Standardized Coefficient

Get Standardized Coefficient essential facts below. View Videos or join the Standardized Coefficient discussion. Add Standardized Coefficient to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.

## Usage

## Implementation

## Advantages and disadvantages

## Terminology

## See also

## References

## Further reading

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Standardized Coefficient

This article has multiple issues. Please help or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In statistics, **standardized (regression) coefficients**, also called **beta coefficients** or **beta weights**, are the estimates resulting from a regression analysis where the underlying data have been standardized so that the variances of dependent and independent variables are equal to 1.^{[1]} Therefore, standardized coefficients are unitless and refer to how many standard deviations a dependent variable will change, per standard deviation increase in the predictor variable.

Standardization of the coefficient is usually done to answer the question of which of the independent variables have a greater effect on the dependent variable in a multiple regression analysis, when the variables are measured in different units of measurement (for example, income measured in dollars and family size measured in number of individuals). It may also be considered a general measure of effect size, quantifying the "magnitude" of the effect of one variable on another. For simple linear regression with orthogonal predictors, the standardized regression coefficient equals the correlation between the independent and dependent variables.

A regression carried out on original (unstandardized) variables produces unstandardized coefficients. A regression carried out on standardized variables produces standardized coefficients. Values for standardized and unstandardized coefficients can also be re-scaled to one another subsequent to either type of analysis.
Suppose that is the regression coefficient resulting from a linear regression (predicting by ). The standardized coefficient the simply results as , where and are the (estimated) standard deviations of and , respectively.^{[1]}

Sometimes, standardization is done only with respect to the standard deviation of the regressor (the independent variable ).^{[2]}^{[3]}

Standardized coefficients' advocates note that the coefficients are independent of the involved variables' units of measurement (i.e., standardized coefficients are *unitless*), which makes comparisons easy.^{[3]}

Critics voice concerns that such a standardization can be very misleading.^{[2]}^{[4]}
Due to the re-scaling based on sample standard deviations, any effect apparent in the standardized coefficient may be due to confounding with the particularities (especially: variability) of the involved data sample(s).
Also, the interpretation or meaning of a "*one standard deviation change*" in the regressor may vary markedly between non-normal distributions (e.g., when skewed, asymmetric or multimodal).

Some statistical software packages like PSPP, SPSS and SYSTAT label the standardized regression coefficients as "Beta" while the unstandardized coefficients are labeled "B". Others, like DAP/SAS label them "Standardized Coefficient". Sometimes the unstandardized variables are also labeled as "b".

- ^
^{a}^{b}Menard, S. (2004), "Standardized regression coefficients", in Lewis-Beck, M.S.; Bryman, A.; Liao, T.F. (eds.),*The Sage Encyclopedia of Sociel Science Research Methods*, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, pp. 1069-1070, doi:10.4135/9781412950589.n959 - ^
^{a}^{b}Greenland, S.; Schlesselman, J. J.; Criqui, M. H. (1986). "The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect".*American Journal of Epidemiology*.**123**(2): 203-208. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229. - ^
^{a}^{b}Newman, T. B.; Browner, W. S. (1991). "In defense of standardized regression coefficients".*Epidemiology*.**2**(5): 383-386. doi:10.1097/00001648-199109000-00014. **^**Greenland, S.; Maclure, M.; Schlesselman, J. J.; Poole, C.; Morgenstern, H. (1991). "Standardized regression coefficients: A further critique and review of some alternatives".*Epidemiology*.**2**(5): 387-392. doi:10.1097/00001648-199109000-00016.

- Schroeder, Larry D.; Sjoquist, David L.; Stephan, Paula E. (1986).
*Understanding Regression Analysis*. Sage Publications. pp. 31-32. ISBN 0-8039-2758-4. - Vittinghoff, Eric; Glidden, David V.; Shiboski, Stephen C.; McCulloch, Charles E. (2005).
*Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models*. Springer. pp. 75-76. ISBN 0-387-20275-7. - Neter, J.; Kutner, M. H.; Nachtsheim, C.J.; Wasserman, W. (1996). "7.5 Standardized multiple regression model".
*Applied Linear Statistical Models*(4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 281-284. ISBN 0-256-11736-5.

- Which Predictors Are More Important? - why standardized coefficients are used

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists