Newton's Notation

Get Newton's Notation essential facts below. View Videos or join the Newton's Notation discussion. Add Newton's Notation to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Leibniz's notation

*dy**dx**d*^{2}*y**dx*^{2}
### Leibniz's notation for antidifferentiation

## Lagrange's notation

*f*(*x*)
### Lagrange's notation for antidifferentiation

*f*^{(−1)}(*x*)

*f*^{(−2)}(*x*)
## Euler's notation

*D*_{x}y

*D*^{2}*f*
### Euler's notation for antidifferentiation

*D*^{−1}

_{x}*y*

*D*^{−2}*f*
## Newton's notation

*?**?*
### Newton's notation for integration

*x?**x?*
## Partial derivatives

*f*_{x}*f*_{xy}
## Notation in vector calculus

**A**
## See also

## References

## External links

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Newton's Notation

In differential calculus, there is no single uniform **notation for differentiation**. Instead, several different notations for the derivative of a function or variable have been proposed by different mathematicians. The usefulness of each notation varies with the context, and it is sometimes advantageous to use more than one notation in a given context. The most common notations for differentiation (and its opposite operation, the antidifferentiation or indefinite integration) are listed below.

The original notation employed by Gottfried Leibniz is used throughout mathematics. It is particularly common when the equation *y* = *f*(*x*) is regarded as a functional relationship between dependent and independent variables *y* and *x*. Leibniz's notation makes this relationship explicit by writing the derivative as

The function whose value at *x* is the derivative of *f* at *x* is therefore written

Higher derivatives are written as

This is a suggestive notational device that comes from formal manipulations of symbols, as in,

Logically speaking, these equalities are not theorems. Instead, they are simply definitions of notation.

The value of the derivative of *y* at a point *x* = *a* may be expressed in two ways using Leibniz's notation:

- .

Leibniz's notation allows one to specify the variable for differentiation (in the denominator). This is especially helpful when considering partial derivatives. It also makes the chain rule easy to remember and recognize:

Leibniz's notation for differentiation does not require assigning a meaning to symbols such as *dx* or *dy* on their own, and some authors do not attempt to assign these symbols meaning. Leibniz treated these symbols as infinitesimals. Later authors have assigned them other meanings, such as infinitesimals in non-standard analysis or exterior derivatives.

Some authors and journals set the differential symbol *d* in roman type instead of italic: d*x*. The ISO/IEC 80000 scientific style guide recommends this style.

? *y* *dx*

*y* *dx*^{2}

Leibniz introduced the integral symbol ? in *Analyseos tetragonisticae pars secunda* and *Methodi tangentium inversae exempla* (both from 1675). It is now the standard symbol for integration.

One of the most common modern notations for differentiation is due to Joseph Louis Lagrange. In Lagrange's notation, a prime mark denotes a derivative. If *f* is a function, then its derivative evaluated at *x* is written

- .

Lagrange first used the notation in unpublished works, and it appeared in print in 1770.^{[1]}

Higher derivatives are indicated using additional prime marks, as in for the second derivative and for the third derivative. The use of repeated prime marks eventually becomes unwieldy. Some authors continue by employing Roman numerals, usually in lower case,^{[2]}^{[3]} as in

to denote fourth, fifth, sixth, and higher order derivatives. Other authors use Arabic numerals in parentheses, as in

This notation also makes it possible to describe the *n*th derivative, where *n* is a variable. This is written

Unicode characters related to Lagrange's notation include

- ?′ PRIME (derivative)
- ?″ DOUBLE PRIME (double derivative)
- ?‴ TRIPLE PRIME (third derivative)
- ?⁗ QUADRUPLE PRIME (fourth derivative)

When there are two independent variables for a function *f*(*x*,*y*), the following convention may be followed:^{[4]}

When taking the antiderivative, Lagrange followed Leibniz's notation:^{[1]}

However, because integration is the inverse of differentiation, Lagrange's notation for higher order derivatives extends to integrals as well. Repeated integrals of *f* may be written as

- for the first integral (this is easily confused with the inverse function ),
- for the second integral,
- for the third integral, and
- for the
*n*th integral.

Leonhard Euler's notation uses a differential operator suggested by Louis François Antoine Arbogast, denoted as *D* (**D operator**)^{[5]} or *D?* (**Newton-Leibniz operator**)^{[6]} When applied to a function *f*(*x*), it is defined by

Higher derivatives are notated as powers of *D*, as in^{[4]}

- for the second derivative,
- for the third derivative, and
- for the
*n*th derivative.

Euler's notation leaves implicit the variable with respect to which differentiation is being done. However, this variable can also be notated explicitly. When *f* is a function of a variable *x*, this is done by writing^{[4]}

- for the first derivative,
- for the second derivative,
- for the third derivative, and
- for the
*n*th derivative.

