Differentiability Class

Get Differentiability Class essential facts below. View Videos or join the Differentiability Class discussion. Add Differentiability Class to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.
## Differentiability classes

### Examples

### Multivariate differentiability classes

### The space of *C*^{k} functions

## Parametric continuity

### Definition

### Order of continuity

## Geometric continuity

### Smoothness of curves and surfaces

### Smoothness of piecewise defined curves and surfaces

## Other concepts

### Relation to analyticity

### Smooth partitions of unity

### Smooth functions on and between manifolds

### Smooth functions between subsets of manifolds

## See also

## References

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Differentiability Class

In mathematical analysis, the **smoothness** of a function is a property measured by the number of continuous derivatives it has over some domain.^{[1]}^{[2]} At the very minimum, a function could be considered "smooth" if it is differentiable everywhere (hence continuous).^{[3]} At the other end, it might also possess derivatives of all orders in its domain, in which case it is said **infinitely differentiable** and referred to as a **C-infinity function** (or function).^{[4]}

**Differentiability class** is a classification of functions according to the properties of their derivatives. It is a measure of the highest order of derivative that exists for a function.

Consider an open set on the real line and a function *f* defined on that set with real values. Let *k* be a non-negative integer. The function *f* is said to be of (differentiability) **class C^{k}** if the derivatives

To put it differently, the class *C*^{0} consists of all continuous functions. The class *C*^{1} consists of all differentiable functions whose derivative is continuous; such functions are called **continuously differentiable**. Thus, a *C*^{1} function is exactly a function whose derivative exists and is of class *C*^{0}. In general, the classes *C ^{k}* can be defined recursively by declaring

The function

is continuous, but not differentiable at , so it is of class *C*^{0}, but not of class *C*^{1}.

The function

is differentiable, with derivative

Because oscillates as x -> 0, is not continuous at zero. Therefore, is differentiable but not of class *C*^{1}. Moreover, if one takes in this example, it can be used to show that the derivative function of a differentiable function can be unbounded on a compact set and, therefore, that a differentiable function on a compact set may not be locally Lipschitz continuous.

The functions

where k is even, are continuous and k times differentiable at all x. But at they are not times differentiable, so they are of class *C*^{k}, but not of class *C*^{j} where .

The exponential function is analytic, and hence falls into the class *C*^{?}. The trigonometric functions are also analytic wherever they are defined.

The bump function

is smooth, so of class *C*^{?}, but it is not analytic at , and hence is not of class *C*^{?}. The function f is an example of a smooth function with compact support.

A function defined on an open set of is said^{[6]} to be of class on , for a positive integer , if all partial derivatives

exist and are continuous, for every non-negative integers, such that , and every . The function is said to be of class or if it is continuous on .

A function , defined on an open set of , is said to be of class on , for a positive integer , if all of its components

are of class , where are the natural projections defined by . It is said to be of class or if it is continuous, or equivalently, if all components are continuous, on .

Let *D* be an open subset of the real line. The set of all *C ^{k}* real-valued functions defined on

where *K* varies over an increasing sequence of compact sets whose union is *D*, and *m* = 0, 1, ..., *k*.

The set of *C*^{?} functions over *D* also forms a Fréchet space. One uses the same seminorms as above, except that *m* is allowed to range over all non-negative integer values.

The above spaces occur naturally in applications where functions having derivatives of certain orders are necessary; however, particularly in the study of partial differential equations, it can sometimes be more fruitful to work instead with the Sobolev spaces.

The terms *parametric continuity* and *geometric continuity* (*G ^{n}*) were introduced by Brian Barsky, to show that the smoothness of a curve could be measured by removing restrictions on the speed, with which the parameter traces out the curve.

**Parametric continuity** is a concept applied to parametric curves, which describes the smoothness of the parameter's value with distance along the curve.

A (parametric) curve is said to be of class *C*^{k}, if exists and is continuous on , where derivatives at the end-points are taken to be one sided derivatives (i.e., at from the right, and at from the left).

As a practical application of this concept, a curve describing the motion of an object with a parameter of time must have *C*^{1} continuity--for the object to have finite acceleration. For smoother motion, such as that of a camera's path while making a film, higher orders of parametric continuity are required.

The various order of parametric continuity can be described as follows:^{[10]}

*C*^{0}: Curves are continuous*C*^{1}: First derivatives are continuous*C*^{2}: First and second derivatives are continuous*C*: First through^{n}*n*th derivatives are continuous

The concept of **geometrical** or **geometric continuity** was primarily applied to the conic sections (and related shapes) by mathematicians such as Leibniz, Kepler, and Poncelet. The concept was an early attempt at describing, through geometry rather than algebra, the concept of continuity as expressed through a parametric function.^{[11]}

The basic idea behind geometric continuity was that the five conic sections were really five different versions of the same shape. An ellipse tends to a circle as the eccentricity approaches zero, or to a parabola as it approaches one; and a hyperbola tends to a parabola as the eccentricity drops toward one; it can also tend to intersecting lines. Thus, there was *continuity* between the conic sections. These ideas led to other concepts of continuity. For instance, if a circle and a straight line were two expressions of the same shape, perhaps a line could be thought of as a circle of infinite radius. For such to be the case, one would have to make the line closed by allowing the point to be a point on the circle, and for and to be identical. Such ideas were useful in crafting the modern, algebraically defined, idea of the continuity of a function and of (see projectively extended real line for more).^{[11]}

A curve or surface can be described as having *G ^{n}* continuity, with

*G*^{0}: The curves touch at the join point.*G*^{1}: The curves also share a common tangent direction at the join point.*G*^{2}: The curves also share a common center of curvature at the join point.

In general, *G ^{n}* continuity exists if the curves can be reparameterized to have

Equivalently, two vector functions *f*(*t*) and *g*(*t*) have *G ^{n}* continuity if and , for a scalar (i.e., if the direction, but not necessarily the magnitude, of the two vectors is equal).

While it may be obvious that a curve would require *G*^{1} continuity to appear smooth, for good aesthetics, such as those aspired to in architecture and sports car design, higher levels of geometric continuity are required. For example, reflections in a car body will not appear smooth unless the body has *G*^{2} continuity.

A *rounded rectangle* (with ninety degree circular arcs at the four corners) has *G*^{1} continuity, but does not have *G*^{2} continuity. The same is true for a *rounded cube*, with octants of a sphere at its corners and quarter-cylinders along its edges. If an editable curve with *G*^{2} continuity is required, then cubic splines are typically chosen; these curves are frequently used in industrial design.

This section needs expansion with: Linkage Curve Theorem. You can help by adding to it. (August 2014) |

While all analytic functions are "smooth" (i.e. have all derivatives continuous) on the set on which they are analytic, examples such as bump functions (mentioned above) show that the converse is not true for functions on the reals: there exist smooth real functions that are not analytic. Simple examples of functions that are smooth but not analytic at any point can be made by means of Fourier series; another example is the Fabius function. Although it might seem that such functions are the exception rather than the rule, it turns out that the analytic functions are scattered very thinly among the smooth ones; more rigorously, the analytic functions form a meagre subset of the smooth functions. Furthermore, for every open subset *A* of the real line, there exist smooth functions that are analytic on *A* and nowhere else.

It is useful to compare the situation to that of the ubiquity of transcendental numbers on the real line. Both on the real line and the set of smooth functions, the examples we come up with at first thought (algebraic/rational numbers and analytic functions) are far better behaved than the majority of cases: the transcendental numbers and nowhere analytic functions have full measure (their complements are meagre).

The situation thus described is in marked contrast to complex differentiable functions. If a complex function is differentiable just once on an open set, it is both infinitely differentiable and analytic on that set.

Smooth functions with given closed support are used in the construction of **smooth partitions of unity** (see *partition of unity* and topology glossary); these are essential in the study of smooth manifolds, for example to show that Riemannian metrics can be defined globally starting from their local existence. A simple case is that of a **bump function** on the real line, that is, a smooth function *f* that takes the value 0 outside an interval [*a*,*b*] and such that

Given a number of overlapping intervals on the line, bump functions can be constructed on each of them, and on semi-infinite intervals and to cover the whole line, such that the sum of the functions is always 1.

From what has just been said, partitions of unity don't apply to holomorphic functions; their different behavior relative to existence and analytic continuation is one of the roots of sheaf theory. In contrast, sheaves of smooth functions tend not to carry much topological information.

Given a smooth manifold , dimension *m*, with atlas , then a map is **smooth** on *M* if for all there exists a chart , such that the pullback of by , denoted is smooth as a function from to in a neighborhood of (all partial derivatives up to a given order are continuous). Note that smoothness can be checked with respect to any preferred chart about *p* in the atlas, since the smoothness requirements on the transition functions between charts ensure that if is smooth about p in one chart it will be smooth about *p* in any other chart of the atlas. If instead is a map from * to an **n*-dimensional manifold *, then **F* is smooth if, for every , there is a chart about *p* in *,* and a chart about in * with , such that is smooth as a function from ***R**^{m} to **R**^{n}.

Smooth maps between manifolds induce linear maps between tangent spaces: for , at each point the pushforward (or differential) maps tangent vectors at *p* to tangent vectors at *F(p)*: , and on the level of the tangent bundle, the pushforward is a vector bundle homomorphism: . The dual to the pushforward is the pullback, which "pulls" covectors on * back to covectors on **, and **k*-forms to *k-*forms: . In this way smooth functions between manifolds can transport local data, like vector fields and differential forms, from one manifold to another, or down to Euclidean space where computations like integration are well understood.

Preimages and pushforwards along smooth functions are, in general, not manifolds without additional assumptions. Preimages of regular points (that is, if the differential does not vanish on the preimage) are manifolds; this is the preimage theorem. Similarly, pushforwards along embeddings are manifolds.^{[14]}

There is a corresponding notion of **smooth map** for arbitrary subsets of manifolds. If is a function whose domain and range are subsets of manifolds and respectively. *f* is said to be **smooth** if for all there is an open set with and a smooth function such that for all .

- Non-analytic smooth function
- Quasi-analytic function
- Singularity (mathematics)
- Sinuosity
- Smooth scheme
- Smooth number (number theory)
- Smoothing
- Spline

**^**"The Definitive Glossary of Higher Mathematical Jargon -- Smooth".*Math Vault*. 2019-08-01. Retrieved .**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Smooth Function".*mathworld.wolfram.com*. Retrieved .**^**"Smooth (mathematics)".*TheFreeDictionary.com*. Retrieved .**^**"Smooth function - Encyclopedia of Mathematics".*www.encyclopediaofmath.org*. Retrieved .**^**Warner, Frank W. (1983).*Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups*. Springer. p. 5 [Definition 1.2]. ISBN 978-0-387-90894-6.**^**Henri Cartan (1977).*Cours de calcul différentiel*. Paris: Hermann.**^**Barsky, Brian A. (1981).*The Beta-spline: A Local Representation Based on Shape Parameters and Fundamental Geometric Measures*(Ph.D.). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.**^**Brian A. Barsky (1988).*Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling Using Beta-splines*. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-72294-3.**^**Richard H. Bartels; John C. Beatty; Brian A. Barsky (1987).*An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling*. Morgan Kaufmann. Chapter 13. Parametric vs. Geometric Continuity. ISBN 978-1-55860-400-1.**^**van de Panne, Michiel (1996). "Parametric Curves".*Fall 1996 Online Notes*. University of Toronto, Canada.- ^
^{a}^{b}Taylor, Charles (1911).*Encyclopædia Britannica*.**11**(11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 674-675. . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). **^**Barsky, Brian A.; DeRose, Tony D. (1989). "Geometric Continuity of Parametric Curves: Three Equivalent Characterizations".*IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications*.**9**(6): 60-68. doi:10.1109/38.41470. S2CID 17893586.**^**Hartmann, Erich (2003). "Geometry and Algorithms for Computer Aided Design" (PDF). Technische Universität Darmstadt. p. 55.**^**Guillemin, Victor; Pollack, Alan (1974).*Differential Topology*. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-212605-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists