This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

This article summarizes the phonology (the sound system, or in more general terms, the pronunciation) of Standard Chinese (Standard Mandarin).

Standard Chinese is based on the Beijing dialect of Mandarin. Actual production varies widely among speakers, as they introduce elements of their native varieties (although television and radio announcers are chosen for their ability to produce the standard variety). Elements of the sound system include not only the segments - the vowels and consonants - of the language but also the tones that are applied to each syllable. Standard Chinese has four main tones, in addition to a neutral tone used on weak syllables.

This article represents phonetic values using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), noting correspondences chiefly with the Pinyin system for transcription of Chinese text. For correspondences with other systems, see the relevant articles, such as Wade-Giles, Bopomofo (Zhuyin), Gwoyeu Romatzyh, etc., and Romanization of Chinese.

Consonants

The following table shows the consonant sounds of Standard Chinese, transcribed using the International Phonetic Alphabet. The sounds shown in parentheses are sometimes not analyzed as separate phonemes; for more on these, see § Alveolo-palatal series below. Excluding these, and excluding the glides , , and (for which see § Glides below), there are 19 consonant phonemes in the inventory.

Between pairs of stops or affricates, having the same place and manner of articulation, the primary distinction is not voiced vs. voiceless (as in French or Russian), but unaspirated vs. aspirated (as in Scottish Gaelic or Icelandic). The unaspirated stops and affricates may however become voiced in weak syllables (see § Syllable reduction below). Such pairs are represented in the pinyin system mostly using letters which in Romance languages generally denote voiceless/voiced pairs (for example [p] and [b]), or in Germanic languages often denotes fortis/lenis pairs (for example initial aspirated voiceless/unaspirated voiced pairs such as [p?] and [b]). However, in pinyin they denote aspirated/unaspirated pairs, for example /p?/ and /p/ are represented with p and b respectively.

More details about the individual consonant sounds are given in the following table.

All of the consonants may occur as the initial sound of a syllable, with the exception of /?/ (unless the zero initial is assigned to this phoneme; see below). Excepting the rhotic coda, the only consonants that can appear in syllable coda (final) position are /n/ and /?/ (although [m] may occur as an allophone of /n/ before labial consonants in fast speech). Final /n/, /?/ may be pronounced without complete oral closure, resulting in a syllable that in fact ends with a long nasalized vowel.^[1]:72 See also § Syllable reduction, below.

Denti-alveolar and retroflex series

The consonants listed in the first table above as denti-alveolar are sometimes described as alveolars, and sometimes as dentals. The affricates and the fricative are particularly often described as dentals; these are generally pronounced with the tongue on the lower teeth.^[1]:27

The retroflex consonants (like those of Polish) are actually apical rather than subapical, and so are considered by some authors not to be truly retroflex; they may be more accurately called post-alveolar.^[3][4] Some speakers not from Beijing may lack the retroflexes in their native dialects, and may thus replace them with dentals.^[1]:26

Alveolo-palatal series

The alveolo-palatal consonants (pinyin j, q, x) are standardly pronounced [t, t, ?]. Some speakers realize them as palatalized dentals [t?s?], [t?s], [s?]; this is claimed to be especially common among children and women,^[1]:33 although officially it is regarded as substandard and as a feature specific to the Beijing dialect.^[5]

In phonological analysis, it is often assumed that, when not followed by one of the high front vowels [i] or [y], the alveolo-palatals consist of a consonant followed by a palatal glide ([j] or [?]). That is, syllables represented in pinyin as beginning ⟨ji-⟩, ⟨qi-⟩, ⟨xi-⟩, ⟨ju-⟩, ⟨qu-⟩, ⟨xu-⟩ (followed by a vowel) are taken to begin [tj], [tj], [?j], [t], [t?], []. The actual pronunciations are more like [t], [t], [?], [t], [t?], [] (or for speakers using the dental variants, [t?s?], [t?s], [s?], [t?s?], [t?s], [s?]). This is consistent with the general observation (see under § Glides) that medial glides are realized as palatalization and/or labialization of the preceding consonant (palatalization already being inherent in the case of the palatals).

