Early Cyrillic
Get Early Cyrillic essential facts below. View Videos or join the Early Cyrillic discussion. Add Early Cyrillic to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
Early Cyrillic

Early Cyrillic alphabet
Early Cyrillic sample.svg
Early Cyrillic alphabet.svg
Type
LanguagesOld Church Slavonic, Church Slavonic, old versions of many Slavic languages
Time period
from circa 893 in Bulgaria
Parent systems
Egyptian hieroglyphs [1]
Sister systems
Latin alphabet
Coptic alphabet
Armenian alphabet
DirectionVaries
ISO 15924Cyrs, 221

The Early Cyrillic alphabet is a writing system that was developed in the First Bulgarian Empire during the late 9th century[2][3][4] on the basis of the Greek alphabet[5][6][7] for the Slavic peoples living near the Byzantine Empire in South East and Central Europe.[8] It was used by Slavic peoples in South East, Central and Eastern Europe.[8]

It was developed in the Preslav Literary School in the capital city of the First Bulgarian Empire in order to write the Old Church Slavonic language.[9][10] The modern Cyrillic script is still used primarily for some Slavic languages (such as Bulgarian, Macedonian, Serbian, Russian and Ukrainian), and for East European and Asian languages that have experienced a great amount of Russian cultural influence.

Among some of the traditionally culturally influential countries using Cyrillic script are Bulgaria, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine.

History

The Cyrillic alphabet on birch bark document No 591 from ancient Novgorod (Russia). Dated to 1025-1050 AD.
A more complete early Cyrillic abecedary (on the top half of the left side), this one written by the boy Onfim between 1240 and 1260 AD (birch bark document No 199).

The earliest form of manuscript Cyrillic, known as ustav, was based on Greek uncial script, augmented by ligatures and by letters from the Glagolitic alphabet for consonants not found in Greek.[11]

The Glagolitic alphabet was created by the monk Saint Cyril, possibly with the aid of his brother Saint Methodius, around 863.[11] Cyrillic, on the other hand, was a creation of Cyril's students in the 890s at the Preslav Literary School as a more suitable script for church books, based on uncial Greek but retaining some Glagolitic letters for sounds not present in Greek.[12] An alternative hypothesis proposes that it emerged in the border regions of Greek proselytization to the Slavs before it was codified and adapted by some systematizer among the Slavs; the oldest Cyrillic manuscripts look very similar to 9th and 10th century Greek uncial manuscripts,[11] and the majority of uncial Cyrillic letters were identical to their Greek uncial counterparts.[13] One possibility is that this systematization of Cyrillic was undertaken at the Council of Preslav in 893, when the Old Church Slavonic liturgy was adopted by the Bulgarian Empire.[13]

The Cyrillic alphabet was very well suited for the writing of Old Church Slavic, generally following a principle of "one letter for one significant sound", with some arbitrary or phonotactically-based exceptions.[11] Particularly, this principle is violated by certain vowel letters, which represent [j] plus the vowel if they are not preceded by a consonant.[11] It is also violated by a significant failure to distinguish between /ji/ and /j?/ orthographically.[11] There was no distinction of capital and lowercase letters, though manuscript letters were rendered larger for emphasis, or in various decorative initial and nameplate forms.[12] Letters served as numerals as well as phonetic signs; the values of the numerals were directly borrowed from their Greek-letter analogues.[11] Letters without Greek equivalents mostly had no numeral values, whereas one letter, koppa, had only a numeric value with no phonetic value.[11]

Since its creation, the Cyrillic script has adapted to changes in spoken language and developed regional variations to suit the features of national languages. It has been the subject of academic reforms and political decrees. Variations of the Cyrillic script are used to write languages throughout Eastern Europe and Asia.

The form of the Russian alphabet underwent a change when Tsar Peter the Great introduced the Civil Script (Russian: , romanizedgra?danskiy ?rift, or , gra?danka), in contrast to the prevailing Church Typeface, (Russian: ? , romanizedcerkovnoslavjanskiy ?rift) in 1708. Some letters and breathing marks which were used only for historical reasons were dropped. Medieval letterforms used in typesetting were harmonized with Latin typesetting practices, exchanging medieval forms for Baroque ones, and skipping the western European Renaissance developments. The reform subsequently influenced Cyrillic orthographies for most other languages. Today, the early orthography and typesetting standards remain in use only in Church Slavonic.

A comprehensive repertoire of early Cyrillic characters has been included in the Unicode standard since version 5.1, published April 4, 2008. These characters and their distinctive letterforms are represented in specialized computer fonts for Slavistics.

Alphabet

Image Unicode Name
(Cyrillic)
Name
(translit.)
Name
(IPA)
Translit. international system[11][14] Translit. ALA-LC[15] IPA Numeric value Origin Meaning of name Notes
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Azu.svg ? ? az? [az?] a a [a] 1 Greek alpha ? I
Early Cyrillic letter Buky.svg ? ? buky [buk?] b b [b] Greek beta in Thera form Greek Beta 10.svg letters
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Vedi.svg ? ? ? v?d? [vædæ] v v [v] 2 Greek beta ? know
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Glagol.svg ? ? ? glagoli [?la?oli] g g [?][11] 3 Greek gamma ? speak When marked with a palatalization mark, this letter is pronounced [?]; this occurs only rarely, and only in borrowings.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Dobro.svg ? ? dobro [dobro] d d [d] 4 Greek delta ? good
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Est.svg ? ? ? est? [j?st?] e e [?] 5 Greek epsilon ? is Pronounced [j?] (was used interchangeably with ?) when not preceded by a consonant.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Zhivete.svg ? ? ?iv?te [?ivæt?] ? zh [?] Glagolitic zhivete ? live
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Zelo.svg ? ? / ? ? ? dz?lo [dzælo] dz/? ? [dz] 6 Greek stigma ? very The form ? had the phonetic value [dz] and no numeral value, whereas the form ? was used only as a numeral and had no phonetic value.[11] Since the 12th century, ? came to be used instead of ?.[16][17] In many manuscripts ? is used instead, suggesting lenition had taken place.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Zemlia.svg ? ? / ? ? zemlja [z?m?a] z z [z] 7 Greek zeta ? earth The first form developed into the second.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Izhe.svg ? ? i?e [ji] i ?=i, ?=? [i] 8 Greek eta ? which Pronounced [ji] or [j?] when not preceded by a consonant and not the particle ("and"); the orthography does not distinguish between [ji] and [j?].[11] Speculatively, this letter might have originally been intended to represent [i] and [ji].[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Izhei.svg ? ? / ? ? ? i [i] i ? [i] 10 Greek iota ? and Pronounced [ji] or [j?] when not preceded by a consonant and not the particle ("and"); the orthography does not distinguish between [ji] and [j?].[11] Speculatively, this letter might have originally been intended to represent [j?].[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Dje.svg ? ? ? djerv [drv], [trv] ? ? [d?], [t?] Glagolitic djerv ?? Used chiefly in early Bosnian-Serbo-Croatian texts, or as a transliteration of Glagolitic ? in modern editions of Old Church Slavonic texts.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Kako.svg ? ? ? kako [kako] k k [k] 20 Greek kappa ? as When marked with a palatalization mark, this letter is pronounced [c]; this occurs only rarely, and only in borrowings.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Ludi.svg ? ? ljudije [?udij?] l l [l]; sometimes [?][11] 30 Greek lambda ? people When marked with a palatalization mark or followed by a palatalizing vowel (?, ?, or ?, and sometimes ?), this letter is pronounced [?]; some manuscripts do not mark palatalization, in which case it must be inferred from context.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Myslete.svg ? ? ? myslite [m?slit?] m m [m] 40 Greek mu ? think
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Nash.svg ? ? ? na [na] n n [n]; sometimes [?][11] 50 Greek nu ? ours When marked with a palatalization mark or followed by a palatalizing vowel (?, ?, or ?, and sometimes ?), this letter is pronounced [?]; some manuscripts do not mark palatalization, in which case it must be inferred from context.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Onu.svg ? ? on? [on?] o o [o] 70 Greek omicron ? he/it
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Pokoi.svg ? ? pokoi [pokoj?] p p [p] 80 Greek pi ? peace/calm
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Rtsi.svg ? ? ? r?ci [r?tsi] r r [r]; sometimes [r?][11] 100 Greek rho ? say When marked with a palatalization mark or followed by a palatalizing vowel (? or ?), this letter is pronounced [r?]; some manuscripts do not mark palatalization, in which case it must be inferred from context.[11] This palatalization was lost rather early in South Slavic speech.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Slovo.svg ? ? slovo [slovo] s s [s] 200 Greek lunate sigma ? word/speech
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Tverdo.svg ? ? tvr?do [tvr?do] t t [t] 300 Greek tau ? hard/surely
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Uk.svg / ? ? ? uk? [uk?] u =u, ?=? [u] 400 Greek omicron-upsilon / ? learning The first form developed into the second, a vertical ligature. A less common alternative form was a digraph with izhitsa? .
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Fert.svg ? ? fr?t? [frr?t?] f f [f] or possibly [p][11] 500 Greek phi ? This letter was not needed for Slavic but used to transcribe Greek ? and Latin ph and f.[11] It was probably, but not certainly, pronounced as [f] rather than [p]; however, in some cases it has been found as a transcription of Greek ?.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Kher.svg ? ? ? x?r? [xær?] ch/x kh [x] 600 Greek chi ? When marked with a palatalization mark, this letter is pronounced [ç]; this occurs only rarely, and only in borrowings.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Omega.svg ? ? ot? [ot?] o/v ?=?, ?=t [o] 800 Greek omega ? from This letter was rarely used, mostly appearing in the interjection "oh", in the preposition , in Greek transcription, and as a decorative capital.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Tsi.svg ? ? ci [tsi] c t?s [ts] 900 Glagolitic tsi ?
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Cherv.svg ? ? ?r?v? [t?r?v?] ? ch [t?] 90 Glagolitic cherv ? worm This letter replaced koppa as the numeral for 90 after about 1300.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Sha.svg ? ? ?a [?a] ? sh [?] Glagolitic sha ?
Early Cyrillic letter Shta.svg ? ? ?ta [?ta] ?t sht [?t] Glagolitic shta ? This letter varied in pronunciation from region to region; it may have originally represented the reflexes of [t?].[11] It was sometimes replaced by the digraph .[11] Pronounced [?t?] in Old East Slavic. Later analyzed as a ?-? ligature by folk etymology, but neither the Cyrillic nor the Glagolitic glyph originated as such a ligature.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Back-Yer.svg ? ? jer? [j?r?] ?/? ?, omit at end of a word [?] or [?][11] Glagolitic yer ?[13] After ?, ?, ?, c, dz, ?t, and ?d, this letter was pronounced identically to ? instead of its normal pronunciation.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Yery.svg ? ? jery [j?r?] y ?=?, ?=y, [?] or [?ji] or [?j?][11] ? + ? ligature. ? was the more common form; rarely, a third form, ?, appears.[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Yer.svg ? ? jer? [j?r?] ?/? ? [?] or [?][11] Glagolitic yerj ?[13]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Yat.svg ? ? ?t? [jæt?] ? ? [æ][11] Glagolitic yat ?[13] In western South Slavic dialects of Old Church Slavonic, this letter had a more closed pronunciation, perhaps [?] or [e].[11] This letter was written only after a consonant; in all other positions, ? was used instead.[11] An exceptional document is Pages of Undolski, where ? is used instead of ?.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Iotated-A.svg ? ? ? ja [ja] ja i?a [ja] ?-? ligature This letter was probably not present in the original Cyrillic alphabet.[13]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Iotated-E.svg ? ? ? je [j?] je i?e [j?] ?-? ligature This letter was probably not present in the original Cyrillic alphabet.[13]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Yu.svg ? ? ? ju [ju] ju i?u [ju] ?- ligature, dropping ? There was no [jo] sound in early Slavic, so ?- did not need to be distinguished from ?-?. After ?, ?, ?, c, dz, ?t, and ?d, this letter was pronounced [u], without iotation.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Big-Yus.svg ? ? ?s? [s?] ? ? [] Glagolitic ons ? Called ? (big yus) in Russian.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Iotated-Big-Yus.svg ? ? j?s? [js?] j? i [j] ?-? ligature After ?, ?, ?, c, dz, ?t, and ?d, this letter was pronounced [], without iotation. Called ? (iotated big yus) in Russian.
Early Cyrillic letter Yusu Maliy.svg ? ? ?s? [js?] ? ? [] 900 Glagolitic ens ? Pronounced [j] when not preceded by a consonant.[11] Called (little yus) in Russian.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Iotated-Lesser-Yus.svg ? ? j?s? [js?] j? i [j] ?-? ligature This letter does not exist in the oldest (South Slavic) Cyrillic manuscripts, but only in East Slavic ones.[11] It was probably not present in the original Cyrillic alphabet.[13] Called (iotated little yus) in Russian.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Ksi.svg ? ? ksi [ksi] ks k?s [ks] 60 Greek xi ? These two letters were not needed for Slavic but were used to transcribe Greek and as numerals.
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Psi.svg ? ? psi [psi] ps p?s [ps] 700 Greek psi ?
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Fita.svg ? ? ? fita [fita] t/f/th ? [t], or possibly [?] 9 Greek theta ? This letter was not needed for Slavic but was used to transcribe Greek and as a numeral. It seems to have been generally pronounced [t], as the oldest texts sometimes replace instances of it with ?.[11] Normal Old Church Slavonic pronunciation probably did not have a phone [?].[11]
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Izhitsa.svg ? ? i?ica [ji?itsa] i,ü ?=?, ?=v? [i], [y], [v] 400 Greek upsilon ? small yoke This letter was used to transcribe Greek upsilon and as a numeral. It also formed part of the digraph .
Early-Cyrillic-letter-Koppa.svg ? ? ? kopa [kopa] q no sound value 90 Greek koppa ? This letter had no phonetic value, and was used only as a numeral. After about 1300, it was replaced as a numeral by ?r?v?.[11]

In addition to the basic letters, there were a number of scribal variations, combining ligatures, and regionalisms used, all of which varied over time.

Sometimes the Greek letters that were used in Cyrillic mainly for their numeric value are transcribed with the corresponding Greek letters for accuracy: ? = ?, ? = ?, ? = ?, ? = ?, and ? = ?.[14]

Numerals, diacritics and punctuation

Each letter had a numeric value also, inherited from the corresponding Greek letter. A titlo over a sequence of letters indicated their use as a number; usually this was accompanied by a dot on either side of the letter.[11] In numerals, the ones place was to the left of the tens place, the reverse of the order used in modern Arabic numerals.[11] Thousands are formed using a special symbol, ? (U+0482), which was attached to the lower left corner of the numeral.[11] Many fonts display this symbol incorrectly as being in line with the letters instead of subscripted below and to the left of them.

Titlos were also used to form abbreviations, especially of nomina sacra; this was done by writing the first and last letter of the abbreviated word along with the word's grammatical endings, then placing a titlo above it.[11] Later manuscripts made increasing use of a different style of abbreviation, in which some of the left-out letters were superscripted above the abbreviation and covered with a pokrytie diacritic.[11]

Several diacritics, adopted from Polytonic Greek orthography, were also used, but were seemingly redundant[11] (these may not appear correctly in all web browsers; they are supposed to be directly above the letter, not off to its upper right):

  trema, diaeresis (U+0308)
  varia (grave accent), indicating stress on the last syllable (U+0300)
  oksia (acute accent), indicating a stressed syllable (Unicode U+0301)
  titlo, indicating abbreviations, or letters used as numerals (U+0483)
  kamora (circumflex accent), indicating palatalization[] (U+0484); in later Church Slavonic, it disambiguates plurals from homophonous singulars.
  dasia or dasy pneuma, rough breathing mark (U+0485)
  psili, zvatel'tse, or psilon pneuma, soft breathing mark (U+0486). Signals a word-initial vowel, at least in later Church Slavonic.
  Combined zvatel'tse and varia is called apostrof.
  Combined zvatel'tse and oksia is called iso.

