Get Talk:Radziwi%C5%82%C5%82 Chronicle essential facts below. View Videos or join the Talk:Radziwi%C5%82%C5%82 Chronicle discussion. Add Talk:Radziwi%C5%82%C5%82 Chronicle to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Radziwill Chronicle = Nestor Chronicle (Rauchspur der Raben), german: Gottfried Sturm u.a. (Hrsg.):Rauchspur der Tauben (Radziwill-Chronik).Leipzig, Weimar: Gustav Kiepenheuer Verlag, 1986
"Radzivill Chronicle - according to Unesco". Sounds like a fine name to me. Do we need a national name for this internationally important document? --Irpen 05:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikiepdia also uses Radziwi family. Why spell a Polish name wrongly? Just to prove we're not Polish? --Doric Loon (talk) 06:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Radziwi is not a Polish name, it's a Lithuanian family. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is doesn't make all people that lived there ethnically Polish or ethnically English. -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
What does UNESCO have to do with this? No source or citation is given. If the MS is under UNESCO protection, that should be stated, with full details. Otherwise, UNESCO is hardly an authority here, and should be dropped. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Great miniatures - well done whoever got them for us. But, could we please have them properly cited? Manuscript miniatures should be cited with the folio number, for example 123r or 321v. (r for recto, v for verso). And one of the three miniatures does not yet have a caption saying what it shows - somebody lying dying I think... please complete this. Potentially this article could be very nice. --Doric Loon (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)