On the above analysis, the alveolo-palatals are in complementary distribution with the dentals [t?s, t?s?, s], with the velars [k, k?, x], and with the retroflexes [, ?, ?], as none of these can occur before high front vowels or palatal glides, whereas the alveolo-palatals occur only before high front vowels or palatal glides. Therefore, linguists often prefer to classify [t, t, ?] not as independent phonemes, but as allophones of one of the other three series.^[6] The existence of the above-mentioned dental variants inclines some to prefer to identify the alveolo-palatals with the dentals, but identification with any of the three series is possible (unless the empty rime^{[further explanation needed]} is identified with /i/, in which case the velars become the only candidate; see below). The Yale and Wade-Giles systems mostly treat the alveolo-palatals as allophones of the retroflexes; Tongyong Pinyin mostly treats them as allophones of the dentals; and Mainland Chinese Braille treats them as allophones of the velars. In standard pinyin and bopomofo, however, they are represented as a separate sequence.

The alveolo-palatals arose historically from a merger of the dentals [t?s, t?s?, s] and velars [k, k?, x] before high front vowels and glides. Previously, some instances of modern [t(?)i] were instead [k(?)i], and others were [t?s(?)i]. The change took place in the last two or three centuries at different times in different areas. This explains why some European transcriptions of Chinese names (especially in postal romanization) contain ⟨ki-⟩, ⟨hi-⟩, ⟨tsi-⟩, ⟨si-⟩ where an alveolo-palatal might be expected in modern Chinese. Examples are Peking for Beijing, Chungking for Chongqing, Fukien for Fujian (c.f. Hokkien), Tientsin for Tianjin; Sinkiang for Xinjiang, and Sian for Xi'an. The complementary distribution with the retroflex series arose when syllables that had a retroflex consonant followed by a medial glide lost the medial glide.

Zero onset

A full syllable such as ai, in which the vowel is not preceded by any of the standard initial consonants or glides, is said to have a null initial or zero onset. This may be realized as a consonant sound: and are possibilities, as are [?] and in some non-standard varieties. It has been suggested^[who?] that such an onset be regarded as a special phoneme, or as an instance of the phoneme /?/, although it can also be treated as no phoneme (absence of onset). By contrast, in the case of the particle ? a, which is a weak onsetless syllable, linking occurs with the previous syllable (as described under § Syllable reduction, below).^[1]:43

When a stressed vowel-initial Chinese syllable follows a consonant-final syllable, the consonant does not directly link with the vowel. Instead, the zero onset seems to intervene in between. ; mián'?o ("cotton jacket") becomes [mj?n?au], [mj?n?au]. However, in connected speech none of these output forms is natural. Instead, when the words are spoken together the most natural pronunciation is rather similar to [mj:au], in which there is no nasal closure or any version of the zero onset, and instead nasalization of the vowel occurs.

Glides

The glides , , and sound respectively like the y in English yes, the (h)u in French huit, and the w in English we. (Beijing speakers often replace initial [w] with a labiodental [?], except when it is followed by [o].^[1]:25) The glides are commonly analyzed not as independent phonemes, but as consonantal allophones of the high vowels: [i?, y?, u?]. This is possible because there is no ambiguity in interpreting a sequence like yao/-iao as /iau/, and potentially problematic sequences such as */iu/ do not occur.

The glides may occur in initial position in a syllable. This occurs with [?] in the syllables written yu, yuan, yue, and yun in pinyin; with [j] in other syllables written with initial y in pinyin (ya, yi, etc.); and with [w] in syllables written with initial w in pinyin (wa, wu, etc.). When a glide is followed by the vowel of which that glide is considered an allophone, the glide may be regarded as epenthetic (automatically inserted), and not as a separate realization of the phoneme. Hence the syllable yi, pronounced [ji], may be analyzed as consisting of the single phoneme /i/, and similarly yin may be analyzed as /in/, yu as /y/, and wu as /u/.^[1]:274ff It is also possible to hear both from the same speaker, even in the same conversation.^[1]:274ff For example, one may hear the number "one" ?; y? as either [jí] or [í].

The glides can also occur in medial position, that is, after the initial consonant but before the main vowel. Here they are represented in pinyin as vowels: for example, the i in bie represents [j], and the u in duan represents [w]. There are some restrictions on the possible consonant-glide combinations: [w] does not occur after labials (except for some speakers in bo, po, mo, fo); [j] does not occur after retroflexes and velars (or after [f]); and [?] occurs medially only in lüe and nüe and after alveolo-palatals (for which see above). A consonant-glide combination at the start of a syllable is articulated as a single sound - the glide is not in fact pronounced after the consonant, but is realized as palatalization [?], labialization [?], or both [?], of the consonant.^[1]:28 (The same modifications of initial consonants occur in syllables where they are followed by a high vowel, although normally no glide is considered to be present there. Hence a consonant is generally palatalized [?] when followed by /i/, labialized [?] when followed by /u/, and both [?] when followed by /y/.)

The glides [j] and [w] are also found as the final element in some syllables. These are commonly analyzed as diphthongs rather than vowel-glide sequences. For example, the syllable bai is assigned the underlying representation /pai?/. (In pinyin, the second element is generally written ⟨-i⟩ or ⟨-u⟩, but /au?/ is written as ⟨-ao⟩.)

Syllabic consonants

The syllables written in pinyin as zi, ci, si, zhi, chi, shi, ri may be described as having a syllabic consonant instead of a vowel:

• [ ~ z?], a laminal denti-alveolar voiced continuant,^[a] in zi, ci, si ([ts ts s]);
• [ ~ ], an apical retroflex voiced continuant,^[a] in zhi, chi, shi, ri ([?   ]).

Alternatively, the nucleus may be described not as a syllabic consonant, but as a vowel:

• , similar to Russian ?, in zi, ci, si, zhi, chi, shi, ri ([ts? ts s?  ?  ]).

Phonologically, these syllables may be analyzed as having their own vowel phoneme, /?/. However, it is possible to merge this with the phoneme /i/ (to which it is historically related), since the two are in complementary distribution - provided that the § Alveolo-palatal series is either left unmerged, or is merged with the velars rather than the retroflex or alveolar series. (That is, [ti], [t?s?], and [?] all exist, but *[ki] and *[k?] do not exist, so there is no problem merging both [i]~[?] and [k]~[t] at the same time.)

Another approach is to regard the syllables assigned above to /?/ as having an (underlying) empty nuclear slot ("empty rime", Chinese ; k?ngyùn), i.e. as not containing a vowel phoneme at all. This is more consistent with the syllabic consonant description of these syllables. When this is the case, sometimes the phoneme is described as shifting from voiceless to voiced, e.g. s? becoming /s?̩/.

Syllabic consonants may also arise as a result of weak syllable reduction; see below. Syllabic nasal consonants are also heard in certain interjections; pronunciations of such words include [m], [n], [?], [hm], [h?].

Vowels

Monophthongs of Mandarin Chinese as they are pronounced in Beijing (from Lee & Zee (2003:110)).

Part 1 of Mandarin Chinese diphthongs as they are pronounced in Beijing (from Lee & Zee (2003:110)).

Part 2 of Mandarin Chinese diphthongs as they are pronounced in Beijing (from Lee & Zee (2003:110)).

Standard Chinese can be analyzed as having five vowel phonemes: /i, u, y, ?, a/.^[] (For discussion of possible analyses, including some with fewer vowels, see below.) /i, u, y/ are high (close) vowels, /?/ is mid whereas /a/ is low (open).

The precise realization of each vowel depends on its phonetic environment. In particular, the vowel /?/ has two broad allophones and (corresponding respectively to pinyin e and o in most cases). These sounds can be treated as a single underlying phoneme because they are in complementary distribution. (Apparent counterexamples are provided by certain interjections, such as [?], [?], [j?], and [l?], but these are normally treated as special cases operating outside the normal phonemic system.^[b])

Allophones

Transcriptions of the vowels' allophones (the ways they are pronounced in particular phonetic environments) differ somewhat between sources. The following table provides one fairly typical set of descriptions (not including the values that occur with the rhotic coda).^[c]

¹ü is written as u after j, q, or x (the ⟨-u⟩ phoneme never occurs in these positions)

²uo is written as o after b, p, m, or f.

More details about the individual vowel allophones are given in the following table.

As a general rule, vowels in open syllables (those which have no coda following the main vowel) are pronounced long, while others are pronounced short. This does not apply to weak syllables, in which all vowels are short.^[1]:42

Effect of coda on central vowels

In Standard Chinese, the vowels [a] and [?] harmonize in backness with the resulting coda.^[8][1]:72-73 For [a], it is fronted [a?] before /i, n/ and backed [a?] before /u, ?/. For [?], it is fronted [] before /n/ and backed [] before /?/.

Effect of tone on mid vowel

Some native Mandarin speakers may pronounce [wei?], [jou?], and [w?n] as [ui], [iu], and [un] respectively in the first or second tone.^[9]:69

Alternative analyses

Some linguists prefer to reduce the number of vowel phonemes still further (at the expense of including underlying glides in their systems). Edwin G. Pulleyblank has proposed a system which includes underlying glides, but no vowels at all.^[1]:37 More common are systems with two vowels; for example, in Mantaro Hashimoto's system,^[10] there are just two vowel nuclei, /?, a/, which may be preceded by a glide /j, w, ?/, and may be followed by a coda /i, u, n, ?/ (additional sequences are afforded by the rhotic coda //; see Erhua). The various combinations of glide, vowel, and coda have different surface manifestations, as shown in the table below. Any of the three positions may be empty, i.e. occupied by a null meta-phoneme ?; for example, the high vowels [i, u, y] are analyzed as glide + ?, and the empty rime, i.e. the syllabic consonant [~] or the vowel [?], is analyzed as having all three values null, e.g. si [s] is analyzed as an underlying syllabic /s?/.

¹ü is written as u after j, q, or x.

²uo is written as o after b, p, m, or f.

This system of phonemes is used in the bopomofo phonetic transcription system commonly used in Taiwan.

Rhotic coda

Standard Chinese features syllables that end with a rhotic coda /?/. This feature, known in Chinese as erhua, is particularly characteristic of the Beijing dialect; many other dialects do not use it as much, and some not at all.^[1]:195 It occurs in two cases:

1. In a small number of independent words or morphemes pronounced [?] or [a], written in pinyin as er (with some tone), such as ? èr "two", ? ?r "ear", and ? (traditional ?) ér "son".
2. In syllables in which the rhotic coda is added as a suffix to another morpheme. This suffix is represented by the character ? [?] ("son"), to which meaning it is historically related, and in pinyin as r. The suffix combines with the final sound of the syllable, and regular but complex sound changes occur as a result (described in detail under erhua).

The r final is pronounced with a relatively lax tongue, and has been described as a "retroflex vowel".^[1]:41

In dialects that do not make use of the rhotic coda, it may be omitted in pronunciation, or in some cases a different word may be selected: for example, Beijing zhèr "here" and nàr "there" may be replaced by the synonyms zhèli and nàli.

Syllables

Syllables in Standard Chinese have the maximal form CGVX^T,^[9]:48 traditionally analysed as an "initial" consonant C, a "final", and a tone T.^[11] The final consists of a "medial" G, which may be one of the glides [j, w, ?], a vowel V, and a coda X, which may be one of [n, ?, , i?, u?]. The vowel and coda may also be grouped as the "rhyme",^[9]:16 sometimes spelled "rime". Any of C, G, and X (and V, in some analyses) may be absent.

Many of the possible combinations under the above scheme do not actually occur. There are only some 35 final combinations (medial+rime) in actual syllables (see pinyin finals). In all, there are only about 400 different syllables when tone is ignored, and about 1300 when tone is included. This is a far smaller number of distinct syllables than in a language such as English. Since Chinese syllables usually constitute whole words, or at least morphemes, the smallness of the syllable inventory results in large numbers of homophones. However, in Standard Chinese, the average word length is actually almost exactly two syllables, practically eliminating most homophony issues even when tone is disregarded, especially when context is taken into account as well.^[12][13] (Still, due to the limited phonetic inventory, homophonic puns in Mandarin Chinese are very common and important in Chinese culture.^[14][15])

For a list of all Standard Chinese syllables (excluding tone and rhotic coda) see the pinyin table or zhuyin table.

Full and weak syllables

Syllables can be classified as full (or strong), and weak. Weak syllables are usually grammatical markers such as ? le, or the second syllables of some compound words (although many other compounds consist of two or more full syllables).

A full syllable carries one of the four main tones, and some degree of stress. Weak syllables are unstressed, and have neutral tone. The contrast between full and weak syllables is distinctive; there are many minimal pairs such as yàoshì "important matter" and yàoshi "key", or dàyì "main idea" and (with the same characters) dàyi "careless", the second word in each case having a weak second syllable. Some linguists consider this contrast to be primarily one of stress, while others regard it as one of tone. For further discussion, see under Neutral tone and Stress, below.

There is also a difference in syllable length. Full syllables can be analyzed as having two morae ("heavy"), the vowel being lengthened if there is no coda. Weak syllables, however, have a single mora ("light"), and are pronounced approximately 50% shorter than full syllables.^[1]:88 Any weak syllable will usually be an instance of the same morpheme (and written with the same character) as some corresponding strong syllable; the weak form will often have a modified pronunciation, however, as detailed in the following section.

Syllable reduction

Apart from differences in tone, length, and stress, weak syllables are subject to certain other pronunciation changes (reduction).^[16]

• If a weak syllable begins with an unaspirated obstruent, such as (pinyin) b, d, g, z, j, that consonant may become voiced. For example, in zu?ba ("mouth"), the second syllable is likely to begin with a [b] sound, rather than an unaspirated [p].
• The vowel of a weak syllable is often reduced, becoming more central. For example, in the word zu?ba just mentioned, the final vowel may become a schwa [?].
• The coda (final consonant or offglide) of a weak syllable is often dropped (this is linked to the shorter, single-mora nature of weak syllables, as referred to above). If the dropped coda was a nasal consonant, the vowel may be nasalized.^[1]:88 For example, n?odai ("head") may end with a monophthong [?] rather than a diphthong, and ch?ntian ("spring") may end with a centralized and nasalized vowel [].
• In some cases, the vowel may be dropped altogether. This may occur, particularly with high vowels, when the unstressed syllable begins with a fricative or an aspirated consonant; for example, dòufu ("tofu") may be said as dòu-f, and wènti ("question") as wèn-t (the remaining initial consonant is pronounced as a syllabic consonant). The same may even occur in full syllables that have low ("half-third") tone.^[1]:258 The vowel (and coda) may also be dropped after a nasal, in such words as w?men ("we") and shénme ("what"), which may be said as w?m and shém - these are examples of the merger of two syllables into one, which occurs in a variety of situations in connected speech.

The example of shénme -> shém also involves assimilation, which is heard even in unreduced syllables in quick speech (for example, in gu?mb? for gu?ngb? "broadcast"). A particular case of assimilation is that of the sentence-final exclamatory particle ? a, a weak syllable, which has different characters for its assimilated forms:

Tones

Relative pitch changes of the four tones in running speech, most common realization

Relative pitch changes of the four full tones in isolation

Standard Chinese, like all varieties of Chinese, is tonal. This means that in addition to consonants and vowels, the pitch contour of a syllable is used to distinguish words from each other. Many non-native Chinese speakers have difficulties mastering the tones of each character, but correct tonal pronunciation is essential for intelligibility because of the vast number of words in the language that only differ by tone (i.e. are minimal pairs with respect to tone). Statistically, tones are as important as vowels in Standard Chinese.^{[note 1][17]}

Tonal categories

The following table shows the four main tones of Standard Chinese, together with the neutral (or fifth) tone.

The four main tones of Standard Mandarin, pronounced with the syllable ma.

The Chinese names of the main four tones are respectively [] y?n píng ("dark level"), [] yáng píng ("light level"), ? sh?ng^[19][20] or shàng^[21] ("rising"), and ? qù ("departing"). As descriptions, they apply rather to the predecessor Middle Chinese tones than to the modern tones; see below. The modern Standard Chinese tones are produced as follows:

1. First tone, or high-level tone, is a steady high sound, produced as if it were being sung instead of spoken. (In a few syllables the quality of the vowel is changed when it carries first tone; see the vowel table, above.)
2. Second tone, or rising tone, or more specifically high-rising, is a sound that rises from middle to high pitch (like in the English "What?!"). In a three-syllable expression, if the first syllable has first or second tone and the final syllable is not weak, then a second tone on the middle syllable may change to first tone.^[22]
3. Third tone, low or dipping tone, descends from mid-low to low; between other tones it may simply be low. This tone is often demonstrated as having a rise in pitch after the low fall, however third tone syllables that include the rise are significantly longer than other syllables; when a third-tone syllable is not said in isolation, this rise is normally heard only if it appears at the end of a sentence or before a pause, and then usually only on stressed monosyllables.^[1]:222 The third tone without the rise is sometimes called half third tone. Also, two consecutive third tones are avoided by changing the first to second tone; see § Third tone sandhi, below. Unlike the other tones, third tone is pronounced with breathiness or murmur.^[1]:213
4. Fourth tone, falling tone, or high-falling, features a sharp fall from high to low (as is heard in curt commands in English, such as "Stop!"). When followed by another fourth-tone syllable, the fall may be only from high to mid-level.^[23]
5. For the neutral tone or fifth tone, see the following section.

Most romanization systems, including pinyin, represent the tones as diacritics on the vowels (as does zhuyin), although some, like Wade-Giles, use superscript numbers at the end of each syllable. The tone marks and numbers are rarely used outside of language textbooks: in particular, they are usually absent in public signs, company logos, and so forth. Gwoyeu Romatzyh is a rare example of a system where tones are represented using normal letters of the alphabet (although without a one-to-one correspondence).

Neutral tone

Also called fifth tone or zeroth tone (in Chinese ; ; q?ngsh?ng, literal meaning: "light tone"), the neutral tone is sometimes thought of as a lack of tone. It is associated with weak syllables, which are generally somewhat shorter than tonic syllables. The pitch of a syllable with neutral tone is determined by the tone of the preceding syllable. The following table shows the pitch at which the neutral tone is pronounced in Standard Chinese after each of the four main tones.^[24] The situation differs by dialect, and in some regions, notably Taiwan, the neutral tone is relatively uncommon.

Although the contrast between weak and full syllables is often distinctive, the neutral tone is often not described as a full-fledged tone; some linguists feel that it results from a "spreading out" of the tone on the preceding syllable. This idea is appealing because without it, the neutral tone needs relatively complex tone sandhi rules to be made sense of; indeed, it would have to have four allotones, one for each of the four tones that could precede it. However, the "spreading" theory incompletely characterizes the neutral tone, especially in sequences where more than one neutral-tone syllable is found adjacent.^[25] In Modern Standard Mandarin as applied in A Dictionary of Current Chinese, the second syllable of words with a 'toneless final syllable variant' (?·?) can be read with either a neutral tone or with the normal tone.^[26][27][28]

Relationship between Middle Chinese and modern tones

The four tones of Middle Chinese are not in one-to-one correspondence with the modern tones. The following table shows the development of the traditional tones as reflected in modern Standard Chinese. The development of each tone depends on the initial consonant of the syllable: whether it was a voiceless consonant (denoted in the table by v-), a voiced obstruent (v+), or a sonorant (s). (The voiced–voiceless distinction has been lost in modern Standard Chinese.)

Tone sandhi

Pronunciation also varies with context according to the rules of tone sandhi. Some such changes have been noted above in the descriptions of the individual tones; however, the most prominent phenomena of this kind relate to consecutive sequences of third-tone syllables. There are also a few common words that have variable tone.

Third tone sandhi

The principal rule of third tone sandhi is:

• When there are two consecutive third-tone syllables, the first of them is pronounced with second tone.

For example, l?osh? ("mouse") comes to be pronounced láosh? [lau?u]. It has been investigated whether the rising contour () on the prior syllable is in fact identical to a normal second tone; it has been concluded that it is, at least in terms of auditory perception.^[1]:237

When there are three or more third tones in a row, the situation becomes more complicated, since a third tone that precedes a second tone resulting from third tone sandhi may or may not be subject to sandhi itself. The results may depend on word boundaries, stress, and dialectal variations. General rules for three-syllable third-tone combinations can be formulated as follows:

1. If the first word is two syllables and the second word is one syllable, then the first two syllables become second tones. For example, b?ogu?n h?o ("to take good care of") takes the pronunciation báoguán h?o [paukwanxau?].
2. If the first word is one syllable, and the second word is two syllables, the second syllable becomes second tone, but the first syllable remains third tone. For example: l?o b?ogu?n ("to take care of all the time") takes the pronunciation l?o báogu?n [laupaukwan].

Some linguists have put forward more comprehensive systems of sandhi rules for multiple third tone sequences. For example, it is proposed^[1]:248 that modifications are applied cyclically, initially within rhythmic feet (trochees; see below), and that sandhi "need not apply between two cyclic branches".

Tones on special syllables

Special rules apply to the tones heard on the words (or morphemes) ? bù ("not") and ? y? ("one").

For ? bù:

1. ? is pronounced with second tone when followed by a fourth tone syllable.

   Example: (bù+shì, "to not be") becomes búshì [pu?]

2. In other cases, ? is pronounced with fourth tone. However, when used between words in an A-not-A question, it may become neutral in tone (e.g. shìbushì).

For ? y?:

1. ? is pronounced with second tone when followed by a fourth tone syllable.

   Example: (y?+dìng, "must") becomes yídìng [iti]

2. Before a first, second or third tone syllable, ? is pronounced with fourth tone.

   Examples: (y?+ti?n, "one day") becomes yìti?n [it?j?n?], (y?+nián, "one year") becomes yìnián [inj?n], (y?+q?, "together") becomes yìq? [iti].

3. When final, or when it comes at the end of a multi-syllable word (regardless of the first tone of the next word), ? is pronounced with first tone. It also has first tone when used as an ordinal number (or part of one), and when it is immediately followed by any digit (including another ?; hence both syllables of the word y?y? and its compounds have first tone).
4. When ? is used between two reduplicated words, it may become neutral in tone (e.g. kànyikàn ("to take a look of")).

The numbers ? q? ("seven") and ? b? ("eight") sometimes display similar tonal behavior as ? y?, but for most modern speakers they are always pronounced with first tone. (All of these numbers, and ? bù, were historically Ru tones, and as noted above, that tone does not have predictable reflexes in modern Chinese; this may account for the variation in tone on these words.)^[1]:228

Stress, rhythm and intonation

Stress within words (word stress) is not felt strongly by Chinese speakers, although contrastive stress is perceived easily (and functions much the same as in other languages). One of the reasons for the weaker perception of stress in Chinese may be that variations in the fundamental frequency of speech, which in many other languages serve as a cue for stress, are used in Chinese primarily to realize the tones. Nonetheless, there is still a link between stress and pitch - the range of pitch variation (for a given tone) has been observed to be greater on syllables that carry more stress.^[1]:134,231

As discussed above, weak syllables have neutral tone and are unstressed. Although this property can be contrastive, the contrast is interpreted by some as being primarily one of tone rather than stress. (Some linguists analyze Chinese as lacking word stress entirely.)^[1]:134