Punctuation systems in early Cyrillic manuscripts were primitive: there was no space between words and no upper and lower case, and punctuation marks were used inconsistently in all manuscripts.[11]

·  ano teleia (U+0387), a middle dot used to separate phrases, words, or parts of words[11]
.  Full stop, used in the same way[11]
?  Armenian full stop (U+0589), resembling a colon, used in the same way[11]
?  Georgian paragraph separator (U+10FB), used to mark off larger divisions
?  triangular colon (U+2056, added in Unicode 4.1), used to mark off larger divisions
?  diamond colon (U+2058, added in Unicode 4.1), used to mark off larger divisions
?  quintuple colon (U+2059, added in Unicode 4.1), used to mark off larger divisions
;  Greek question mark (U+037E), similar to a semicolon

Some of these marks are also used in Glagolitic script.

Used only in modern texts

,  comma (U+002C)
.  full stop (U+002E)
!  exclamation mark (U+0021)

Gallery

Old Bulgarian examples

Medieval Greek Uncial manuscripts from which early Cyrillic letter forms take their shapes

Early Cyrillic manuscripts

See also

Media related to early Cyrillic alphabet at Wikimedia Commons

References

  1. ^ Himelfarb, Elizabeth J. "First Alphabet Found in Egypt", Archaeology 53, Issue 1 (Jan./Feb. 2000): 21.
  2. ^ Dvornik, Francis (1956). The Slavs: Their Early History and Civilization. Boston: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. p. 179. The Psalter and the Book of Prophets were adapted or "modernized" with special regard to their use in Bulgarian churches, and it was in this school that glagolitic writing was replaced by the so-called Cyrillic writing, which was more akin to the Greek uncial, simplified matters considerably and is still used by the Orthodox Slavs.
  3. ^ Florin Curta (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250. Cambridge Medieval Textbooks. Cambridge University Press. pp. 221-222. ISBN 978-0-521-81539-0. Cyrillic preslav.
  4. ^ J. M. Hussey, Andrew Louth (2010). "The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire". Oxford History of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-19-161488-0.
  5. ^ Mauricio Borrero, "Russia", p. 123
  6. ^ World Cultures Through Art Activities, Dindy Robinson, p. 115
  7. ^ Handbook of Scripts and Alphabets, George L. Campbell, p. 42
  8. ^ a b "Cyrillic alphabet". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2012. Web. 16 May. 2012
  9. ^ The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire, Oxford History of the Christian Church, J. M. Hussey, Andrew Louth, Oxford University Press, 2010, ISBN 0191614882, p. 100.
  10. ^ Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250, Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, Florin Curta, Cambridge University Press, 2006, ISBN 0521815398, pp. 221-222.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf Lunt, Horace Gray (2001). Old Church Slavonic Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-016284-9.
  12. ^ a b Cubberley 1994
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h Auty, R. Handbook of Old Church Slavonic, Part II: Texts and Glossary. 1977.
  14. ^ a b Matthews, W. K. (1952). "The Latinisation of Cyrillic Characters". The Slavonic and East European Review. 30 (75): 531-548. ISSN 0037-6795.
  15. ^ "Church Slavic (ALA-LC Romanization Tables)" (PDF). The Library of Congress. 2011. Retrieved 2020.
  16. ^ ? / ?. ?. ?. -- .  ? , 1904. -- ?. I, ?. 14. -- ?
  17. ^ http://www.ruslang.ru/doc/lingistoch/1964/02-simonov.pdf

Sources

External links


  This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Early_Cyrillic
 



 



 
Music Scenes