Orthographia Bohemica
Get Orthographia Bohemica essential facts below. View Videos or join the Orthographia Bohemica discussion. Add Orthographia Bohemica to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Orthographia Bohemica
Jan Hus, regarded as the author

De orthographia bohemica (English: On Bohemian Orthography) is a Latin work published between 1406 and 1412. It is attributed to Charles University rector and reformer Jan Hus. The book codified the Czech language's modern spelling and orthography and had decisive impact on the orthography of a number of other European languages.

Orthographia bohemica was the first known document in which spelling reforms were suggested for a Slavic language. It introduced, among other reforms, the diacritic signs ´ and ? which are now besides Czech used in the Baltic languages Lithuanian and Latvian, in other Slavic languages like Croatian, Slovak, Slovenian and partly Polish, and in several other European languages[further explanation needed].


Literacy in native languages became also one of the chief projects for the Czech Reformation including the first Hussites but especially for their later Unity of the Brethren branch with their bishop Comenius. While the author's identity and the precise date of authorship are unknown, it is widely held that the author is Jan Hus and the year of creation somewhere between 1406 and 1412, based on historical and philological studies.


The primary purpose of De orthographia bohemica was to simplify and unify Czech orthography in order to promote literacy by making the language "clearer and easier" to read and write. Instead of representing sounds using digraphs and trigraphs, it proposed a "diacritic orthography", where one letter indicates only one sound, and different but related sounds (such as those now represented by r and ?) are distinguished by diacritics. Briefly, one can summarize the spelling changes in Orthographia Bohemica as follows:

  • The basic letters of the Latin alphabet (as well as the Latin digraph ch) were to be used for writing Czech, with sound values according to the conventions of medieval Latin pronunciation in Bohemia at the time. The only difference was that the letter c was always to be used to represent the sound /ts/, and never for /k/. d represented /d/ as in Latin, and the letter g before e and i represented /j/; in other cases g represented /?/.
? ?
Í í
? ?
  • Czech consonants that Latin did not possess would be represented by a Latin letter adorned with a diacritic dot. In particular, as Czech additionally possessed palatalized consonants and a hard l, the dot indicated softness above n, d, t, c and z, and hardness for l.
  • Long vowels (which Latin possessed but did not indicate) were to be indicated by the ?árka (an acute accent) above a, e, i and y.

To illustrate the simple and revolutionary nature of this spelling, take as an example the various ways of representing ?, compared with that seen in the grammar of Jan Gebauer. In manuscripts written before Hus, all of the following representations were in use: rz, rrz, rs, rzs, rzss, zr, sr, rzs and rzz. Long vowels were written either with no indication of the length, or written double (sometimes with the second letter written in superscript), or with any of a wide and unstandardized range of diacritical marks. One could not even assume that the same scribe would consistently use their own conventions, and their use often varied even within a single manuscript.

Significance and impact

Emmaus Monastery in Prague was the last monastery in the kingdom still using the historic Slavic Glagolitic script

Orthographia bohemica was the first known document in which such spelling reforms were suggested for a Slavic language. It is not yet fully clear where Jan Hus drew inspiration for this work. Considered in the context of the contemporaneous study of letters of St. Jerome by Danish scholars of Hebrew working at the Sorbonne, there was a good knowledge of such orthographic practices at the time (particularly the designation of long vowels). According to a study by F. V. Mare?, a stimulus for the project was the author's knowledge of Glagolitic, used by Croatian monks in the Emmaus Monastery (Na Slovanech) in Prague.

The significance of the document lies in the longevity and wide application of its logical system of diacritics. Its impact is apparent in the Námská mluvnice ("Grammar of Nám"), the first grammar of the Czech language, published in 1533, but the adoption of the new rules was relatively slow and far from uniform. Throughout the 16th century, some printers and typesetters ignored the prescriptions of Orthographia bohemica and continued to maintain some digraphs (e.g. ss for /?/ instead of ?), although their use became considerably more uniform. In addition, scribes adopted the new rules much more slowly than book printers.

Discovery and publication

Franti?ek Palacký who found the original manuscript

The manuscript for Orthographia bohemica was found by Franti?ek Palacký on 13 August 1826, in T?ebo? in the south of Bohemia. The public was made aware of the existence of the work a year later, with the first issue of the newly founded journal ?asopis spole?nosti vlastenského Museum v ?echách ("Journal of the Society of the National Museum in Bohemia"), but its publication had to wait a further thirty years. The Latin text with translation appeared in 1857 in Slavische Bibliothek in Vienna thanks to A. V. ?embera, who worked at the time at the university as Professor of Czech Language and Literature. A year later in Prague, the fifth volume of Mistra Jana Husi sebrané spisy ("Collected Works of Master Jan Hus") appeared with a Czech translation and a short introduction by Václav Flaj?hans, to date the latest Czech translation of this manuscript. The Latin text was published twice more: first in the unaltered ?embera edition by Slavische Bibliothek (Amsterdam, 1965) and second with a German translation and commentary by J. Schröpfer in Wiesbaden, Germany in 1968.

?embera's Latin text was probably taken directly from Palacký's copy of the manuscript; Schröpfer produced a new revised (though not flawless) edition of the manuscript. A critical evaluation comparing the preserved T?ebo? manuscript with the extant excerpts has yet to appear.

Preserved manuscripts

Prague Castle, location of the remaining excerpts

A manuscript of Orthographia bohemica in Jan Hus' hand has still not been found; the only complete copy of the manuscript which is available for study was written by a monk Old?ich K?í? of T?ebo? (i.e. the copy found by Palacký). Its age can not be accurately determined as the copy is not dated. The end of the manuscript contains the inscription In die Leonardi, i.e. on January 6; however, this may indicate either the date of completion of the original manuscript or Old?ich K?í?'s copy. In the same volume as Orthographia bohemica, however, are some more works: three of them bear the year 1459 and one 1457. The writings are not arranged chronologically, however, and so they serve only as an approximate guide for determining the age of the manuscript.

In addition to the K?í? manuscript there are various excerpts deposited in the archives of Prague Castle. Ane?ka Vidmanová's comparative study with the manuscript of Old?ich K?í? shows that the T?ebo? manuscript is unreliable in many places.

See also


Historical grammars

  • Gebauer, Jan. Historická mluvnice jazyka ?eského. Díl I, Hláskosloví. ?SAV, Prague 1963.
  • Lamprechtt. Vývoj fonologického systému ?eského jazyka. Universita J. E. Purkyn?, Brno 1966.

Orthographia Bohemica

  • Barto?, F. M.: K Husovu spisku o ?eském pravopise, in: Jiho?eský sborník historický, Tábor 1949, p. 33-38.
  • Hus, Jan (1857). Aloys Vojt?ch ?embera (ed.). Orthographia Bohemica [Ortografie ?eská] (in Latin and Czech). Vienna.
  • Hus, Jan. Pravopis ?eský, in: Mistra Jana Husi Sebrané spisy. Svazek V. Spisy ?eské, díl II. P?el. Milan Svoboda, úvody a vysv?tlivkami opat?il prof. dr. Václav Flaj?hans, Praha 1858, p. 105-113.
  • Mare?, Franti?ek Václav. Emauzské prameny ?eského diakritického pravopisu, in: Z tradic slovanské kultury v ?echách, Prague 1975, p. 169-172.
  • Orthographia Bohemica. Ed. Kate?ina Voleková, Czech translation Ond?ej Koupil, English translation Marcela Koupilová and David Livingstone. Praha: Akropolis, 2019. ISBN 978-80-7470-234-1
  • Palacký, Franti?ek. Literní zprávy, inasopis spole?nosti vlastenského Museum v ?echách. První ro?ní b?h. Svazek první. ?eské Museum, Prague 1827, p. 132-140.
  • Schröpfer, Johann. Hussens traktat "Orthographia Bohemica" - Die Herkunft des diakritischen Systems in der Schreibung slavischer Sprachen und die Älteste zusammenhängende Beschreibung slavischer Laute. Wiesbaden, 1968.
  • Vidmanová, Ane?ka. Ke spisku Orthographia Bohemica, in: Listy filologické, 1982, p. 75-89.

  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.



Music Scenes