). "Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality". Journal of Personality Disorders. 4 (4): 362-371. doi:10.1521/pedi.19184.108.40.2062.
^Lynam, D. R.; Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T. E.; Raine, A.; Loeber, R.; Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2005). "Adolescent psychopathy and the Big Five: Results from two samples". Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 33 (4): 431-443. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-5724-0. PMID16118990.
^Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
^Eysenck, H.J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
^Eysenck, H. J. (1994). "Creativity and personality: Word association, origence, and Psychoticism". Creativity Research Journal. 7 (2): 209-216. doi:10.1080/10400419409534525.
^Eysenck, H. J. (1992). "The definition and measurement of psychoticism". Personality and Individual Differences. 13 (7): 757-785. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90050-y.
^Eysenck, H. J. (1997). "Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 73 (6): 1224-1237. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114.
^DeYoung, CG; Peterson, JB; Higgins, DM (Aug 2005). "Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality". Journal of Personality. 73 (4): 825-58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x. PMID15958136.
^Heaven, PC; Mulligan, K; Merrilees, R; Woods, T; Fairooz, Y (Sep 2001). "Neuroticism and conscientiousness as predictors of emotional, external, and restrained eating behaviors". International Journal of Eating Disorders. 30 (2): 161-6. doi:10.1002/eat.1068. PMID11449449.
^Casper, RC; Hedeker, D; McClough, JF (Sep 1992). "Personality dimensions in eating disorders and their relevance for subtyping". Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 31 (5): 830-40. doi:10.1097/00004583-199209000-00008. PMID1400113.
^Graziano, WG; Tobin, RM.; et al. (Jun 1993). "Genetic and environmental effects on openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness: an adoption/twin study". Journal of Personality. 61 (2): 159-79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb01030.x. PMID8345444.
^Graziano, WG; Tobin, RM (October 2002). "Agreeableness: dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?". Journal of Personality. 70 (5): 695-727. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05021. PMID12322857.
^Miller, JL; et al. (Jan 2006). "Neuroticism and introversion: a risky combination for disordered eating among a non-clinical sample of undergraduate women". Eating Behaviours. 7 (1): 69-78. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2005.07.003. PMID16360625.
^Favaro, A; Tenconi, E; Santonastaso, P (Apr 2008). "The relationship between obstetric complications and temperament in eating disorders: a mediation hypothesis". Psychosomatic Medicine. 70 (3): 372-7. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318164604e. PMID18256341.
^Iidaka, T.; et al. (2006). "Volume of left amygdala subregion predicted temperamental trait of harm avoidance in female young subjects. A voxel-based morphometry study". Brain Research. 1125 (1): 85-93. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.015. PMID17113049.
^Halmi, KA; et al. (Nov 2000). "Perfectionism in anorexia nervosa: variation by clinical subtype, obsessionality, and pathological eating behavior". American Journal of Psychiatry. 157 (11): 1799-805. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1799. PMID11058477.
^Ruggiero, GM.; et al. (Sep 2003). "Stress situation reveals an association between perfectionism and drive for thinness". International Journal of Eating Disorders. 34 (2): 220-6. doi:10.1002/eat.10191. PMID12898558.
^Hewitt, PL; et al. (2008). "The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview". Psychiatry. 71 (2): 93-122. doi:10.1521/psyc.2008.71.2.93. PMID18573033.
^Frewen, PA; Pain, C; Dozois, DJ; Lanius, RA (Jul 2006). "Alexithymia in PTSD: psychometric and FMRI studies". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1071: 397-400. doi:10.1196/annals.1364.029. PMID16891585.
^Guilbaud, O; Corcos, M; Chambry, J; Paterniti, S; Loas, G; Jeammet, P (2000). "[Alexithymia and depression in eating disorders]". Encephale. 26 (5): 1-6. PMID11192799.
^Smith, GJ; et al. (Aug 1997). "Alexithymia in patients with eating disorders: an investigation using a new projective technique". Perceptual and Motor Skills. 85 (1): 247-56. doi:10.2466/pms.1918.104.22.168. PMID9293583.
^Tchanturia, K; et al. (Sep 2001). "Perceptual illusions in eating disorders: rigid and fluctuating styles". Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 32 (3): 107-15. doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(01)00025-8. PMID11934124.
^Cserjési, R (Jun 2009). "Affect, cognition, awareness and behavior in eating disorders. Comparison between obesity and anorexia nervosa". Orvosi Hetilap. 150 (24): 1135-43. doi:10.1556/OH.2009.28590. PMID19482720.
^Bechara, A; Damasio, AR; Damasio, H; Anderson, SW (Apr-Jun 1994). "Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex". Cognition. 50 (1-3): 7-15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3. PMID8039375.
^Welch, SL; Fairburn, CG (Oct 1996). "Impulsivity or comorbidity in bulimia nervosa. A controlled study of deliberate self-harm and alcohol and drug misuse in a community sample". British Journal of Psychiatry. 169 (4): 451-8. doi:10.1192/bjp.169.4.451. PMID8894196.
^Spiegel, DR.; Qureshi, N. (2010). "The successful treatment of disinhibition due to a possible case of non-human immunodeficiency virus neurosyphilis: a proposed pathophysiological explanation of the symptoms and treatment". General Hospital Psychiatry. 32 (2): 221-224. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.01.002. PMID20303000.
^Aarsland, D; Litvan, I; Larsen, JP (2001). "Neuropsychiatric symptoms of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease". Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 13 (1): 42-9. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.1.42. PMID11207328.
^Eysenck, H.J, Eysenck, S.B.G (1977). Psychoticism as a Dimension of Personality. London: Hodder and Stoughton. ISBN978-0-340-20919-6.
^Zubieta, JK (1995). "Obsessionality in eating-disorder patients: relationship to clinical presentation and two-year outcome". Journal of Psychiatric Research. 29 (4): 333-42. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(95)00020-6. PMID8847659.
^Salkovskis, PM; Forrester, E; Richards, C (1998). "Cognitive-behavioural approach to understanding obsessional thinking". British Journal of Psychiatry Supplement. 173 (35): 53-63. doi:10.1192/S0007125000297900. PMID9829027.