Get Homo Neanderthalensis essential facts below. View Videos or join the Homo Neanderthalensis discussion. Add Homo Neanderthalensis to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
It is unclear when Neanderthals split from humans, with DNA studies ranging from 182 kya to before 800 kya, and the time of divergence from the ancestral Homo heidelbergensis is also vague. The oldest potential Neanderthal bones are dated to 430 kya, but the classification is uncertain. They are known from numerous fossils, especially following 130 kya. The type specimen, Neanderthal 1, was found in 1856 in the German Neander Valley. After much debate over its validity, Neanderthals were depicted as being primitive, stupid, and brutish, for much of the early 20th century. Though their image in the scientific community has markedly changed since, the unevolved cavemanarchetype remains prevalent in popular culture.
Compared to modern humans, Neanderthals were stockier, with somewhat shorter limbs and a larger chest and nose. These are often explained as adaptations to conserve heat in a cold climate, but are more likely adaptations for sprinting in the warmer, forested landscape they often inhabited, and products of genetic drift. The braincases of Neanderthal men and women averaged about 1,600 cm3 (98 cu in) and 1,300 cm3 (79 cu in) respectively, within the range of the values for modern humans. Average Neanderthal men stood around 165 cm (5.5 ft) and women 153 cm (5 ft) tall, similar to contemporary humans.
Neanderthal 1, the type specimen, was known as the "Neanderthal cranium" or "Neanderthal skull" in anthropological literature, and the individual reconstructed on the basis of the skull was occasionally called "the Neanderthal man". The binomial name Homo neanderthalensis--extending the name "Neanderthal man" from the individual type specimen to the entire group, and formally recognizing it as distinct from humans--was first proposed by Irish geologist William King in a paper read to the 33rd British Science Association in 1863. However, in 1864, he recommended the genus name also be distinct from humans as he compared the Neanderthal braincase to that of a chimpanzee and argued it was "incapable of moral and theositic conceptions".
Ernst Haeckel's Primate family tree showing H. stupidus (Neanderthal) as the ancestor to H. sapiens
The German spelling of "Thal" ("valley") was current until 1901; it is now spelt "Tal".[a] The spelling "Neandertal" is occasionally seen in English, even in scientific publications. Since "Neanderthal" and "Neandertal" are common names, there is no authoritative prescription on its spelling, unlike the spelling of the binominal name, H. neanderthalensis, which is predicated by King, 1864. The common name in German is invariably "Neandertaler" (lit. "of the valley of Neander"), not "Neandertal", but the spelling of the name of the Neander Valley itself ("Neandertal" vs. "Neanderthal") has been affected by the species name, the names of the Neanderthal Museum and of Neanderthal station persisting with pre-20th-century spelling.
By the early 20th century, numerous other Neanderthal discoveries were made, establishing Neanderthal as a legitimate species, the most influential specimen La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1. French palaeontologist Marcellin Boule made several publications, among the first to establish palaeontology as a science, detailing the specimen, but reconstructed it as ape-like and only remotely related to humans, and fueled the popular image of Neanderthals as barbarous, slouching, club-wielding primitives; this image was reproduced for several decades and popularised in science fiction works, such as the 1911 The Quest for Fire by J.-H. Rosny aîné and the 1927 The Grisly Folk by H. G. Wells where they are depicted as monsters. In 1911, Scottish anthropologist Arthur Keith reconstructed La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1 as an immediate precursor to humans, sitting next to a fire, producing tools, wearing a necklace, and having a more humanlike posture, but this failed to garner much scientific rapport, and Keith later abandoned his thesis in 1915.
By the middle of the century, based on several recent findings of other human ancestors (such as Homo erectus), the scientific community began to rework its understanding of Neanderthals. Ideas such as Neanderthal behaviour, intelligence, and culture were being discussed, and a more humanlike image of them emerged. In 1939, American anthropologist Carlton Coon reconstructed a Neanderthal in a modern business suit and hat to emphasize that they would be, more or less, indistinguishable from humans had they survived into the present. William Golding's 1955 novel The Inheritors depicts Neanderthals as much more emotional and civilised. However, Boule's image continued to influence works until the 1960s. In modern day, Neanderthal reconstructions are often very humanlike.
Phylogeny of Hominina based on comparison of ancient proteomes and genomes with those of modern species.
Neanderthals are hominids in the genusHomo, and generally classified as a distinct species, H. neanderthalensis, though sometimes as a subspecies of human as H. sapiens neanderthalensis. This would necessitate the classification of modern humans as H. s. sapiens.
A large part of the controversy stems from the vagueness of the term "species", as it is generally used to distinguish two genetically isolated populations, but admixture between modern humans and Neanderthals is known to have occurred. However, the absence of Neanderthal-derived patrilineal Y-chromosome and matrilineal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in modern humans, along with the underrepresentation of Neanderthal X chromosome DNA, could imply reduced fertility or frequent sterility of some hybrid crosses, representing a partial biological reproductive barrier between the groups.
In 2014, geneticist Svante Pääbo described such "taxonomic wars" as unresolveable, "since there is no definition of species perfectly describing the case."
Neanderthals were more closely related to Denisovans than to humans based on nuclear DNA. However modern humans and Neanderthals share a more recent common mitochondrial lineage than that of Denisovans. This likely resulted from an interbreeding event subsequent to the Neanderthal/Denisovan split which introduced another mtDNA line. This involved either introgression coming from an unknown archaic human into Denisovans, or the mtDNA of Neanderthals being replaced by that of a modern human lineage deriving from an early H. sapiens wave from Africa. Older specimens show distinct genetic populations of Neanderthals in different regions, but DNA samples from Mezmaiskaya Cave in the Caucasus and Denisova Cave in the SiberianAltai Mountains show apparent replacement of their local populations by a different population also found in Western European sites.
It is largely thought that H. heidelbergensis was the last common ancestor of Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern humans after populations became isolated in Europe, Asia, and Africa respectively. The taxonomic distinction between H. heidelbergensis and Neanderthals is mostly due to a fossil gap in Europe between 300 and 243 thousand years ago (kya) during Marine isotope stage 8. "Neanderthals", by conventions, are fossils which date to after this gap. However, 430,000 year (ka) old bones at Sima de los Huesos could represent early Neanderthals or a closely related group, and the 400 ky old Aroeira 3 could represent a transitional phase. Basal and derived morphs could have lived concurrently. The quality of the fossil record greatly increases from 130,000 years ago (kya) onwards, and make up the bulk of known Neanderthal skeletons. Dental remains from the Italian Visogliano and Fontana Ranuccio sites indicate that Neanderthal dental features had evolved by around 450-430 kya during the Middle Pleistocene.
There are two main hypotheses regarding the evolution of Neanderthals following the Neanderthal/human split: two-step and accretion. The former argues a single major environmental event-such as the Saale glaciation-caused European H. heidelbergensis to rapidly increase body size, robustness, and an enlengthenment of the head, which then led to other changes in skull anatomy. However, Neanderthal anatomy was most likely not driven by adapting to cold weather. The latter holds that Neanderthals slowly evolved over time from the ancestral H. heidelbergensis, divided into 4 stages: early-pre-Neanderthals (MIS 12), pre-Neanderthals (MIS 11-9), early Neanderthals (MIS 7-5), and classic Neanderthals (MIS 4-3).
Numerous dates for the Neanderthal/human split exist. The date of around 250 kya cites the Florisbad Skull ("H. helmei") as being the last common ancestor (LCA), and the split is associated with the Levallois technique of making stone tools. The date of about 400 kya uses H. heidelbergensis as the LCA. 600 kya says that "H. rhodesiensis" was the LCA, which split off into a human lineage and a Neanderthal/H. heidelbergensis lineage. 800 kya has H. antecessor as the LCA; however, different variations of this model would push the date back to 1 million years ago. DNA studies have yielded various results on divergence time, such as 592-182 kya, 553-321 kya, 654-475 kya, 690-550 kya, 765-550 kya, 800-520 kya, before 800 kya, and so forth.
Neanderthals and Denisovans are more closely related to each other than they are to humans, meaning the Neanderthal/Denisovan split occurred after their split with humans. Using a mutation rate of 1x10-9 or 0.5x10-9 per base pair (bp) per year, the Neanderthal/Denisovan split occurred around either 236-190 kya or 473-381 kya respectively. Using 1.1x10-8 per generation with a new generation every 29 years, the time is 744 kya. Using 5x10-10nucleotide site per year, it is 644 kya. Using the latter dates, the split had likely already occurred by the time hominins spread out across Europe, and unique Neanderthal features had begun evolving by 600-500 kya.
Early Neanderthals, living before the Eemian interglacial (130 kya), are poorly known and come mostly from European sites. From 130 kya onwards, the quality of the fossil record increases dramatically, recorded from Western, Central, Eastern, and Mediterranean Europe, as well as Southwest, Central, and Northern Asia up to the Altai Mountains in southern Siberia.
The southernmost find was recorded at Shuqba Cave, Levant, and the easternmost at Denisova Cave, Siberia 85°E. The southeast Chinese Maba Man, a skull, shares several physical attributes with Neanderthals, though these may be the result of convergent evolution rather than Neanderthals extending their range to the Pacific Ocean. The limit of their northern bound appears to have been 53°N (Bontnewydd, Wales), although it is difficult to assess because glacial advances destroy most human remains. Middle Palaeolithic artefacts have been found up to 60°N on the Russian plains, but these are more likely attributed to humans. A 2017 study claimed the presence of Homo at the 130 ka Californian Cerutti Mastodon site, but this is highly unlikely.
It is unknown how the rapidly fluctuation climate of the last glacial period (Dansgaard-Oeschger events) impacted Neanderthals, as warming periods would produce more favorable temperatures, but encourage forest growth and deter megafauna; whereas frigid periods would produce the opposite. Populations may have peaked in cold but not extreme intervals, such as marine isotope stages 8 and 6. It is possible their range expanded and contracted as the ice retreated and grew respectively to avoid permafrost areas, residing in certain refuge zones. However, Neanderthals may have preferred a forested landscape.
Distribution of Neanderthals and locations of main excavation sites
Like modern humans, Neanderthals probably descended from a very small population with an effective population-the number of individuals who can bear children-of 3,000 to 12,000 approximately. However, Neanderthals maintained this very low population, living in small, isolated, inbred groups.
Various studies, using mtDNA analysis, yield varying effective populations, such as about 1,000 to 5,000; 5,000 to 9,000 remaining constant; or 3,000 to 25,000 steadily increasing until 50,000 BCE before declining until extinction. However, all agree on low population, which may have been up to 10 times smaller than contemporary human populations in Western Europe. Estimates giving a total population in the tens of thousands are contested. A consistently low population may be explained in the context of the "Boserupian Trap": a population's carrying capacity is limited by the amount of food it can obtain, which in turn is limited by its technology. Innovation increases with population, but if the population is too low, innovation will not occur very rapidly and the population will remain low. This is consistent with the apparent 150 kya stagnation in Neanderthal technology.
This low population caused a low genetic diversity, inbreeding, and reduced the population's ability to filter out harmful mutations. However, it is unknown how this affected a single Neanderthal's genetic burden and, thus, if this caused a higher rate of birth defects than in humans. It is known, however, that the Neanderthals of Sidrón Cave displayed several birth defects.
In a sample of 206 Neanderthals, based on the abundance of young and mature adults in comparison to other age demographics, about 80% of them above the age of 20 died before reaching 40. This high mortality rate was probably due to their high-stress environment. However, it has also been estimated that the age pyramids for Neanderthals and Upper Paleolithic humans were the same. Infant mortality was very high, about 43% in northern Eurasia.
Neanderthals had a more robust and stockier build than humans, though still maintained an upright posture; wider and barrel-shaped rib cage; wider pelvis; and proportionally shorter forearms and forelegs.
Based on 45 Neanderthals long bones from 14 men and 7 women, the average height was 164 to 168 cm (5.4 to 5.5 ft) for men and 152 to 156 cm (5 ft) for women. For comparison, the average height of 16 Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic humans was 168.1 cm (5.5 ft) for men and 152.5 cm (5 ft) for women. For Neanderthal weight, samples of 26 specimens found an average of 77.6 kg (171 lb) for men and 66.4 kg (146 lb) for women. Using 76 kg (168 lb), the body mass index for Neanderthal men was calculated to be 2.69-2.82, which in humans correlates to obesity. This indicates a very stocky build.
Body proportions are usually cited as being "hyperarctic" as adaptations to the cold, as they are similar to those of human populations which developed in cold climates-the Neanderthal build is most similar to Eskimos-and shorter limbs equates to higher retention of body heat, but Neanderthals from more temperate climates-such as Iberia-still retain the "hyperarctic" physique. Further, the increasing evidence that Neanderthals preferred warmer wooded areas instead of open mammoth steppe and cold climate suggests to the contrary, and DNA analysis indicates a higher proportion of fast-twitch muscle fibers in the Neanderthals than humans. It is possible their body proportions and greater muscle mass were adaptations to sprinting as opposed to the endurance-oriented human physique, as shorter limbs reduce moment arm at the limbs, which allows for greater rotational force at the wrists and ankles without extra exertion of the rotating muscles at the elbows and knees by increasing the speed at which the muscles contract, allowing for faster acceleration.
Neanderthals had a reduced chin, sloping forehead, and large nose[b] which also started somewhat higher on the face than in modern humans. The Neanderthal skull is typically more elongated and less globular than that of humans, and features an occipital bun, or "chignon", a protrusion on the back of the skull, though it is within the range of variation for humans who have it. It is caused by the cranial base and temporal bones being placed higher and more towards the front of the skull, and a flatter skullcap. They likely also had larger eyes to adapt to the low-light environment.
The large Neanderthal nose and paranasal sinuses were once thought to warm air as it entered the lungs and retain moisture ("nasal radiator hypothesis"), but the bone structure does not indicate any adaptations to cold climate, and sinuses are generally reduced in cold-adapted creatures. More likely, the large nose was caused by genetic drift; also, the sinuses are not grossly large, and are comparable in size to those of humans.
Neanderthals featured a protrusion of the jaw (prognathism), which was once cited as a response to a large bite force evidenced by heavy wearing of Neanderthal front teeth (the "anterior dental loading hypothesis"), but similar wearing trends are seen in contemporary humans. It could also have evolved to fit larger teeth in the jaw which better resists wear and abrasion, and the increased wear on the front teeth compared to the back teeth probably stem from repetitive use. Neanderthal dental wear patterns are most similar to those of modern Inuit. The bite force of Neanderthals and humans is now thought to be about the same, about 285 N (64 lbf) and 255 N (57 lbf) in human men and women, respectively.
The Neanderthal braincase averages 1,600 cm3 (98 in3) for men and 1,300 cm3 (79 in3) for women, within the possible range of modern humans, which is, on average, 1,270 cm3 (78 in3) for men and 1,130 cm3 (69 in3) for women. The largest Neanderthal brain, Amud 1, was calculated to be 1,736 cm3 (105.9 in3), one of the largest ever recorded in hominids. However, both Neanderthal and human infants measure about 400 cm3 (24 in3), and either Neanderthal brain development sped up or human development slowed down from the last common ancestor.
In Neanderthals, the occipital lobe-operating vision-was much larger than in modern humans, and, similarly, they had larger eyes, probably as an adaptation to lower light conditions in Europe. More brain tissue was devoted to bodily maintenance and control, and, consequently, the cognitive areas of the brain were proportionally smaller than in humans, including the cerebellum-operating muscle memory, and possibly language, attention, working memory, social abilities, and thought-the parietal lobes-visuospatial function and episodic memory-the temporal lobes-language comprehension and associations with emotions-the orbitofrontal cortex-decision making-and the olfactory bulb-sense of smell. A 2011 study looking at the brain asymmetry of 20 Neanderthals to predict handedness found 85% to be right-hand dominant and the remaining 15% left-handed, whereas humans are 52% right-dominant, 12% left-dominant, and 36% ambidextrous.
The lack of sunlight most likely led to the proliferation of lighter skin in Neanderthals. Genetically, BNC2 was present in Neanderthals, which is associated with light skin colour; however, a second variation of BNC2 was also present, which is associated with darker skin colour in the UK Biobank. It is likely Neanderthal skin colour varied from region to region. The DNA of three Croatian Neanderthals shows they had darker hair, skin, and eye colour than modern Europeans, though modern Europeans did not evolve light skin and hair until the Holocene.
The DNA of a Neanderthal from Monti Lessini, Valpolicella, Italy, showed depressed activity of the MC1R gene, which is associated with red or blond hair. However, like in humans, red was probably not a very common hair color.
The Neanderthal physical activity level (PAL) was assumed to be a very high 650 counts per minute per day (CPM/d), in comparison to 200 CPM/d in modern Siberian hunter-gatherers. Average body fat percentage (BFP) was estimated to be 25%, though it may have been 13% in men and 20% in women in more temperate areas. Using these measurements and average height and weight, the daily total energy expenditure (TEE)-the amount of calories consumed in one day-was estimated to be 3,454-4,019 and 3,828-4,483 kcal for men with high and low BFPs respectively, and 3,115-3,538 and 3,258-3,710 kcal for women. However, if the PAL was reduced to that of modern Siberian hunter-gatherers, the TEE becomes 2,959-3,524 and 3,333-3,988 kcal for men, and 2,620-3,043 and 2,764-3,215 kcal for women. This is comparable with the upper end of energetic demands of modern hunter gatherers, and the latter estimates are most similar to the Siberian Yakuts, which contradicts earlier estimates of vastly higher energetic demands in Neanderthals than humans. Further, some Neanderthal populations are thought to have had a predominantly low-calorie plant diet, which suggests the minimum daily caloric intake was also low.
Maximum lifespan, and the timing of adulthood, menopause, and gestation were most likely very similar to modern humans. However, it has been hypothesized that Neanderthals matured faster than modern humans based on the growth rates of teeth and tooth enamel, though this is not backed by age biomarkers.
Genetically, Neanderthal-derived alleles near ASB1 and EXOC6 are associated with being an evening person, narcolepsy, and day-time napping. In a survey, people who had archaic haplotypes near CDH6 more frequently reported feeling unenthusiasm and disinterest. These are consistent with the idea that sunlight affects circadian rhythm and mood.
Neanderthals suffered a high rate of traumatic injury, with an estimated 79-94% of specimens showing evidence of healed major trauma, of which 37-52% were severely injured, and 13-19% before reaching adulthood; and an estimated 80% succumbed to their injuries and died before reaching 40. It was thus theorized that Neanderthals employed a risky hunting strategy, though rates of cranial trauma are not significantly different between Neanderthals and Middle Paleolithic humans.Shanidar 1 shows signs of an amputation of the right arm likely due to a nonunion after breaking a bone in adolescence, osteomyelitis (a bone infection) on the left clavicle, an abnormal gait, vision problems in the left eye, and possible hearing loss. It is unlikely any of these are what ultimately killed him, however.
Low population also led to low genetic diversity and probably inbreeding which could have led to inbreeding depression. The 13 inhabitants of Sidrón Cave collectively exhibited 17 different birth defects likely due to this.
Artist's reconstruction of a Neanderthal man and child
Neanderthals likely lived in more sparsely distributed groups than Upper Paleolithic humans, but group size is thought to have averaged 10 to 30 individuals, similar to modern hunter-gatherers. Reliable evidence of Neanderthal group composition comes from Sidrón Cave and the footprints at Le Rozel: the former shows 7 adults, 3 adolescents, 2 juveniles, and an infant; whereas the latter, based on footprint size, shows a group of 10 to 13 members where juveniles and adolescents made up 90%.
Children were likely weaned after 5 years-one year later than humans-probably to increase birth spacing. Indicated from various ailments resulting from high stress at a low age, such as stunted growth, children of both sexes were likely put to work directly after weaning. Upon reaching adolescence, an individual would likely have been expected to join in hunting large game.
Sites showing evidence of no more than three individuals may have represented nuclear families or temporary camping sites for special task groups (such as a hunting party). Bands likely moved between certain caves depending on the season, returning to the same locations generation after generation.
A self-sustaining population which avoids inbreeding consists of about 450-500 individuals, which would necessitate these bands to interact with 8-53 other bands, but more likely the more conservative estimate given low population density. Analysis of the mtDNA of the Neanderthals of Sidrón Cave showed that the three men belonged to the same maternal lineage, while the three women belonged to different ones. This suggests that women "married out". However, the DNA of a Neanderthal from Denisova Cave shows that her parents were half-siblings, and the inhabitants of Sidrón Cave were likely highly inbred. Neanderthal groups probably rarely exchanged mates given the abundance of harmful genes.
Considering most Neanderthal artefacts were sourced no more than 5 km (3.1 mi) from the main settlement, it is unlikely these bands interacted very often. However, a skeleton from La Roche à Pierrot, France, showed a healed fracture on top of the skull apparently caused by a deep blade wound, and another from Shanadir Cave was found to have a rib lesion characteristic of projectile weapon injuries, which could be considered as evidence for conflict. Further, a few Neanderthal artefacts in a settlement could have originated 20, 30, 100, and 300 km (12.5, 18.5, 60, and 185 mi) away. It is possible that macro-bands formed, collectively encompassing 13,000 km2 (5,000 sq mi), with each band claiming 1,200-2,800 km2 (460-1,080 sq mi), maintaining strong alliances for mating networks or to cope with leaner times and enemies as is exhibited in the low-density hunter gatherer societies of the Western Desert of Australia. However, mapping of the Neanderthal brain indicates they may not have had the cognitive function required for complex social interactions and trade.
It is sometimes suggested, since they were hunters of challenging big game and lived in small groups, there was no sexual division of labour as seen in human societies. That is, men, women, and children all had to be involved in hunting, instead of just men hunting and women and children foraging which is a more efficient food-collecting system. However, in modern human societies, the higher the meat dependency, the higher the division of labour. Further, tooth wearing patterns in Neanderthal men and women suggest they commonly used their teeth for carrying items, but men exhibit more wearing on the upper teeth, and women the lower, implying some cultural differences in tasks.
It is controversially proposed that some Neanderthals wore decorative clothing or jewelry-such as a leopard skin or raptor feathers-to display elevated status in the group. The few number of Neanderthal graves found could be explained as only high-ranking members receiving an elaborate burial, as is the case for some contemporary human societies. An apparent cemetery of six or seven individuals at La Ferrassie may indicate they consciously identified as a single group.
A study looking at Neanderthal skeletons recovered from several natural rock shelters shows that, although they were recorded as bearing several trauma-related injuries, none of them had significant trauma to the legs which would debilitate movement. This might indicate that individuals who could not keep up with the group while moving from cave to cave were left behind. The high mortality rate indicates grandparents were rare. These all could indicate a culture based on the idea that self-worth derives from contributing food to the group; a debilitating injury would remove this self-worth and result in near-immediate death. In this hypothesis, elderly Neanderthals were given special burial rites for lasting so long.
Neanderthals were probably apex predators, and fed predominantly on deer, namely red deer and reindeer, as they were the most abundant game, but also on ibex, wild boar, aurochs, and less frequently mammoth, straight-tusked elephant and woolly rhinoceros. Isotope studies of Neanderthals from two French sites showed similar profiles to other carnivores, suggesting that these populations ate fresh meat. Analysis of Neanderthal bone collagen from the Croatian Vindija Cave shows nearly all of their protein needs derived from animal meat. Living in a forested environment, Neanderthals were likely ambush hunters, getting close to and attacking their target-a prime adult-in a short burst of speed, thrusting in a spear at close quarters. Younger or wounded animals may have been hunted using traps, projectiles, or pursuit.
Neanderthal diet may have varied significantly region to region, with some communities subsisting primarily on a plant-based diet. Edible plant remains are recorded from several caves. For example, Neanderthals from Sidrón Cave in Spain, based on dental tarter, likely had a meatless diet of mushrooms, pine nuts, and moss, indicating they were forest foragers. Remnants from the Israeli Amud Cave indicates a diet of figs, palm tree fruits, and various cereals and edible grasses. Several adaptations in the leg joints could possibly suggest habitual squatting, which, if the case, was likely done while gathering food.
Dental tarter from Spy Cave indicates they had a meat-heavy diet including woolly rhinoceros and mouflon sheep, while also regularly consuming mushrooms. Neanderthal faecal matter from El Salt, Spain, dated to 50 kya-the oldest human faecal matter remains recorded-show elevated coprostanol levels (digested cholesterol indicating a meat-heavy diet) and elevated stigmastanol (deriving from plant matter). Evidence of cooked food plants-mainly legumes and, to a far lesser extent, acorns-were discovered in the Israeli Kebara Cave, possibly gathering plants in spring and fall and hunting in all seasons except fall, though the cave was probably abandoned in late summer to early fall. At the Iraqi Shanidar Cave, Neanderthals collected plants with various harvest seasons, indicating they scheduled returns to the area to harvest certain plants, and that they had complex food-gathering behaviors for both meat and plants.
Neanderthals probably could employ a wide range of cooking techniques, such as roasting, and they may have been able to heat up or boil soup, stew, or animal stock. The abundance of animal bone fragments at settlements may indicate the making of fat stocks from boiling bone marrow, possibly taken from animals which had already died of starvation. These methods would have substantially increased protein consumption, which was a major component of their nutrition to compensate for low carbohydrate intake. Neanderthal tooth size had a decreasing trend after 100 kya, which could indicate an increased dependence on cooking or the advent of boiling which would soften food.
At Sidrón Cave, Neanderthals likely cooked and possibly smoked food, as well as used certain plants-such as yarrow and camomile-as flavouring, though these plants may have instead been used for their medicinal properties. Further, the former hypothesis would assume a degree of cuisine complexity which lacks proper evidence. However, flavouring food may not require greatly enhanced humanlike cognitive or imaginative abilities, as Japanese macaques are known to dunk sweet potatoes and wheat in the ocean before eating them to give them a salty taste.
The archaeological record shows they commonly used animal hide and birch bark, and it is possible they used them to make cooking containers, though this is based largely on circumstantial evidence as neither fossilise well. It is possible the Neanderthals at Kebara Cave used the shells of the spur-thighed tortoise as containers.
They likely lacked any method of storing food, and had to eat whatever they hunted or foraged immediately.
Neanderthals and cave hyaenas may have exemplified niche differentiation, and actively avoided competing with each other. Though they both mainly targeted the same groups of creatures-deer, horses, and cattle-Neanderthals mainly hunted the former and cave hyaenas the latter two. Further, animal remains from Neanderthal caves indicate they preferred to hunt prime individuals, whereas cave hyaenas hunted weaker or younger prey and had a greater proportion of carnivore remains. In fact, cave hyaena caves are distinguished from Neanderthal caves by the higher abundance of carnivore remains. Nonetheless, cave hyaenas likely stole food and leftovers from Neanderthal campsites, and scavenged on dead Neanderthal bodies.
At Spy Cave, the remains of wolves, cave lions, and cave bears-which were all major predators of the time-indicate Neanderthals hunted their competitors to some extent, and that pressure from competition was rather high. Cave lions likely targeted horses, large deer and wild cattle; and the leopard primarily reindeer and roe deer; which heavily overlapped with Neanderthal diet. However, given the ferocity of these creatures and the lack of long-range weapons, confrontations likely would have resulted in a group display of yelling, arm waving, or stone throwing; or quickly gathering meat and abandoning a kill.:120-143
These cannibalistic tendencies have been explained as either ritual defleshing, for nutritional value, or as an act of war. Due to a small number of cases, and the higher number of cut marks seen on cannibalized individuals than animals (indicating inexperience), cannibalism was probably not a very common practice, and it may have only been done in times of extreme food shortages as in some historical cases in human history. It has also been suggested evidence of butchering was caused by pre-burial defleshing to prevent scavenging by wild animals or a foul smell. However, it is not uncommon to find Neanderthal remains eaten by an animal.
Proposed Neanderthal jewelry: white-tailed eagle claw with striations at the Neanderthal site of Krapina, Croatia, circa 130,000 BP.
A large number of claims of Neanderthal art, adornment, and structures have been made which would show Neanderthals were capable of symbolic thought or were cognitively comparable to anatomically modern humans. However, many of these are ambiguously attributed as the dating interlaps with anatomically modern human presence in Europe. Among many others:
Flower pollen on the body of pre-Neanderthal Shanidar 4, Iraq, had in 1975 been argued to be a flower burial, but the pollen could have also been deposited by natural events.
In 1975, a mostly flat piece of flint with a bone pushed through a hole on the midsection-dating to 32, 40, or 75 kya-has been purported to resemble the upper half of a face, with the bone representing eyes-the Mask of la Roche-Cotard. It is contested whether it represents a face, or if it even constitutes as art.
Raptor and corvid bones, species not typically consumed by any human society, were argued to show evidence of feather plucking, specifically of the large flight feathers, by a 2012 study examining 1,699 ancient sites across Eurasia. The authors took this to mean Neanderthals wore bird feathers as personal adornments.
Two 176 ka stalagmite ring structures, several metres wide, were reported in 2016 more than 300 m (980 ft) from the entrance within Bruniquel Cave, France. Being so far inside the cave, this shows a high degree of proficiency in underground environments in Neanderthals.
In 2015, a study argued that a number of 130 ka eagle talons found in a cache near Krapina, Croatia along with Neanderthal bones, had been modified to be used as jewelry. A similar talon necklace was reported in 2019 at Cova Foradà in Spain.
In 2017, incision-decorated raven bones from the Zaskalnaya VI (Kolosovskaya) Neanderthal site, Crimea, Micoquian industry dated to 43-38 kya were reported. Given there are 17 of these objects at seven different sites in the area, and the notches on all of them are more-or-less equidistant to each other, they are very unlikely to have originated from simple butchering.
In 2018, red painted symbols comprising hand stencils, a ladder-shape figure, dots, discs, lines, and representations of animals on the cave walls of several caves across Spain 700 km (430 mi) apart, including La Pasiega, Cave of El Castillo, and Doña Trinidad-were dated to be older than 66 kya. This is at least 20 ka years prior to the arrival of anatomically modern humans in western Europe, and demonstrate Neanderthals were capable of symbolic behavior. However, the dating, and thus its attribution to Neanderthals, is contested.
In 2018, perforated seashell beads and pigments that are at least 115 kya were found in Cave of Los Aviones in southeastern Spain.
In 2018, an engraved flint flake was found in the grave a Neanderthal child in Crimea, Ukraine.
Despite the apparent 150 ka stagnation in Neanderthal innovation, there is evidence that Neanderthal technology was more sophisticated than was previously thought. However, the high frequency of potentially debilitating injuries could have prevented very complex technologies from emerging, as a major injury would have impeded an expert's ability to effectively teach a novice.
Neanderthals made stone tools, and are associated with the Mousterian industry. The Levallois technique they adopted maximizes the cutting surface with the least amount of raw material (p. As a difficult-to-learn process, the technique may have been directly taught generation to generation rather than via purely observational learning. There is some debate if they had long-ranged weapons. A wound on the neck of an African wild ass was likely inflicted by a Levallois point javelin, and there is some bone trauma consistent with habitual throwing.
Neanderthals may also be associated with the Châtelperronian 45-40 kya in central France and northern Spain, borrowing tool-making techniques from immigrating humans, namely crafting bone tools using grinding and polishing rather than the percussion technique used with stone, though Neanderthal attribution of these artefacts is contested.
Neanderthal were able to create fire, and, in a number of caves, evidence of hearths has been detected. Neanderthals likely considered air circulation when making hearths as a lack of proper ventilation for a single hearth can render a cave uninhabitable in several minutes.Abric Romaní rock shelter indicates eight evenly spaced hearths lined up against the rock wall, likely used to stay warm while sleeping, with one person sleeping on either side of the fire. At Cueva de Bolomor, with hearths lined up against the wall, the smoke flowed upwards to the ceiling, and led to outside the cave. In Grotte du Lazaret, smoke was probably naturally ventilated during the winter as the interior cave temperature was greater than the outside temperature; similarly, the cave was likely only inhabited in the winter.
It was long believed that an adhesive (birch bark tar) made by Neanderthals required to follow a complex recipe, and that it thus showed complex cognitive skills and cultural transmission. However, a 2019 study showed it can be made simply by burning birch bark on smooth vertical surfaces, such as a flat, inclined rock. They may have used plant-based resins for hafting.
As opposed to the bone sewing-needles and stitching awls of Upper Paleolithic humans, the only known Neanderthal tools that could have been used to fashion clothes are hide scrapers, which could have made items similar to blankets or ponchos. Nonetheless, Neanderthals would have needed to cover up most of their body. Contemporary humans would have covered 80-90%.
Since human/Neanderthal admixture is known to have occurred in the Middle East, and no modern body louse species descends from Neanderthals (body lice only inhabit clothed individuals), it is possible Neanderthals in hotter climates did not wear clothes, or their lice were highly specialised.
Remains of Middle Paleolithic stone tools on Greek islands indicate early seafaring by Neanderthals in the Ionian Sea possibly starting as far back as 200-150 kya. The oldest stone artefacts from Crete date to 130-107 kya, Cephalonia 125 kya, and Zakynthos 110-35 kya. Here, they likely employed simple reed boats and made one-day crossings back and forth. Other Mediterranean islands include Sardinia, Melos, Alonnisos, and it is possible they crossed the Strait of Gibraltar and sailed to Naxos (though Naxos may have been connected to land). Their ability to engineer these boats and navigate through open waters speaks to their advanced cognitive and technical skills.
The 1983 discovery of a Neanderthal hyoid bone-used in speech production in humans-in Kebara 2 almost identical to that of humans suggests Neanderthals were capable of speech. The prevailing hypothesis for a long time was that speech spontaneously developed very recently in humans, and some argued that the hyoid could have a different usage in Neanderthals, as it is simply used in tongue movement including while chewing. It was once thought Neanderthals were anatomically unable to produce quantal vowels, which are present in all human languages, because they had a large mouth to house the tongue and lacked necessity for a descended larynx but this is not a safe assumption to make, and the modern human vocal apparatus and thus vocal repertoire were likely already present in the ancestral H. heidelbergensis.
The degree of language complexity is difficult to establish, but given Neanderthals achieved some technical and cultural complexity, and interbred with humans, it is reasonable to assume they were at least fairly articulate, comparable to humans. A somewhat complex language-possibly using syntax-was likely necessary to survive in their harsh environment, needing to communicate about topics as locations, hunting and gathering, and tool-making techniques. However, they may have lacked mental synthesis, the human imaginative ability to craft effectively infinite ideas using a finite amount of words, a hallmark of behavioural modernity which appeared by about 70 kya, though behavioural modernity is now believed to have been a process started about 400 kya, and possibly also exhibited in Neanderthals.
Genetically, the FOXP2 gene in humans is identified to be very important in speech and language development. FOXP2 is present in Neanderthals, but not the modern human variant. Neurologically, they had an expanded Broca's area-operating the formulation of sentences, and speech comprehension-but 11 out of 48 genes which encode for language brainwaves had different methylation patterns between Neanderthals and modern humans, indicating a stronger ability in modern humans to express language.
Claims that Neanderthals held funerals for their dead with symbolic meaning,:158-60 are heavily contested. Even if the burial was intentional, it is not indicative of a religious belief of life after death, as such burial could have been the result of great emotion or to prevent scavengers.
The debate on Neanderthal funerals has been active since the 1908 discovery of La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1 in a small hole in a cave in southwestern France, very controversially attributed to have been buried in a symbolic fashion.
Another grave at Shanidar Cave was associated with the pollen of several flowers which may have been in bloom at the time of deposition-yarrow, Centaurea, ragwort, grape hyacinth, joint pine, and hollyhock. The medicinal properties of the plants led American archaeologist Ralph Solecki to claim that the man buried was some leader, healer, or shaman. However, it is also possible the pollen was deposited by a small rodent after the man's death.
The grave of Teshik-Tash 1 from Uzbekistan was associated with a circle of ibex horns, which was asserted by Sir Paul Mellars to indicate a ritualistic burial. However, the abundance of ibex horns in the vicinity casts doubt on this.
The grave of a Neanderthal child from Kiik-Koba from Crimea, Ukraine had a flint flake with some purposeful engraving on it, likely requiring a great deal of skill, and possibly made with some symbolic significance.
It was once asserted that the bones of the cave bear, particularly the skull, in some European caves were arranged in a specific order, indicating an ancient bear cult which killed bears and then ceremoniously arranged the bones. This would be consistent with bear-related rituals of human Arctic hunter gatherers, but the alleged peculiarity of the arrangement could also be well-explained by natural causes, and bias could be introduced as the existence of a bear cult would conform with the idea that totemism was the earliest religion, leading to undue extrapolation of evidence.
It was also once thought Neanderthals hunted, killed, and cannabalised other Neanderthals to use the skull as the focus of some ritual. In 1962, Italian palaeontologist Alberto Blanc believed a skull from Grotta Guattari, Italy had evidence of a swift blow to the head-indicative of ritual murder-and a precise and deliberate incising at the base to access the brain. He compared it to the victims of headhunters in Malaysia and Borneo, putting it forward as evidence of a skull cult. However, it is now thought to have been a result of cave hyaena predation. Though Neanderthals are known to have practiced cannibalism, there is unsubstantial evidence to suggest ritual defleshing.
Interbreeding with modern humans
Reconstruction of the upper Paleolithic human Oase 2 with around 7.3% Neanderthal DNA (4-6 generations back)
The first Neanderthal genome sequence was published in 2010, and strongly indicated interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans. The genomes of all non-sub-Saharan-Africans contain Neanderthal DNA. Various estimates exist for the proportion: 1-4% in Eurasians, 3.4-7.9%, and 1.8-2.4% in Europeans and 2.3-2.6% in East Asians. Such low percentages indicate infrequent interbreeding. Of the inherited Neanderthal genome, 25% in Europeans and 32% in East Asians may be related to viral immunity. In all, approximately 20% of the Neanderthal genome appears to have survived in the modern human gene pool. However, due to their small population and resulting reduced effectivity of natural selection, Neanderthals mutated several weakly harmful mutations, which were introduced to and slowly selected out of the much larger human population; the initial hybridized population may have experienced up to a 94% reduction in fitness compared to contemporary humans. By this measure, Neanderthals may have substantially increased in fitness.
According to linkage disequilibrium mapping, the last Neanderthal gene flow into the modern human genome occurred 86-37 kya, but most likely 65-47 kya. However, the approximately 40 ka anatomically-modern human Oase 2 was found, in 2015, to have had 6-9% (point estimate 7.3%) Neanderthal DNA, indicating a Neanderthal ancestor up to four to six generations earlier, but this hybrid Romanian population does not appear to have made a substantial contribution to the genomes of later Europeans.
In 2016, the DNA of Altai Neanderthals showed evidence of interbreeding 100 kya, and interbreeding with a later dispersal of humans may have occurred as late as 120 kya in places such as the Levant. Palaeontologically, the earliest human remains outside of Africa occurs at Misliya Cave 194-177 kya, and Skhul and Qafzeh 120-90 kya. However, the Neanderthals of the German Hohlenstein-Stadel Cave have deeply divergent mtDNA compared to more recent Neanderthals, possibly due to introgression of human mtDNA between 316-219 kya, or simply because they were genetically isolated. Whatever the case, these first interbreeding events have not left any trace in modern human genomes.