When *f* is a function of several variables, it's common to use a "?" rather than *D*. As above, the subscripts denote the derivatives that are being taken. For example, the second partial derivatives of a function *f*(*x*, *y*) are:^{[4]}

Euler's notation is useful for stating and solving linear differential equations, as it simplifies presentation of the differential equation, which can make seeing the essential elements of the problem easier.

Euler's notation can be used for antidifferentiation in the same way that Lagrange's notation is.^{[7]} as follows^{[6]}

- for a first antiderivative,
- for a second antiderivative, and
- for an
*n*th antiderivative.

Newton's notation for differentiation (also called the **dot notation**, or sometimes, rudely, the **flyspeck notation**^{[8]} for differentiation) places a dot over the dependent variable. That is, if *y* is a function of *t*, then the derivative of *y* with respect to *t* is

Higher derivatives are represented using multiple dots, as in

Newton extended this idea quite far:^{[9]}

Unicode characters related to Newton's notation include:

- ?̇ COMBINING DOT ABOVE (derivative)
- ?̈ COMBINING DIAERESIS (double derivative)
- ?⃛ COMBINING THREE DOTS ABOVE (third derivative)
- ?⃜ COMBINING FOUR DOTS ABOVE (fourth derivative)
- ?̍ COMBINING VERTICAL LINE ABOVE (integral)
- ?̎ COMBINING DOUBLE VERTICAL LINE ABOVE (second integral)
- ▭ WHITE RECTANGLE (integral)
- ?⃞ COMBINING ENCLOSING SQUARE (integral)
- ?ᷠ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER N (
*n*th derivative)

Newton's notation is generally used when the independent variable denotes time. If location *y* is a function of *t*, then denotes velocity^{[10]} and denotes acceleration.^{[11]} This notation is popular in physics and mathematical physics. It also appears in areas of mathematics connected with physics such as differential equations. It is only popular for first and second derivatives, but in applications these are usually the only derivatives that are necessary.

When taking the derivative of a dependent variable *y* = *f*(*x*), an alternative notation exists:^{[12]}

Newton developed the following partial differential operators using side-dots on a curved X ( ? ). Definitions given by Whiteside are below:^{[13]}^{[14]}

Newton developed many different notations for integration in his *Quadratura curvarum* (1704) and later works: he wrote a small vertical bar or prime above the dependent variable (*y?* ), a prefixing rectangle (?*y*), or the inclosure of the term in a rectangle (*y*) to denote the *fluent* or time integral (absement).

To denote multiple integrals, Newton used two small vertical bars or primes (*y?*), or a combination of previous symbols ?*y?**y?*, to denote the second time integral (absity).

Higher order time integrals were as follows:^{[15]}

This mathematical notation did not become widespread because of printing difficulties and the Leibniz-Newton calculus controversy.

When more specific types of differentiation are necessary, such as in multivariate calculus or tensor analysis, other notations are common.

For a function *f*(*x*), we can express the derivative using subscripts of the independent variable:

This type of notation is especially useful for taking partial derivatives of a function of several variables.

Partial derivatives are generally distinguished from ordinary derivatives by replacing the differential operator *d* with a "?" symbol. For example, we can indicate the partial derivative of with respect to *x*, but not to *y* or *z* in several ways:

- .

What makes this distinction important is that a non-partial derivative such as *may*, depending on the context, be interpreted as a rate of change in relative to when all variables are allowed to vary simultaneously, whereas with a partial derivative such as it is explicit that only one variable should vary.

Other notations can be found in various subfields of mathematics, physics, and engineering, see for example the Maxwell relations of thermodynamics. The symbol is the derivative of the temperature *T* with respect to the volume *V* while keeping constant the entropy (subscript) *S*, while is the derivative of the temperature with respect to the volume while keeping constant the pressure *P*. This becomes necessary in situations where the number of variables exceeds the degrees of freedom, so that one has to choose which other variables are to be kept fixed.

Higher-order partial derivatives with respect to one variable are expressed as

Mixed partial derivatives can be expressed as

In this last case the variables are written in inverse order between the two notations, explained as follows:

Vector calculus concerns differentiation and integration of vector or scalar fields. Several notations specific to the case of three-dimensional Euclidean space are common.

Assume that (*x*, *y*, *z*) is a given Cartesian coordinate system, that **A** is a vector field with components , and that is a scalar field.

The differential operator introduced by William Rowan Hamilton, written ? and called del or nabla, is symbolically defined in the form of a vector,

where the terminology *symbolically* reflects that the operator ? will also be treated as an ordinary vector.

?*?*

**Gradient**: The gradient of the scalar field is a vector, which is symbolically expressed by the multiplication of ? and scalar field*,*

**Divergence**: The divergence of the vector field**A**is a scalar, which is symbolically expressed by the dot product of ? and the vector**A**,

?^{2}*?*

**Laplacian**: The Laplacian of the scalar field is a scalar, which is symbolically expressed by the scalar multiplication of ?^{2}and the scalar field*?*,

?×**A**

**Rotation**: The rotation , or , of the vector field**A**is a vector, which is symbolically expressed by the cross product of ? and the vector**A**,

Many symbolic operations of derivatives can be generalized in a straightforward manner by the gradient operator in Cartesian coordinates. For example, the single-variable product rule has a direct analogue in the multiplication of scalar fields by applying the gradient operator, as in

Many other rules from single variable calculus have vector calculus analogues for the gradient, divergence, curl, and Laplacian.

Further notations have been developed for more exotic types of spaces. For calculations in Minkowski space, the d'Alembert operator, also called the d'Alembertian, wave operator, or box operator is represented as , or as when not in conflict with the symbol for the Laplacian.

- ^
^{a}^{b}Lagrange,*Nouvelle méthode pour résoudre les équations littérales par le moyen des séries*(1770), p. 25-26. http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/dms/load/img/?PID=PPN308900308%7CLOG_0017&physid=PHYS_0031 **^**Morris, Carla C. (2015-07-28).*Fundamentals of calculus*. Stark, Robert M., 1930-2017. Hoboken, New Jersey. ISBN 9781119015314. OCLC 893974565.**^**Osborne, George A. (1908).*Differential and Integral Calculus*. Boston: D. C. Heath and co. pp. 63-65.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}*The Differential and Integral Calculus*(Augustus De Morgan, 1842). pp. 267-268 **^**"The D operator - Differential - Calculus - Maths Reference with Worked Examples".*www.codecogs.com*. Archived from the original on 2016-01-19.- ^
^{a}^{b}Weisstein, Eric W. "Differential Operator." From*MathWorld*--A Wolfram Web Resource. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-01-21. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) **^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Repeated Integral." From*MathWorld*--A Wolfram Web Resource. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-02-01. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)**^**Zill, Dennis G. (2009). "1.1".*A First Course in Differential Equations*(9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-495-10824-5.**^**Newton's notation reproduced from:- 1st to 5th derivatives:
*Quadratura curvarum*(Newton, 1704), p. 7 (p. 5r in original MS: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-02-28. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)). - 1st to 7th,
*n*th and (*n*+1)th derivatives:*Method of Fluxions*(Newton, 1736), pp. 313-318 and p. 265 (p. 163 in original MS: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-04-06. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)) - 1st to 5th derivatives :
*A Treatise of Fluxions*(Colin MacLaurin, 1742), p. 613 - 1st to 4th and
*n*th derivatives: Articles "Differential" and "Fluxion",*Dictionary of Pure and Mixed Mathematics*(Peter Barlow, 1814) - 1st to 4th, 10th and
*n*th derivatives: Articles 622, 580 and 579 in*A History of Mathematical Notations*(F .Cajori, 1929) - 1st to 6th and
*n*th derivatives:*The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton*Vol. 7 1691-1695 (D. T. Whiteside, 1976), pp.88 and 17 - 1st to 3rd and
*n*th derivatives:*A History of Analysis*(Hans Niels Jahnke, 2000), pp. 84-85

*n*th derivative may be omitted ( )- 1st to 5th derivatives:
**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Overdot." From*MathWorld*--A Wolfram Web Resource. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2015-09-05. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Double Dot." From*MathWorld*--A Wolfram Web Resource. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)**^**Article 580 in Florian Cajori,*A History of Mathematical Notations*(1929), Dover Publications, Inc. New York. ISBN 0-486-67766-4**^**"Patterns of Mathematical Thought in the Later Seventeenth Century",*Archive for History of Exact Sciences*Vol. 1, No. 3 (D. T. Whiteside, 1961), pp. 361-362,378**^**S.B. Engelsman has given more strict definitions in*Families of Curves and the Origins of Partial Differentiation*(2000), pp. 223-226**^**Newton's notation for integration reproduced from:- 1st to 3rd integrals:
*Quadratura curvarum*(Newton, 1704), p. 7 (p. 5r in original MS: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-02-28. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)) - 1st to 3rd integrals:
*Method of Fluxions*(Newton, 1736), pp. 265-266 (p. 163 in original MS: "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-04-06. Retrieved .CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)) - 4th integrals:
*The Doctrine of Fluxions*(James Hodgson, 1736), pp. 54 and 72 - 1st to 2nd integrals: Articles 622 and 365 in
*A History of Mathematical Notations*(F .Cajori, 1929)

*n*th integral notation is deducted from the*n*th derivative. It could be used in*Methodus Incrementorum Directa & Inversa*(Brook Taylor, 1715)- 1st to 3rd integrals:

- Earliest Uses of Symbols of Calculus, maintained by Jeff Miller.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists