Geometric Albedo

Get Geometric Albedo essential facts below. View Videos or join the Geometric Albedo discussion. Add Geometric Albedo to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Airless bodies

## Stars

## Equivalent definitions

## Examples

## See also

## References

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Geometric Albedo

In astronomy, the **geometric albedo** of a celestial body is the ratio of its actual brightness as seen from the light source (i.e. at zero phase angle) to that of an *idealized* flat, fully reflecting, diffusively scattering (Lambertian) disk with the same cross-section. (This phase angle refers to the direction of the light paths and is not a phase angle in its normal meaning in optics or electronics.)

Diffuse scattering implies that radiation is reflected isotropically with no memory of the location of the incident light source. Zero phase angle corresponds to looking along the direction of illumination. For Earth-bound observers this occurs when the body in question is at opposition and on the ecliptic.

The **visual geometric albedo** refers to the geometric albedo quantity when accounting for only electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum.

The surface materials (regoliths) of airless bodies (in fact, the majority of bodies in the Solar System) are strongly non-Lambertian and exhibit the opposition effect, which is a strong tendency to reflect light straight back to its source, rather than scattering light diffusely.

The geometric albedo of these bodies can be difficult to determine because of this, as their reflectance is strongly peaked for a small range of phase angles near zero.^{[1]} The strength of this peak differs markedly between bodies, and can only be found by making measurements at small enough phase angles. Such measurements are usually difficult due to the necessary precise placement of the observer very close to the incident light. For example, the Moon is never seen from the Earth at exactly zero phase angle, because then it is being eclipsed. Other Solar System bodies are not in general seen at exactly zero phase angle even at opposition, unless they are also simultaneously located at the ascending or descending node of their orbit, and hence lie on the ecliptic. In practice, measurements at small nonzero phase angles are used to derive the parameters which characterize the directional reflectance properties for the body (Hapke parameters). The reflectance function described by these can then be extrapolated to zero phase angle to obtain an estimate of the geometric albedo.

For very bright, solid, airless objects such as Saturn's moons Enceladus and Tethys, whose total reflectance (Bond albedo) is close to one, a strong opposition effect combines with the high Bond albedo to give them a geometric albedo above unity (1.4 in the case of Enceladus). Light is preferentially reflected straight back to its source even at low angle of incidence such as on the limb or from a slope, whereas a Lambertian surface would scatter the radiation much more broadly. A geometric albedo above unity means that the intensity of light scattered back per unit solid angle towards the source is higher than is possible for any Lambertian surface.

Stars shine intrinsically, but they can also reflect light. In a close binary star system polarimetry can be used to measure the light reflected from one star off another (and vice versa) and therefore also the geometric albedos of the two stars. This task has been accomplished for the two components of the Spica system, with the geometric albedo of Spica A and B being measured as 0.0361 and 0.0136 respectively.^{[2]} The geometric albedos of stars are in general small, for the Sun a value of 0.001 is expected,^{[3]} but for hotter of lower gravity (i.e. giant) stars the amount of reflected light is expected to be several times that of the stars in the Spica system.^{[4]}

For the hypothetical case of a plane surface, the geometric albedo is the albedo of the surface when the illumination is provided by a beam of radiation that comes in perpendicular to the surface.

The geometric albedo may be greater or smaller than the Bond albedo, depending on surface and atmospheric properties of the body in question. Some examples:^{[5]}

Name Bond albedo Visual geometric albedo Mercury ^{[6]}^{[7]}0.088 0.142 Venus ^{[8]}^{[7]}0.76 0.689 Earth ^{[9]}^{[7]}0.306 0.434 Moon ^{[10]}^{[10]}0.11 0.12 Mars ^{[11]}^{[7]}0.25 0.17 Jupiter ^{[12]}^{[7]}0.503 0.538 Saturn ^{[13]}^{[7]}0.342 0.499 Enceladus ^{[14]}0.8 1.4 Uranus ^{[15]}^{[7]}0.300 0.488 Neptune ^{[16]}^{[7]}0.290 0.442 Pluto 0.4 0.44–0.61 Eris — 0.96

- NASA JPL glossary
- K.P. Seidelmann, Ed. (1992)
*Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac*, University Science Books, Mill Valley, California.

**^**See for example this discussion of Lunar albedo Archived April 13, 2009, at the Wayback Machine by Jeff Medkeff.**^**Bailey, Jeremy; Cotton, Daniel V; Kedziora-Chudczer, Lucyna; De Horta, Ain; Maybour, Darren (2019-04-01). "Polarized reflected light from the Spica binary system".*Nature Astronomy*.**3**(7): 636-641. arXiv:1904.01195. Bibcode:2019NatAs...3..636B. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0738-7.**^**Gilbert, Lachlan (2019-04-02). "Scientists prove that binary stars reflect light from one another".*UNSW Newsroom*. UNSW. Retrieved .**^**Bailey, Jeremy; Cotton, Daniel V; Kedziora-Chudczer, Lucyna; De Horta, Ain; Maybour, Darren (2019-04-01). "Polarized reflected light from the Spica binary system".*Nature Astronomy*.**3**(7): 636-641. arXiv:1904.01195. Bibcode:2019NatAs...3..636B. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0738-7.**^**Albedo of the Earth**^**Mallama, Anthony (2017). "The spherical bolometric albedo for planet Mercury". arXiv:1703.02670.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}^{e}^{f}^{g}^{h}Mallama, Anthony; Krobusek, Bruce; Pavlov, Hristo (2017). "Comprehensive wide-band magnitudes and albedos for the planets, with applications to exo-planets and Planet Nine".*Icarus*.**282**: 19-33. Bibcode:2017Icar..282...19M. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.09.023. **^**Haus, R.; et al. (July 2016). "Radiative energy balance of Venus based on improved models of the middle and lower atmosphere".*Icarus*.**272**: 178-205. Bibcode:2016Icar..272..178H. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.048.**^**Williams, David R. (2004-09-01). "Earth Fact Sheet". NASA. Retrieved .- ^
^{a}^{b}Williams, David R. (2014-04-25). "Moon Fact Sheet". NASA. Retrieved . **^**Mars Fact Sheet, NASA**^**Li, Liming; et al. (2018). "Less absorbed solar energy and more internal heat for Jupiter".*Nature Communications*.**9**: 3709. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3709L. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06107-2. PMC 6137063. PMID 30213944.**^**Hanel, R.A.; et al. (1983). "Albedo, internal heat flux, and energy balance of Saturn".*Icarus*.**53**: 262. Bibcode:1983Icar...53..262H. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(83)90147-1.**^**See the discussion here for explanation of this unusual value above one.**^**Pearl, J.C.; et al. (1990). "The albedo, effective temperature, and energy balance of Uranus, as determined from Voyager IRIS data".*Icarus*.**84**: 12-28. Bibcode:1990Icar...84...12P. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90155-3.**^**Pearl, J.C.; et al. (1991). "The albedo, effective temperature, and energy balance of Neptune, as determined from Voyager data".*J. Geophys. Res*.**96**: 18, 921-18, 930. Bibcode:1991JGR....9618921P. doi:10.1029/91JA01087.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists