In mathematics, an associative algebra is an algebraic structure with compatible operations of addition, multiplication (assumed to be associative), and a scalar multiplication by elements in some field. The addition and multiplication operations together give A the structure of a ring; the addition and scalar multiplication operations together give A the structure of a vector space over K. In this article we will also use the term K-algebra to mean an associative algebra over the field K. A standard first example of a K-algebra is a ring of square matrices over a field K, with the usual matrix multiplication.
In this article associative algebras are assumed to have a multiplicative identity, denoted 1; they are sometimes called unital associative algebras for clarification. In some areas of mathematics this assumption is not made, and we will call such structures non-unital associative algebras. We will also assume that all rings are unital, and all ring homomorphisms are unital.
Many authors consider the more general concept of an associative algebra over a commutative ring R, instead of a field: An R-algebra is an R-module with an associative R-bilinear binary operation, which also contains a multiplicative identity. For examples of this concept, if S is any ring with center C, then S is an associative C-algebra.
Let R be a fixed commutative ring (so R could be a field). An associative R-algebra (or more simply, an R-algebra) is an additive abelian group A which has the structure of both a ring and an R-module in such a way that the scalar multiplication satisfies
for all r ? R and x, y ? A. Furthermore, A is assumed to be unital, which is to say it contains an element 1 such that
for all x ? A. Note that such an element 1 is necessarily unique.
In other words, A is an R-module together with a R-bilinear binary operation A × A -> A that is associative, and has an identity.  If one drops the requirement for the associativity, then one obtains a non-associative algebra.
If A itself is commutative (as a ring) then it is called a commutative R-algebra.
The definition is equivalent to saying that a unital associative R-algebra is a monoid object in R-Mod (the monoidal category of R-modules). By definition, a ring is a monoid object in the category of abelian groups; thus, the notion of an associative algebra is obtained by replacing the category of abelian groups with the category of modules.
Pushing this idea further, some authors have introduced a "generalized ring" as a monoid object in some other category that behaves like the category of modules. Indeed, this reinterpretation allows one to avoid making an explicit reference to elements of an algebra A. For example, the associativity can be expressed as follows. By the universal property of a tensor product of modules, the multiplication (the R-bilinear map) corresponds to a unique R-linear map
The associativity then refers to the identity:
An associative algebra amounts to a ring homomorphism whose image lies in the center. Indeed, starting with a ring A and a ring homomorphism whose image lies in the center of A, we can make A an R-algebra by defining
for all r ? R and x ? A. If A is an R-algebra, taking x = 1, the same formula in turn defines a ring homomorphism whose image lies in the center.
If a ring is commutative then it equals its center, so that a commutative R-algebra can be defined simply as a commutative ring A together with a commutative ring homomorphism .
The ring homomorphism ? appearing in the above is often called a structure map. In the commutative case, one can consider the category whose objects are ring homomorphisms R -> A; i.e., commutative R-algebras and whose morphisms are ring homomorphisms A -> A that are under R; i.e., R -> A -> A is R -> A (i.e., the coslice category of the category of commutative rings under R.) The prime spectrum functor Spec then determines an anti-equivalence of this category to the category of affine schemes over Spec R.
The class of all R-algebras together with algebra homomorphisms between them form a category, sometimes denoted R-Alg.
The most basic example is a ring itself; it is an algebra over its center or any subring lying in the center. In particular, any commutative ring is an algebra over any of its subrings. Other examples abound both from algebra and other fields of mathematics.
Let A be an algebra over a commutative ring R. Then the algebra A is a right module over with the action . Then, by definition, A is said to separable if the multiplication map splits as an -linear map, where is an -module by . Equivalently, is separable if it is a projective module over ; thus, the -projective dimension of A, sometimes called the bidimension of A, measures the failure of separability.
Let A be a finite-dimensional algebra over a field k. Then A is an Artinian ring.
As A is Artinian, if it is commutative, then it is a finite product of Artinian local rings whose residue fields are algebras over the base field k. Now, a reduced Artinian local ring is a field and thus the following are equivalent
Since a simple Artinian ring is a (full) matrix ring over a division ring, if A is a simple algebra, then A is a (full) matrix algebra over a division algebra D over k; i.e., . More generally, if A is a semisimple algebra, then it is a finite product of matrix algebras (over various division k-algebras), the fact known as the Artin-Wedderburn theorem.
The fact that A is Artinian simplifies the notion of a Jacobson radical; for an Artinian ring, the Jacobson radical of A is the intersection of all (two-sided) maximal ideals (in contrast, in general, a Jacobson radical is the intersection of all left maximal ideals or the intersection of all right maximal ideals.)
The Wedderburn principal theorem states: for a finite-dimensional algebra A with a nilpotent ideal I, if the projective dimension of as an -module is at most one, then the natural surjection splits; i.e., contains a subalgebra such that is an isomorphism. Taking I to be the Jacobson radical, the theorem says in particular that the Jacobson radical is complemented by a semisimple algebra. The theorem is an analog of Levi's theorem for Lie algebras.
Let R be a Noetherian integral domain with field of fractions K (for example, they can be ). A lattice L in a finite-dimensional K-vector space V is a finitely generated R-submodule of V that spans V; in other words, .
Let be a finite-dimensional K-algebra. An order in is an R-subalgebra that is a lattice. In general, there are a lot fewer orders than lattices; e.g., is a lattice in but not an order (since it is not an algebra).
A maximal order is an order that is maximal among all the orders.
An associative algebra over K is given by a K-vector space A endowed with a bilinear map A × A -> A having two inputs (multiplicator and multiplicand) and one output (product), as well as a morphism K -> A identifying the scalar multiples of the multiplicative identity. If the bilinear map A × A -> A is reinterpreted as a linear map (i. e., morphism in the category of K-vector spaces) A ⊗ A -> A (by the universal property of the tensor product), then we can view an associative algebra over K as a K-vector space A endowed with two morphisms (one of the form A ⊗ A -> A and one of the form K -> A) satisfying certain conditions that boil down to the algebra axioms. These two morphisms can be dualized using categorial duality by reversing all arrows in the commutative diagrams that describe the algebra axioms; this defines the structure of a coalgebra.
A representation of an algebra A is an algebra homomorphism ? : A -> End(V) from A to the endomorphism algebra of some vector space (or module) V. The property of ? being an algebra homomorphism means that ? preserves the multiplicative operation (that is, ?(xy) = ?(x)?(y) for all x and y in A), and that ? sends the unit of A to the unit of End(V) (that is, to the identity endomorphism of V).
If A and B are two algebras, and ? : A -> End(V) and τ : B -> End(W) are two representations, then there is a (canonical) representation A B -> End(V W) of the tensor product algebra A B on the vector space V W. However, there is no natural way of defining a tensor product of two representations of a single associative algebra in such a way that the result is still a representation of that same algebra (not of its tensor product with itself), without somehow imposing additional conditions. Here, by tensor product of representations, the usual meaning is intended: the result should be a linear representation of the same algebra on the product vector space. Imposing such additional structure typically leads to the idea of a Hopf algebra or a Lie algebra, as demonstrated below.
Consider, for example, two representations and . One might try to form a tensor product representation according to how it acts on the product vector space, so that
However, such a map would not be linear, since one would have
for k ? K. One can rescue this attempt and restore linearity by imposing additional structure, by defining an algebra homomorphism ?: A -> A ⊗ A, and defining the tensor product representation as
Such a homomorphism ? is called a comultiplication if it satisfies certain axioms. The resulting structure is called a bialgebra. To be consistent with the definitions of the associative algebra, the coalgebra must be co-associative, and, if the algebra is unital, then the co-algebra must be co-unital as well. A Hopf algebra is a bialgebra with an additional piece of structure (the so-called antipode), which allows not only to define the tensor product of two representations, but also the Hom module of two representations (again, similarly to how it is done in the representation theory of groups).
One can try to be more clever in defining a tensor product. Consider, for example,
so that the action on the tensor product space is given by
This map is clearly linear in x, and so it does not have the problem of the earlier definition. However, it fails to preserve multiplication:
But, in general, this does not equal
This shows that this definition of a tensor product is too naive; the obvious fix is to define it such that it is antisymmetric, so that the middle two terms cancel. This leads to the concept of a Lie algebra.
Some authors use the term "associative algebra" to refer to structures which do not necessarily have a multiplicative identity, and hence consider homomorphisms which are not necessarily unital.
One example of a non-unital associative algebra is given by the set of all functions f: R -> R whose limit as x nears infinity is zero.
Another example is the vector space of continuous periodic functions, together with the convolution product.