Tiberian Vocalization
Get Tiberian Vocalization essential facts below. View Videos or join the Tiberian Vocalization discussion. Add Tiberian Vocalization to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Tiberian Vocalization
Closeup of Aleppo Codex, Joshua 1:1

The Tiberian vocalization, Tiberian pointing, or Tiberian niqqud (Hebrew: ? Nikkud Tveriyani) is a system of diacritics (niqqud) devised by the Masoretes of Tiberias to add to the consonantal text of the Hebrew Bible to produce the Masoretic Text.[1] The system soon became used to vocalize other Hebrew texts, as well.

The Tiberian vocalization marks vowels and stress, makes fine distinctions of consonant quality and length, and serves as punctuation. While the Tiberian system was devised for Tiberian Hebrew, it has become the dominant system for vocalizing all forms of Hebrew and has long since eclipsed the Babylonian and Palestinian vocalization systems.

Consonant diacritics

The sin dot distinguishes between the two values of ?. A dagesh indicates a consonant is geminate or unspirantized, and a raphe indicates spirantization. The mappiq indicates that ? is consonantal, not silent, in syllable-coda position.

Vowel diacritics

The seven vowel qualities of Tiberian Hebrew are indicated straightforwardly by distinct diacritics:

niqqud with ?
name patah segol tzere hiriq qamatz holam qubutz shuruq
value /a/ /?/ /e/ /i/ /?/ /o/ /u/

The diacritics qubutz and shuruq both represent /u/, but shuruq is used when the text uses full spelling (with waw as a mater lectionis). Each of the vowel phonemes could be allophonically lengthened; occasionally, the length is marked with metheg. (Then, metheg also can indirectly indicate when a following shva is vocal.)

The ultrashort vowels are slightly more complicated. There were two graphemes corresponding to the vowel /?/, attested by alternations in manuscripts like ~, ~.‎.[2] In addition, one of the graphemes could also be silent:

niqqud with ?
name shva hataf patah hataf segol hataf qamatz
value /?/, ? /?/ // //
Figurines holding Tiberian vowel diacritics. Limestone and basalt artwork at the shore in Tiberias.

Shva was used both to indicate lack of a vowel (quiescent ?wa, shva nah) and as another symbol to represent the phoneme /?/ (mobile ?wa, shva na), the latter also represented by hataf patah.[2][3] The phoneme /?/ had a number of allophones; /?/ had to be written with shva rather than hataf patah when it was not pronounced as [?].[4] Before a laryngeal-pharyngeal, mobile ?wa was pronounced as an ultrashort copy of the following vowel ( [uv?q?]) and as [?] preceding /j/, ( /ðamm?juni/).[2] Using ?ataf vowels was mandatory under gutturals but optional under other letters, and there was considerable variation among manuscripts.[5]

That is referenced specifically by medieval grammarians:

If one argues that the dalet of 'Mordecai' (and other letters in other words) has hatef qames, tell him, 'but this sign is only a device used by some scribes to warn that the consonants should be pronounced fully, and not slurred over'.

-- Abu al-Faraj Harun, Hid?yat al-Q?ri (Horayat Ha-Qore), quoted in Yeivin (1980:283-284)

The names of the vowel diacritics are iconic and show some variation:

The names of the vowels are mostly taken from the form and action of the mouth in producing the various sounds, as ? opening; a wide parting (of the mouth), also ?=?) breaking, parting (cf. the Arab, kasr); ? (also ) narrow opening; ? closing, according to others fullness, i.e. of the mouth (also fullness of the mouth). also denotes a slighter, as ? and ? (also ? ) a firmer, compression or contraction of the mouth. Segôl ( bunch of grapes) takes its name from its form. So ? (three points) is another name for Qibbú?. Moreover the names were mostly so formed (but only later), that the sound of each vowel is heard in the first syllable ( for ,‎ for ,‎ for ); in order to carry this out consistently some even write Sägôl, Qome?-?atûf, Qûbbû?.

Cantillation

Cantillation signs mark stress and punctuation. Metheg may mark secondary stress, and maqqaf conjoins words into one stress unit, which normally takes only one cantillation mark on the final word in the unit.

See also

References

  1. ^ The portions of the Hebrew Bible in Biblical Aramaic use the same system of vocalization.
  2. ^ a b c Blau (2010:105-106)
  3. ^ Blau (2010:117-118)
  4. ^ Blau (2010:118)
  5. ^ Yeivin (1980:283)

Sources

  • Joshua Blau (2010). Phonology and Morphology of Biblical Hebrew. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. ISBN 1-57506-129-5.
  • Sáenz-Badillos, Angel (1993). A History of the Hebrew Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-55634-1.
  • Yeivin, Israel (1980). Introduction to the Tiberian Masorah. Scholars Press. ISBN 0-89130-373-1.

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Tiberian_vocalization
 



 



 
Music Scenes