Due to the absence of Neanderthal-derived mtDNA (which is passed on from mother to child) in modern populations, it has been suggested that the progeny of Neanderthal women who mated with modern human men were either rare, absent, or sterile-that is to say, admixture stems from the progeny of Neanderthal men with modern human women. Due to the lack of Neanderthal-derived Y-chromosomes in modern humans (which is passed on from father to son), it has also been suggested that the hybrids that contributed ancestry to modern populations were predominantly female, or the Neanderthal Y-chromosome was not compatible with humans and became extinct.
Detractors of the interbreeding model argue that the genetic similarity is only a remnant of a common ancestor instead of interbreeding. Anthropologist John D. Hawks has argued that the genetic similarity to Neanderthals may be the result of both common ancestry and interbreeding, as opposed to just one or the other.
Interbreeding with Denisovans
Chris Stringer's Homo family tree. The horizontal axis represents geographic location, and the vertical time in millions of years ago.[c]
Though nDNA confirms that Neanderthals and Denisovans are more closely related to each other than they are to humans, Neanderthals and humans share a more recent maternally-transmitted mtDNA common ancestor, possibly due to interbreeding between Denisovans and some unknown hominid. The 400 kya Neanderthal-like hominids from Sima de los Huesos in northern Spain, looking at mtDNA, are more closely related to Denisovans than Neanderthals. Several Neanderthal-like fossils in Eurasia from a similar time period are often grouped into H. heidelbergensis, of which some may be relict populations of earlier hominids, which could have interbred with Denisovans. This is also used to explain an approximately 124,000-year-old German Neanderthal specimen with mtDNA that diverged from other Neanderthals (except for Sima de los Huesos) about 270 kya, while its genomic DNA indicated divergence less than 150 kya.
Sequencing of the genome of a Denisovan from Denisova Cave has shown that 17% of its genome derives from Neanderthal. This Neanderthal DNA more closely resembled that of a 120,000-year-old Neanderthal bone from the same cave than that of Neanderthals from Vindija Cave in Croatia or Mezmaiskaya Cave in the Caucasus, suggesting that interbreeding was local.
For the 90 ky old Denisova 11, it was found that her father was a Denisovan related to more recent inhabitants of the region, and her mother a Neanderthal related to more recent European Neanderthals at Vindija Cave, Croatia. The discovery of a first generation hybrid indicates interbreeding was very common between these groups, and Neanderthal migration across Eurasia likely occurred sometime after 120 kya.
Neanderthals are thought to have died out between 41 and 39 kya.
Though some Neanderthals in Gibraltar were dated to later than this-such as Zafarraya (30 kya) and Gorham's Cave (28 kya)-prompting a hypothesis of some Iberian refuge with the Ebro River providing a geographical barrier, these dates are likely incorrect as they were based on ambiguous artefacts instead of direct dating. A claim of Neanderthals surviving in a polar refuge in the Ural Mountains is loosely supported by Mousterian stone tools dating to 34-31 kya at a time when humans may not yet have colonised the northern reaches of Europe; however, human remains are known from the northern Siberian Mamontovaya Kurya site dating to 40 kya.
Whatever the cause of their extinction, Neanderthals were replaced by humans, indicated by near full replacement of Mousterian stone technology with human Aurignacian stone technology by 38 kya in the fossil record. Modern human remains dating to 45-43 kya have been found in Italy and Britain, and this migration of humans replaced Neanderthals. A 2019 reanalysis of 210 ky old skull fragments from the Greek Apidima Cave assumed to have belonged to a Neanderthal concluded that they belonged to a human, and DNA evidence indicates human contact with Neanderthals and admixture as early as 100 kya, meaning there were multiple human immigration events into Europe. A Neanderthal skull dating to 170 kya from Apidima Cave indicates humans were replaced by Neanderthals until their return about 40 kya.
Boule was the first person to suggest modern humans forcefully took Europe from the Neanderthals. Human expansion and Neanderthal contraction are correlated, possibly due to the competitive exclusion principle with modern humans outcompeting Neanderthals. However, largely hominid-free tropical Asia was colonised by modern humans by 60 kya, meaning European colonisation was, for some reason, delayed, and, though colder climate may have influenced immigration speed, it is possible the presence of Neanderthal settlements inhibited modern human expansion for some time.
Jared Diamond in his book The Third Chimpanzee said competitive replacement often occurs in human history when a more technologically advanced culture (modern humans) meets a less advanced culture (Neanderthals). Though Neanderthals likely exhibited modern behaviour, discrediting arguments of plain human superiority, the spread of grasslands and open steppe would have made modern human projectile weapons much more effective over Neanderthal short-range spears which were adapted to a forest environment; modern humans could push into colder areas with bigger game wearing their fitted clothes, which were more effective at insulating than Neanderthal ponchos; and raw material and animal remain sourcing in the southern Caucasus suggest that modern humans were able to use extensive social networks to acquire resources from a greater area in leaner times, whereas Neanderthals likely restricted themselves to more local sources since most of their stone artefacts were drawn from within 5 km (3.1 mi),.
Anthropologist Pat Shipman suggested that domestication of the dog could have played a role in Neanderthals' extinction, or rather, a symbiosis with wolves long preceding domestication. She claims that modern humans, about 50-45 kya, evolved the whites of the eyes to allow for more effective non-verbal communications with wolves, and this gave humans an advantage over hunting. She also claims that Neanderthals did not have very prominent whites of the eyes, like the rest of the animal kingdom.:214-226
Shanidar 3 died from complications from a stab wound, likely originating from a light-weight, long-range projectile, a technology that possibly only modern humans had, which implies Neanderthal/modern human violence. However, the Lower Paleolithic Schöningen spears and Neanderthal trauma consistent with habitual throwing could indicate they were familiar with ranged weapons.
Neanderthals extinction coincided with the start of a very cold period, and their low population left them vulnerable to any environmental change, with even a small drop in survival or fertility rates possibly quickly leading to their extinction. Their ultimate extinction coincides with Heinrich event 4, a period of intense cold and dry climate, and future Heinrich events are also associated with massive cultural turnovers where European human populations collapsed. This time was also characterised by the spread of grasslands and open steppe, which Neanderthal short-range technology was unsuited for, impeding their ability to hunt. However, Neanderthals may have been familiar with long-range weapons.
Neanderthal extinction also coincides with the Campanian Ignimbrite Eruption in Italy around 40 kya, which caused a 2-4°C cooling event for a year and acid rain for several years. By that time, Neanderthal populations may have already been dwindling from other factors, and the eruption led to their final demise.
Humans may have introduced African diseases to Neanderthals which contributed to their extinction. Lacking immunity, compounded by an already low population, first contact may have been devastating to the Neanderthal population. Low genetic diversity may have also rendered fewer Neanderthals naturally immune to these new diseases.
Low population and inbreeding depression may have caused maladaptive birth defects, which could have contributed to their decline.
In New Guinea, due to cannibalistic practices, the population was decimated from transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (kuru) spread by ingestion of contaminated brains or contact with infected tools. A similar disease could have quickly spread through the small Neanderthal populations even through minimal contact with each other, given its high virulence and Neanderthal cannibalistic tendencies.
Neanderthals have been portrayed in popular culture including appearances in literature, visual media and comedy. The "caveman" archetype often mocks Neanderthals, and depicts them as primitive, hunchbacked, knuckle-dragging, club wielding, grunting, anti-social characters driven solely by animal instinct. "Neanderthal" can also be used as an insult.
^The German noun is cognate with English dale. The German /t/ phoneme was frequently spelled th throughout the 15th to 19th centuries; Tal became standardized with the German spelling reform of 1901, thus the German name Neandertal for both the valley and species.
