Conservative Vector Field

Get Conservative Vector Field essential facts below. View Videos or join the Conservative Vector Field discussion. Add Conservative Vector Field to your PopFlock.com topic list for future reference or share this resource on social media.

## Informal treatment

## Intuitive explanation

## Definition

## Path independence

## Irrotational vector fields

## Irrotational fields

## Conservative forces

## See also

## References

## Further reading

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Conservative Vector Field

This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (May 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In vector calculus, a **conservative vector field** is a vector field that is the gradient of some function.^{[1]} Conservative vector fields have the property that the line integral is path independent; the choice of any path between two points does not change the value of the line integral. Path independence of the line integral is equivalent to the vector field being conservative. A conservative vector field is also irrotational; in three dimensions, this means that it has vanishing curl. An irrotational vector field is necessarily conservative provided that the domain is simply connected.

Conservative vector fields appear naturally in mechanics: They are vector fields representing forces of physical systems in which energy is conserved.^{[2]} For a conservative system, the work done in moving along a path in configuration space depends only on the endpoints of the path, so it is possible to define a potential energy that is independent of the actual path taken.

In a two- and three-dimensional space, there is an ambiguity in taking an integral between two points as there are infinitely many paths between the two points--apart from the straight line formed between the two points, one could choose a curved path of greater length as shown in the figure. Therefore, in general, the value of the integral depends on the path taken. However, in the special case of a conservative vector field, the value of the integral is independent of the path taken, which can be thought of as a large-scale cancellation of all elements that don't have a component along the straight line between the two points. To visualize this, imagine two people climbing a cliff; one decides to scale the cliff by going vertically up it, and the second decides to walk along a winding path that is longer in length than the height of the cliff, but at only a small angle to the horizontal. Although the two hikers have taken different routes to get up to the top of the cliff, at the top, they will have both gained the same amount of gravitational potential energy. This is because a gravitational field is conservative. As an example of a non-conservative field, imagine pushing a box from one end of a room to another. Pushing the box in a straight line across the room requires noticeably less work against friction than along a curved path covering a greater distance.

M. C. Escher's painting *Ascending and Descending* illustrates a non-conservative vector field, impossibly made to appear to be the gradient of the varying height above ground as one moves along the staircase. It is *rotational* in that one can keep getting higher or keep getting lower while going around in circles. It is non-conservative in that one can return to one's starting point while ascending more than one descends or vice versa. On a real staircase, the height above the ground is a scalar potential field: If one returns to the same place, one goes upward exactly as much as one goes downward. Its gradient would be a conservative vector field and is irrotational. The situation depicted in the painting is impossible.

A vector field , where is an open subset of , is said to be **conservative** if and only if there exists a scalar field on such that

Here, denotes the gradient of . When the equation above holds, is called a **scalar potential** for .

The fundamental theorem of vector calculus states that any vector field can be expressed as the sum of a conservative vector field and a solenoidal field.

A key property of a conservative vector field is that its integral along a path depends only on the endpoints of that path, not the particular route taken. Suppose that is a rectifiable path in with initial point and terminal point . If for some scalar field so that is a conservative vector field, then the gradient theorem states that

This holds as a consequence of the chain rule and the fundamental theorem of calculus.

An equivalent formulation of this is that

for every rectifiable simple closed path in . The converse of this statement is also true: If the circulation of around every rectifiable simple closed path in is , then is a conservative vector field.

Let , and let be a vector field, with open as always. Then is called **irrotational** if and only if its curl is everywhere in , i.e., if

For this reason, such vector fields are sometimes referred to as **curl-free vector fields** or **curl-less vector fields**. They are also referred to as **longitudinal vector fields**.

It is an identity of vector calculus that for any scalar field on , we have

Therefore, every conservative vector field on is also an irrotational vector field on .

Provided that is simply connected, the converse of this is also true: Every irrotational vector field on is a conservative vector field on .

The above statement is *not* true in general if is not simply connected. Let be with the -axis removed, i.e., . Now, define a vector field on by

Then has zero curl everywhere in , i.e., is irrotational. However, the circulation of around the unit circle in the -plane is . Indeed, note that in polar coordinates, , so the integral over the unit circle is

Therefore, does not have the path-independence property discussed above and is not conservative. (However, in any simply connected open sub-region of , it is still true that is conservative. In fact, the field above is the gradient of . As we know from complex analysis, this is a multi-valued function that requires a branch cut from the origin to to be defined in a continuous manner. Hence, in a region that does not go around the -axis, its gradient is conservative.)

In a simply connected open region, an irrotational vector field has the path-independence property. This can be seen by noting that in such a region, an irrotational vector field is conservative, and conservative vector fields have the path-independence property. The result can also be proved directly by using Stokes' theorem. In a simply connected open region, any vector field that has the path-independence property must also be irrotational.

More abstractly, in the presence of a Riemannian metric, vector fields correspond to differential -forms. The conservative vector fields correspond to the exact -forms, that is, to the forms which are the exterior derivative of a function (scalar field) on . The irrotational vector fields correspond to the closed -forms, that is, to the -forms such that . As , any exact form is closed, so any conservative vector field is irrotational. Conversely, all closed -forms are exact if and only if is simply connected. To see why, note that being simply connected means that the fundamental group of vanishes. Because is an open subset of , any loop may be straightened to a finite polygonal path, and since such paths have only finitely many self-intersections, the loop is a union of finitely many simple closed curves. It follows that the fundamental group vanishes if and only if the first singular homology group vanishes. It also follows that is generated by the classes of simple closed curves and is therefore torsion-free. Hence by the universal coefficient theorem, the singular homology group vanishes if and only if the singular cohomology group vanishes. By de Rham's theorem, the latter group is isomorphic to the first de Rham cohomology group . Consequently, is simply connected if and only if all closed -forms are exact.

The **vorticity** of a vector field can be defined by:

If is irrotational, with , then the field is said to be an **irrotational field**. The vorticity of an irrotational field is zero everywhere.^{[3]}

Kelvin's circulation theorem states that a fluid that is irrotational in an inviscid flow will remain irrotational. This result can be derived from the vorticity transport equation, obtained by taking the curl of the Navier-Stokes Equations.

For a two-dimensional field, the vorticity acts as a measure of the *local* rotation of fluid elements. Note that the vorticity does *not* imply anything about the global behavior of a fluid. It is possible for a fluid traveling in a straight line to have vorticity, and it is possible for a fluid that moves in a circle to be irrotational.

If the vector field associated to a force is conservative, then the force is said to be a conservative force.

The most prominent examples of conservative forces are the gravitational force and the electric force associated to an electrostatic field. According to Newton's law of gravitation, the gravitational force acting on a mass due to a mass , which is a distance between them, obeys the equation

where is the gravitational constant and is a *unit* vector pointing from toward . The force of gravity is conservative because , where

is the gravitational potential energy. It can be shown that any vector field of the form is conservative, provided that is integrable.

For conservative forces, *path independence* can be interpreted to mean that the work done in going from a point to a point is independent of the path chosen, and that the work done in going around a simple closed loop is :

The total energy of a particle moving under the influence of conservative forces is conserved, in the sense that a loss of potential energy is converted to an equal quantity of kinetic energy, or vice versa.

- Beltrami vector field
- Conservative force
- Complex lamellar vector field
- Helmholtz decomposition
- Laplacian vector field
- Longitudinal and transverse vector fields
- Solenoidal vector field

**^**Marsden, Jerrold; Tromba, Anthony (2003).*Vector calculus*(Fifth ed.). W.H.Freedman and Company. pp. 550-561.**^**George B. Arfken and Hans J. Weber,*Mathematical Methods for Physicists*, 6th edition, Elsevier Academic Press (2005)**^**Liepmann, H.W.; Roshko, A. (1993) [1957],*Elements of Gas Dynamics*, Courier Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-41963-0, pp. 194-196.

- Acheson, D. J. (1990).
*Elementary Fluid Dynamics*. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198596790.

This article uses material from the Wikipedia page available here. It is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Popular Products

Music Scenes

Popular Artists