Apart from this contrast between full and weak syllables, some linguists have also identified differences in levels of stress among full syllables. In some descriptions, a multi-syllable word or compound^[f] is said to have the strongest stress on the final syllable, and the next strongest generally on the first syllable. Others, however, reject this analysis, noting that the apparent final-syllable stress can be ascribed purely to natural lengthening of the final syllable of a phrase, and disappears when a word is pronounced within a sentence rather than in isolation. San Duanmu^[1]:136ff takes this view, and concludes that it is the first syllable that is most strongly stressed. He also notes a tendency for Chinese to produce trochees - feet consisting of a stressed syllable followed by one (or in this case sometimes more) unstressed syllables. On this view, if the effect of "final-lengthening" is factored out:

• In words (compounds) of two syllables, the first syllable has the main stress, and the second lacks stress.
• In words (compounds) of three syllables, the first syllable is stressed most strongly, the second lacks stress, and the third may lack stress or have secondary stress.
• In words (compounds) of four syllables, the first syllable is stressed most strongly, the second lacks stress, and the third or fourth may lack stress or have secondary stress depending on the syntactic structure of the compound.

The positions described here as lacking stress are the positions in which weak (neutral-tone) syllables may occur, although full syllables frequently occur in these positions also.

There is a strong tendency for Chinese prose to employ four-syllable 'prosodic words' consisting of alternating stressed and unstressed syllables which are further subdivided into two trochaic feet. This structure, sometimes known as a 'four-character template' (), is particularly prevalent in chengyu, which are classical idioms that are usually four characters in length.^[29] Statistical analysis of chengyu and other idiomatic phrases in vernacular texts indicates that the four-syllable prosodic word had become an important metrical consideration by the Wei/Jin dynasties (4th century CE).^[30]

This preference for trochaic feet may even result in polysyllabic words in which the foot and word (morpheme) boundaries do not align. For example, 'Czechoslovakia' is stressed as ??/??/?? and 'Yugoslavia' is stressed as ??/??, even though the morpheme boundaries are /? 'Czech[o]/slovak[ia]' and ?/ 'South/slav[ia]', respectively. The preferred stress pattern also has a complex effect on tone sandhi for the various Chinese dialects.^[31]

This preference for a trochaic metrical structure is also cited as a reason for certain phenomena of word order variation within complex compounds, and for the strong tendency to use disyllabic words rather than monosyllables in certain positions.^[1]:145-194 Many Chinese monosyllables have alternative disyllabic forms with virtually identical meaning - see Chinese grammar § Word formation.

Another function of voice pitch is to carry intonation. Chinese makes frequent use of particles to express certain meanings such as doubt, query, command, etc., reducing the need to use intonation. However, intonation is still present in Chinese (expressing meanings rather similarly as in standard English), although there are varying analyses of how it interacts with the lexical tones. Some linguists describe an additional intonation rise or fall at the end of the last syllable of an utterance, while others have found that the pitch of the entire utterance is raised or lowered according to the desired intonational meaning.^[1]:234

Notes

References

Citations

Works cited

• Chao, Yuen Ren (1948). Mandarin Primer: an Intensive Course in Spoken Chinese. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-73288-9.
• Chao, Yuen Ren (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese (2nd ed.). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-00219-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Duanmu, San (2000). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• ——— (2007). The Phonology of Standard Chinese (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Lin, Yen-Hwei (2007). The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Ladefoged, Peter; Wu, Zongji (1984). "Places of Articulation: An Investigation of Pekingese Fricatives". Journal of Phonetics. 12: 267-78. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30883-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• ———; Maddieson, Ian (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Lee, Wai-Sum; Zee, Eric (2003). "Standard Chinese (Beijing)" (PDF). Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 33 (1): 109-112. doi:10.1017/S0025100303001208.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Norman, Jerry (1988). Chinese. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29653-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• Zhu, Xiaonong; Wang, Caiyu (2015). "Tone". In Wang, William S.-Y.; Sun, Chaofen (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. Oxford University Press. pp. 503-515. ISBN 978-0-19-985633-6.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
• , (2008). (8th ed.). ?. ISBN 978-9-570-91808-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

External links

• Media related to Mandarin pronunciation at Wikimedia Commons
• Media related to Chinese pronunciation at Wikimedia Commons