^There are modern humans with noses as wide as those of Neanderthals and modern humans with similar nose lengths, but none with both Neanderthal nose width and nose length.
^Homo floresiensis originated in an unknown location from unknown ancestors and reached remote parts of Indonesia. Homo erectus spread from Africa to western Asia, then east Asia and Indonesia; its presence in Europe is uncertain, but it gave rise to Homo antecessor, found in Spain. Homo heidelbergensis originated from Homo erectus in an unknown location and dispersed across Africa, southern Asia and southern Europe (other scientists interpret fossils, here named heidelbergensis, as late erectus). Humans spread from Africa to western Asia and then to Europe and southern Asia, eventually reaching Australia and the Americas. In addition to Neanderthals and Denisovans, a third gene flow of archaic Africa origin is indicated at the right.
^ abcHigham, T.; Douka, K.; Wood, R.; Ramsey, C. B.; Brock, F.; Basell, L.; Camps, M.; Arrizabalaga, A.; Baena, J.; Barroso-Ruíz, C.; C. Bergman; C. Boitard; P. Boscato; M. Caparrós; N.J. Conard; C. Draily; A. Froment; B. Galván; P. Gambassini; A. Garcia-Moreno; S. Grimaldi; P. Haesaerts; B. Holt; M.-J. Iriarte-Chiapusso; A. Jelinek; J.F. Jordá Pardo; J.-M. Maíllo-Fernández; A. Marom; J. Maroto; M. Menéndez; L. Metz; E. Morin; A. Moroni; F. Negrino; E. Panagopoulou; M. Peresani; S. Pirson; M. de la Rasilla; J. Riel-Salvatore; A. Ronchitelli; D. Santamaria; P. Semal; L. Slimak; J. Soler; N. Soler; A. Villaluenga; R. Pinhasi; R. Jacobi (2014). "The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance". Nature. 512 (7514): 306-09. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..306H. doi:10.1038/nature13621. PMID25143113. We show that the Mousterian [the Neanderthal tool-making tradition] ended by 41,030-39,260 calibrated years BP (at 95.4% probability) across Europe. We also demonstrate that succeeding 'transitional' archaeological industries, one of which has been linked with Neanderthals (Châtelperronian), end at a similar time.
^ abHigham, T. (2011). "European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: problems with previous dates and some remedies". Antiquity. 85 (327): 235-49. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00067570. Few events of European prehistory are more important than the transition from ancient to modern humans about 40 kya, a period that unfortunately lies near the limit of radiocarbon dating. This paper shows that as many as 70 per cent of the oldest radiocarbon dates in the literature may be too young, due to contamination by modern carbon.
^ abcGalván, B.; Hernández, C. M.; Mallol, C.; Mercier, N.; Sistiaga, A.; Soler, V. (2014). "New evidence of early Neanderthal disappearance in the Iberian Peninsula". Journal of Human Evolution. 75: 16-27. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.002. PMID25016565.
^ abcdFinlayson, C.; Carrión, J. S. (2007). "Rapid ecological turnover and its impact on Neanderthal and other human populations". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 22 (4): 213-222. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.001. PMID17300854.
^ abLycett, S. J.; von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2013). "A 3D morphometric analysis of surface geometry in Levallois cores: patterns of stability and variability across regions and their implications". Journal of Archaeological Science. 40 (3): 1508-1517. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.005.
^ abFerentinos, G.; Gkioni, M.; Geraga, M.; Papatheodorou, G. (2012). "Early seafaring activity in the southern Ionian Islands, Mediterranean Sea". Journal of Archaeological Science. 39 (7): 2167-2176. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.032.
^ abcShipman, P. (2015). "How Humans and Their Dogs Drove Neanderthals to Extinction". The invaders : how humans and their dogs drove Neanderthals to extinction. Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-42538-5. JSTORj.ctvjf9zbs.
^ abcdHoffmann, D. L.; Standish, C. D.; García-Diez, M.; Pettitt, P. B.; Milton, J. A.; Zilhão, J.; Alcolea-González, J. J.; Cantalejo-Duarte, P.; Collado, H.; de Balbín, R.; Lorblanchet, M.; Ramos-Muñoz, J.; Weniger, G.-C.; Pike, A. W. G. (2018). "U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art". Science. 359 (6378): 912-15. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..912H. doi:10.1126/science.aap7778. PMID29472483.
^ abcdefGreen, R. E.; Krause, J.; Briggs, A. W.; Maricic, T.; Stenzel, U.; Kircher, M.; Patterson, N.; Li, H.; Zhai, W.; Fritz, M. H. Y.; Hansen, N. F.; Durand, E. Y.; Malaspinas, A. S.; Jensen, J. D.; Marques-Bonet, T.; Alkan, C.; Prüfer, K.; Meyer, M.; Burbano, H. A.; Good, J. M.; Schultz, R.; Aximu-Petri, A.; Butthof, A.; Hober, B.; Hoffner, B.; Siegemund, M.; Weihmann, A.; Nusbaum, C.; Lander, E. S.; Russ, C.; Novod, N.; Affourtit, J.; Egholm, M.; Verna, C.; Rudan, P.; Brajkovic, D.; Kucan, Z.; Gusic, I.; Doronichev, V. B.; Golovanova, L. V.; Lalueza-Fox, C.; de la Rasilla, M.; Fortea, J.; Rosas, A.; Schmitz, R. W.; Johnson, P. L. F.; Eichler, E. E.; Falush, D.; Birney, E.; Mullikin, J. C.; Slatkin, M.; Nielsen, R.; Kelso, J.; Lachmann, M.; Reich, D.; Pääbo, S. (2010). "A Draft Sequence of the Neandertal Genome". Science. 328 (5979): 710-722. Bibcode:2010Sci...328..710G. doi:10.1126/science.1188021. PMC5100745. PMID20448178.
^Murray, J.; Nasheuer, H. P.; Seoighe, C.; McCormack, G. P.; Williams, D. M.; Harper, D. A. T. (2015), "The Contribution of William King to the Early Development of Palaeoanthropology", Irish Journal of Earth Sciences, 33: 1-16, doi:10.3318/ijes.2015.33.1, JSTOR10.3318/ijes.2015.33.1
^ ab"Neandertal oder Neanderthal? Was ist denn nun richtig" [Neandertal or Neanderthal? Which is right?]. Kreisstadt Mettmann. Retrieved 2017. Heute sollten Ortsbezeichnungen das 'Neandertal' ohne 'h' bezeichnen. Alle Namen, die sich auf den prähistorischen Menschen beziehen, führen das 'h'. [Today one should write for place names 'Neandertal' without an 'h'. All names related to the prehistoric humans keep the 'h'.]
^"Neanderthal". Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Human Evolution. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 2013.
^B. Vandermeersch; M.D. Garralda (2011). "Neanderthal Geographical and Chronological Variation". In S. Condemi; G.-C. Weniger (eds.). Continuity and Discontinuity in the Peopling of Europe. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer Netherlands. pp. 113-25. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0492-3_10. ISBN978-94-007-0491-6.
^Callander, J. (2004). "Dorothy Garrod's Excavations in the Late Mousterian of Shukbah Cave in Palestine Reconsidered". Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 70: 207-231. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00001171.
^Holan, S. R.; Deméré, T. A.; Fisher, D. C.; Fullager, R.; Paces, J. B.; Jefferson, G. T. (2017). "A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA". Nature. 544 (7651): 479-483. Bibcode:2017Natur.544..479H. doi:10.1038/nature22065.
^Lalueza-Fox, C.; Sampietro, M. L.; Caramelli, D.; Puder, Y. (2013). "Neandertal evolutionary genetics: mitochondrial DNA data from the iberian peninsula". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 22 (4): 1077-1081. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi094. PMID15689531.
^Rink, W. Jack; Schwarcz, H. P.; Lee, H. K.; Rees-Jones, J.; Rabinovich, R.; Hovers, E. (2002). "Electron spin resonance (ESR) and thermal ionization mass spectrometric (TIMS) 230Th/234U dating of teeth in Middle Paleolithic layers at Amud Cave, Israel". Geoarchaeology. 16 (6): 701-717. doi:10.1002/gea.1017.
^ abcdClement, A. F.; Hillson, S. W.; Aiello, L. C. (2012). "Tooth wear, Neanderthal facial morphology and the anterior dental loading hypothesis". Journal of Human Evolution. 62 (3): 367-376. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.11.014. PMID22341317.
^O'Connor, C. F.; Franciscus, R. G.; Holton, N. E. (2005). "Bite force production capability and efficiency in Neandertals and modern humans". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 127 (2): 129-151. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20025. PMID15558614.
^Peña-Melián, A.; Rosas, A.; García-Tabernero, A.; Bastir, M.; de la Rasilla, M. (2011). "Paleoneurology of Two New Neandertal Occipitals from El Sidrón (Asturias, Spain) in the Context of Homo Endocranial Evolution". The Anatomical Record. 294 (8): 1, 370-1, 381. doi:10.1002/ar.21427. hdl:10261/123675. PMID21714107.
^Cerqueira, C. C.; Piaxão-Côrtes, V. R.; Zambra, F. M. B.; Hünemeier, T.; Bortolini, M. (2012). "Predicting homo pigmentation phenotype through genomic data: From neanderthal to James Watson". American Journal of Human Biology. 24 (5): 705-709. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22263. PMID22411106.
^Houldcroft, C. J.; Underdown, S. J. (2016). "Neanderthal genomics suggests a pleistocene time frame for the first epidemiologic transition". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 160 (3): 379-388. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22985. PMID27063929.
^Fennel, K. J.; Trinkaus, E. (1997). "Bilateral Femoral and Tibial Periostitis in the La Ferrassie 1 Neanderthal". Journal of Archaeological Science. 24 (11): 985-995. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0176.
^Rosas, A.; Estalrrich, A.; García-Vargas, S.; García-Tabernero, A.; Huguet, R.; Lalueza-Fox, C.; de la Rasilla, M. (2013). "Identification of Neandertal individuals in fragmentary fossil assemblages by means of tooth associations: The case of El Sidrón (Asturias, Spain)". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 12 (5): 279-291. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2013.06.003.
^Farizy, C. (1994). "Spatial patterning of Middle Paleolithic sites". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 13 (2): 153-160. doi:10.1006/jaar.1994.1010.
^Churchill, S. E.; Franciscus, R. G.; McKean-Peraza, H. A.; Daniel, J. A.; Warren, B. R. (2009). "Shanidar 3 Neandertal rib puncture wound and paleolithic weaponry". Journal of Human Evolution. 57 (2): 163-178. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.010. PMID19615713.
^Estalrrich, A.; Rosas, A. (2015). "Division of labor by sex and age in Neandertals: an approach through the study of activity-related dental wear". Journal of Human Evolution. 80: 51-63. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.07.007. PMID25681013.
^Bocherens, H.; Drucker, D. G.; Billiou, D.; Patou-Mathis, M.; Vandermeersch, B. (2005). "Isotopic evidence for diet and subsistence pattern of the Saint-Césaire I Neanderthal: Review and use of a multi-source mixing model". Journal of Human Evolution. 49 (1): 71-87. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.03.003. PMID15869783.
^Henry, A. G.; Brooks, A. S.; Piperno, D. R. (2011). "Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium)". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (2): 486-491. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108..486H. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016868108. PMID21187393.
^Speth, J. D.; Tchernov, E. (2002). "Middle Paleolithic Tortoise Use at Kebara Cave (Israel)". Journal of Archaeological Science. 29 (5): 471-483. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0740.
^Diedrich, C. G. (2010). "The Crocuta crocuta spelaea (Goldfuss 1823) population and its prey from the Late Pleistocene Teufelskammer Cave hyena den besides the famous Paleolithic Neandertal Cave (NRW, NW Germany)". Historical Biology. 23 (2-3): 237-270. doi:10.1080/08912963.2010.530348.
^Marquet, J.-C.; Lorblanchet, M. (2003). "A Neanderthal face? The proto-figurine from La Roche-Cotard, Langeais (Indre-et-Loire, France)". Antiquity. 77 (298): 661-670. doi:10.1017/s0003598x00061627. ISSN0003-598X.
^Boëda, Eric; Geneste, J. M.; Griggo, C.; Mercier, N.; Muhesen, S.; Reyss, J. L.; Taha, A.; Valladas, H. (2015). "A Levallois point embedded in the vertebra of a wild ass (Equus africanus): hafting, projectiles and Mousterian hunting weapons". Antiquity. 73 (280): 394-402. CiteSeerX10.1.1.453.29. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00088335.
^Roussel, M.; Soressi, M.; Hublin, J.-J. (2016). "The Châtelperronian conundrum: Blade and bladelet lithic technologies from Quinçay, France". Journal of Human Evolution. 95: 13-32. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.003. PMID27260172.
^Hublin, J.-J.; Talamo, S.; Julien, M.; David, F.; Connet, N.; Bodu, P.; Vandermeersch, B.; Richards, M. P. (2012). "Radiocarbon dates from the Grotte du Renne and Saint-Césaire support a Neandertal origin for the Châtelperronian". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 190 (46): 18743-18748. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212924109.
^Soressi, M.; McPherron, S. P.; Lenoir, M.; et al. (2013). "Neandertals made the first specialized bone tools in Europe". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (35): 14186-14190. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302730110.
^ abCollard, M.; Tarle, L.; Sandgathe, D.; Allan, A. (2016). "Faunal evidence for a difference in clothing use between Neanderthals and early modern humans in Europe". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 44: 235-246. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2016.07.010.
^Krause, J.; Lalueza-Fox, C.; Orlando, L. (2007). "The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals". Current Biology. 17 (21): 1, 908-1, 912. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008. PMID17949978.
^Dibble, H.; Aldeias, V.; Goldberg, P.; Sandgathe, D.; Steele, T. E. (2015). "A critical look at evidence from La Chapelle-aux-Saints supporting an intentional burial". Journal of Archaeological Science. 53: 649-57. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.019.
^Yotova, V.; Lefebvre, J.-F.; Moreau, C.; Gbeha, E.; Hovhannesyan, K.; Bourgeois, S.; Bédarida, S.; Azevedo, L.; Amorim, A.; Sarkisian, T.; Avogbe, P. H.; Chabi, N.; Dicko, M. H.; Kou' Santa Amouzou, E. S.; Sanni, A.; Roberts-Thomson, J.; Boettcher, B.; Scott, R. J.; Labuda, D. (2011). "An X-Linked Haplotype of Neandertal Origin is Present Among All Non-African Populations". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 28 (7): 1957-62. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr024. PMID21266489.
^Lohse, Konrad; Frantz, Laurent A. F. (2013). "Maximum likelihood evidence for Neandertal admixture in Eurasian populations from three genomes". Populations and Evolution. 1307: 8263. arXiv:1307.8263. Bibcode:2013arXiv1307.8263L.
^Lowery, Robert K.; Uribe, Gabriel; Jimenez, Eric B.; Weiss, Mark A.; Herrera, Kristian J.; Regueiro, Maria; Herrera, Rene J. (2013). "Neanderthal and Denisova genetic affinities with contemporary humans: Introgression versus common ancestral polymorphisms". Gene. 530 (1): 83-94. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.005. PMID23872234.
^Fontugne, M.; Reyss, J. L.; Ruis, C. B.; Lara, P. M. (1995). "The Mousterian site of Zafarraya (Granada, Spain): dating and implications on the palaeolithic peopling processes of Western Europe". Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. 321 (10): 931-937.
^Churchill, S. E.; Franciscus, R. G.; McKean-Peraza, H. A.; Daniel, J. A.; Warren, B. R. (2009). "Shanidar 3 Neandertal rib puncture wound and paleolithic weaponry". Journal of Human Evolution. 57 (2): 163-178. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.010. PMID19615713.