Let X and Y be normed linear spaces, and denote by B(X,Y) the space of bounded operators of the form . Let be any subset. We say that T is bounded below on whenever there is a constant such that for all , the inequality holds. If A=X, we say simply that T is bounded below.
Now suppose X and Y are Banach spaces, and let and denote the respective identity operators. An operator is called inessential whenever is a Fredholm operator for every . Equivalently, T is inessential if and only if is Fredholm for every . Denote by the set of all inessential operators in .
An operator is called strictly singular whenever it fails to be bounded below on any infinite-dimensional subspace of X. Denote by the set of all strictly singular operators in . We say that is finitely strictly singular whenever for each there exists such that for every subspace E of X satisfying , there is such that . Denote by the set of all finitely strictly singular operators in .
Let denote the closed unit ball in X. An operator is compact whenever is a relatively norm-compact subset of Y, and denote by the set of all such compact operators.
Strictly singular operators can be viewed as a generalization of compact operators, as every compact operator is strictly singular. These two classes share some important properties. For example, if X is a Banach space and T is a strictly singular operator in B(X) then its spectrum satisfies the following properties: (i) the cardinality of is at most countable; (ii) (except possibly in the trivial case where X is finite-dimensional); (iii) zero is the only possible limit point of ; and (iv) every nonzero is an eigenvalue. This same "spectral theorem" consisting of (i)-(iv) is satisfied for inessential operators in B(X).
Classes , , , and all form norm-closed operator ideals. This means, whenever X and Y are Banach spaces, the component spaces , , , and are each closed subspaces (in the operator norm) of B(X,Y), such that the classes are invariant under composition with arbitrary bounded linear operators.
In general, we have , and each of the inclusions may or may not be strict, depending on the choices of X and Y.
Every bounded linear map , for , , is strictly singular. Here, and are sequence spaces. Similarly, every bounded linear map and , for , is strictly singular. Here is the Banach space of sequences converging to zero. This is a corollary of Pitt's theorem, which states that such T, for q < p, are compact.
If then the formal identity operator is finitely strictly singular but not compact. If then there exist "Pelczynski operators" in which are uniformly bounded below on copies of , , and hence are strictly singular but not finitely strictly singular. In this case we have . However, every inessential operator with codomain is strictly singular, so that . On the other hand, if X is any separable Banach space then there exists a bounded below operator any of which is inessential but not strictly singular. Thus, in particular, for all .
The compact operators form a symmetric ideal, which means if and only if . However, this is not the case for classes , , or . To establish duality relations, we will introduce additional classes.
If Z is a closed subspace of a Banach space Y then there exists a "canonical" surjection defined via the natural mapping . An operator is called strictly cosingular whenever given an infinite-dimensional closed subspace Z of Y, the map fails to be surjective. Denote by the subspace of strictly cosingular operators in B(X,Y).
Theorem 1. Let X and Y be Banach spaces, and let . If T* is strictly singular (resp. strictly cosingular) then T is strictly cosingular (resp. strictly singular).
Note that there are examples of strictly singular operators whose adjoints are neither strictly singular nor strictly cosingular (see Plichko, 2004). Similarly, there are strictly cosingular operators whose adjoints are not strictly singular, e.g. the inclusion map . So is not in full duality with .
Theorem 2. Let X and Y be Banach spaces, and let . If T* is inessential then so is T.
Plichko, Anatolij, "Superstrictly Singular and Superstrictly Cosingular Operators," North-Holland Mathematics Studies 197 (2004), pp239-255.